La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire
The description will have been the biggest forgotten of the semiotic approaches of literature, which favored strongly the narrative, even though it was in the center of the first painting’s and image’s semiotic approaches. The reconciliation between the two semiotic sides of the description is possi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Université de liège
2014-12-01
|
| Series: | Signata |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/signata/467 |
| id |
doaj-e49f5b25b1fc447d9dfe57bed439f53d |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-e49f5b25b1fc447d9dfe57bed439f53d2020-11-25T04:08:10ZengUniversité de liègeSignata2032-98062014-12-01510112110.4000/signata.467La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraireBernard VouillouxThe description will have been the biggest forgotten of the semiotic approaches of literature, which favored strongly the narrative, even though it was in the center of the first painting’s and image’s semiotic approaches. The reconciliation between the two semiotic sides of the description is possible only not to identify anymore literature with the fiction and to consider the veridictive uses of the descriptive statements, including in contexts which can be fictional. These uses, with their functions and appropriate purposes, turn out particularly revealing in the case of the descriptions of works of art, as far as they involve two “languages”.http://journals.openedition.org/signata/467artpragmaticsdiscourseimage |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Bernard Vouilloux |
| spellingShingle |
Bernard Vouilloux La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire Signata art pragmatics discourse image |
| author_facet |
Bernard Vouilloux |
| author_sort |
Bernard Vouilloux |
| title |
La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire |
| title_short |
La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire |
| title_full |
La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire |
| title_fullStr |
La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire |
| title_sort |
la description de l’œuvre d’art : un double défi pour la sémiotique du texte littéraire |
| publisher |
Université de liège |
| series |
Signata |
| issn |
2032-9806 |
| publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
| description |
The description will have been the biggest forgotten of the semiotic approaches of literature, which favored strongly the narrative, even though it was in the center of the first painting’s and image’s semiotic approaches. The reconciliation between the two semiotic sides of the description is possible only not to identify anymore literature with the fiction and to consider the veridictive uses of the descriptive statements, including in contexts which can be fictional. These uses, with their functions and appropriate purposes, turn out particularly revealing in the case of the descriptions of works of art, as far as they involve two “languages”. |
| topic |
art pragmatics discourse image |
| url |
http://journals.openedition.org/signata/467 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT bernardvouilloux ladescriptiondelœuvredartundoubledefipourlasemiotiquedutextelitteraire |
| _version_ |
1724426590982504448 |