Modelling and Searching of Combinatorial Spaces Based on Markov Logic Networks
Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) combine Markov networks (MNs) and first-order logic by attaching weights to first-order formulas and using these as templates for features of MNs. Learning the structure of MLNs is performed by state-of-the-art methods by maximizing the likelihood of a relational databas...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2011-06-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Algorithms & Computational Technology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1260/1748-3018.5.2.289 |
| Summary: | Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) combine Markov networks (MNs) and first-order logic by attaching weights to first-order formulas and using these as templates for features of MNs. Learning the structure of MLNs is performed by state-of-the-art methods by maximizing the likelihood of a relational database. This leads to suboptimal results for prediction tasks due to the mismatch between the objective function (likelihood) and the task of classification (maximizing conditional likelihood (CL)). In this paper we propose two algorithms for learning the structure of MLNs. The first maximizes the CL of query predicates instead of the joint likelihood of all predicates while the other maximizes the area under the Precision-Recall curve (AUC). Both algorithms set the parameters by maximum likelihood and choose structures by maximizing CL or AUC. For each of these algorithms we develop two different searching strategies. The first is based on Iterated Local Search and the second on Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure. We compare the performances of these randomized search approaches on real-world datasets and show that on larger datasets, the ILS-based approaches perform better, both in terms of CLL and AUC, while on small datasets, ILS and RBS approaches are competitive and RBS can also lead to better results for AUC. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1748-3018 1748-3026 |