Dopuszczalność kary śmierci w ujęciu Tadeusza Ślipki. Kara śmierci rekapitulacją uprawnionej obrony
The above article presents a critical analysis of a conception of limited admissibility of death penalty by Tadeusz Ślipko (restrained retention). Its essence is based on the fact that the victim of a wrongful aggressor has got the right to effectively defend his/her life. The source of such law li...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University Press
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/3051 |
Summary: | The above article presents a critical analysis of a conception of limited admissibility of death penalty by Tadeusz Ślipko (restrained retention). Its essence is based on the fact that the victim of a wrongful aggressor has got the right to effectively defend his/her life. The source of such law lies in the absolute inviolability of innocent human’s life as a fundamental right of every man. In case of efficient act of aggression (cold – blooded murder), the state takes over the right to effectively defend the victim’s right of life by administering the perpetrator the death penalty (“life for life”).
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1733-1218 |