Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters

While flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) operated in short-circuited closed cycle (SCC) mode appears to hold promise for removal of salt from brackish source waters, there has been limited investigation on the removal of other water constituents such as nitrate, fluoride or bromide in com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jingke Song, Jinxing Ma, Changyong Zhang, Calvin He, T. David Waite
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Chemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fchem.2019.00146/full
id doaj-e4a69b50e76f4b2ba8227656201f72c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4a69b50e76f4b2ba8227656201f72c02020-11-25T00:13:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Chemistry2296-26462019-03-01710.3389/fchem.2019.00146422134Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source WatersJingke Song0Jingke Song1Jingke Song2Jinxing Ma3Changyong Zhang4Calvin He5T. David Waite6UNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, ChinaShanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai, ChinaUNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUNSW Water Research Centre, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaWhile flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) operated in short-circuited closed cycle (SCC) mode appears to hold promise for removal of salt from brackish source waters, there has been limited investigation on the removal of other water constituents such as nitrate, fluoride or bromide in combination with salt removal. Of particular concern is the effectiveness of FCDI when ions, such as nitrate, are recognized to non-electrostatically adsorb strongly to activated carbon particles thereby potentially rendering it difficult to regenerate these particles. In this study, SCC FCDI was used to desalt source waters containing nitrate at different concentrations. Results indicate that nitrate can be removed from source waters using FCDI to concentrations <1 mg NO3-N L−1 though a lower quality target such as 10 mg L−1 would be more cost-effective, particularly where the influent nitrate concentration is high (50 mg NO3-N L−1). Although studies of the fate of nitrate in the FCDI system show that physico-chemical adsorption of nitrate to the carbon initially plays a vital role in nitrate removal, the ongoing process of nitrate removal is not significantly affected by this phenomenon with this lack of effect most likely due to the continued formation of electrical double layers enabling capacitive nitrate removal. In contrast to conventional CDI systems, constant voltage mode is shown to be more favorable in maintaining stable effluent quality in SCC FCDI because the decrease in electrical potential that occurs in constant current operation leads to a reduction in the extent of salt removal from the brackish source waters. Through periodic replacement of the electrolyte at a water recovery of 91.4%, we show that the FCDI system can achieve a continuous desalting performance with the effluent NO3-N concentration below 1 mg NO3-N L−1 at low energy consumption (~0.5 kWh m−3) but high productivity.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fchem.2019.00146/fullflow-electrodecapacitive deionizationnitrate removalenergy consumptionsource waterswater recovery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jingke Song
Jingke Song
Jingke Song
Jinxing Ma
Changyong Zhang
Calvin He
T. David Waite
spellingShingle Jingke Song
Jingke Song
Jingke Song
Jinxing Ma
Changyong Zhang
Calvin He
T. David Waite
Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
Frontiers in Chemistry
flow-electrode
capacitive deionization
nitrate removal
energy consumption
source waters
water recovery
author_facet Jingke Song
Jingke Song
Jingke Song
Jinxing Ma
Changyong Zhang
Calvin He
T. David Waite
author_sort Jingke Song
title Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
title_short Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
title_full Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
title_fullStr Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
title_full_unstemmed Implication of Non-electrostatic Contribution to Deionization in Flow-Electrode CDI: Case Study of Nitrate Removal From Contaminated Source Waters
title_sort implication of non-electrostatic contribution to deionization in flow-electrode cdi: case study of nitrate removal from contaminated source waters
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Chemistry
issn 2296-2646
publishDate 2019-03-01
description While flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) operated in short-circuited closed cycle (SCC) mode appears to hold promise for removal of salt from brackish source waters, there has been limited investigation on the removal of other water constituents such as nitrate, fluoride or bromide in combination with salt removal. Of particular concern is the effectiveness of FCDI when ions, such as nitrate, are recognized to non-electrostatically adsorb strongly to activated carbon particles thereby potentially rendering it difficult to regenerate these particles. In this study, SCC FCDI was used to desalt source waters containing nitrate at different concentrations. Results indicate that nitrate can be removed from source waters using FCDI to concentrations <1 mg NO3-N L−1 though a lower quality target such as 10 mg L−1 would be more cost-effective, particularly where the influent nitrate concentration is high (50 mg NO3-N L−1). Although studies of the fate of nitrate in the FCDI system show that physico-chemical adsorption of nitrate to the carbon initially plays a vital role in nitrate removal, the ongoing process of nitrate removal is not significantly affected by this phenomenon with this lack of effect most likely due to the continued formation of electrical double layers enabling capacitive nitrate removal. In contrast to conventional CDI systems, constant voltage mode is shown to be more favorable in maintaining stable effluent quality in SCC FCDI because the decrease in electrical potential that occurs in constant current operation leads to a reduction in the extent of salt removal from the brackish source waters. Through periodic replacement of the electrolyte at a water recovery of 91.4%, we show that the FCDI system can achieve a continuous desalting performance with the effluent NO3-N concentration below 1 mg NO3-N L−1 at low energy consumption (~0.5 kWh m−3) but high productivity.
topic flow-electrode
capacitive deionization
nitrate removal
energy consumption
source waters
water recovery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fchem.2019.00146/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jingkesong implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
AT jingkesong implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
AT jingkesong implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
AT jinxingma implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
AT changyongzhang implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
AT calvinhe implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
AT tdavidwaite implicationofnonelectrostaticcontributiontodeionizationinflowelectrodecdicasestudyofnitrateremovalfromcontaminatedsourcewaters
_version_ 1725392333013254144