Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements

This article examines the relative prevalence of markets, hierarchies and networks in the governance of real-estate transactions under three property rights regimes in Windhoek’s low-income settlements. These governance structures are related to respective property rights regimes and to conjectures...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manya Mooya, Chris Cloete
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2012-12-01
Series:Acta Structilia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/as/article/view/128
id doaj-e4b2efedf6c04cab9ca23ce850ddb380
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4b2efedf6c04cab9ca23ce850ddb3802020-11-25T00:35:08ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Structilia1023-05642415-04872012-12-011924673Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlementsManya Mooya 0Chris Cloete 1University of Cape TownUniversity of PretoriaThis article examines the relative prevalence of markets, hierarchies and networks in the governance of real-estate transactions under three property rights regimes in Windhoek’s low-income settlements. These governance structures are related to respective property rights regimes and to conjectures made about the implications for capital accumulation for the urban poor. It is found that network governance structures are the predominant modes of organising transactions under conditions of informal property rights, while hierarchical mechanisms predominate in the freehold and group categories. It is found that there is very little secondary market activity in all three rights categories. The article posits that, while networks provide access to real estate for the poor under conditions of informal rights, these are associated with tenure insecurity, and lock households in clusters based on ethnicity and kinship. Hierarchical structures, on the other hand, make freehold ownerships possible for the poor, but suffer from insufficient scale and create market distortions. It is concluded that a lack of secondary market activity in all the three rights categories severely limits the potential for capital accumulation.http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/as/article/view/128Property rightsReal-estate transactionsGovernance structuresWindhoek
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manya Mooya
Chris Cloete
spellingShingle Manya Mooya
Chris Cloete
Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
Acta Structilia
Property rights
Real-estate transactions
Governance structures
Windhoek
author_facet Manya Mooya
Chris Cloete
author_sort Manya Mooya
title Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
title_short Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
title_full Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
title_fullStr Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
title_full_unstemmed Governance structures for real estate transactions: Markets, networks and hierarchies in Windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
title_sort governance structures for real estate transactions: markets, networks and hierarchies in windhoek’s urban low-income settlements
publisher University of the Free State
series Acta Structilia
issn 1023-0564
2415-0487
publishDate 2012-12-01
description This article examines the relative prevalence of markets, hierarchies and networks in the governance of real-estate transactions under three property rights regimes in Windhoek’s low-income settlements. These governance structures are related to respective property rights regimes and to conjectures made about the implications for capital accumulation for the urban poor. It is found that network governance structures are the predominant modes of organising transactions under conditions of informal property rights, while hierarchical mechanisms predominate in the freehold and group categories. It is found that there is very little secondary market activity in all three rights categories. The article posits that, while networks provide access to real estate for the poor under conditions of informal rights, these are associated with tenure insecurity, and lock households in clusters based on ethnicity and kinship. Hierarchical structures, on the other hand, make freehold ownerships possible for the poor, but suffer from insufficient scale and create market distortions. It is concluded that a lack of secondary market activity in all the three rights categories severely limits the potential for capital accumulation.
topic Property rights
Real-estate transactions
Governance structures
Windhoek
url http://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/as/article/view/128
work_keys_str_mv AT manyamooya governancestructuresforrealestatetransactionsmarketsnetworksandhierarchiesinwindhoeksurbanlowincomesettlements
AT chriscloete governancestructuresforrealestatetransactionsmarketsnetworksandhierarchiesinwindhoeksurbanlowincomesettlements
_version_ 1725310109119152128