The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3264555?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-e49243b44563436faa7dc65d66ba6c6d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e49243b44563436faa7dc65d66ba6c6d2020-11-25T02:55:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e2921910.1371/journal.pone.0029219The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.Yu-Wen ChienBruce R LevinKeith P KlugmanRecent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3264555?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yu-Wen Chien Bruce R Levin Keith P Klugman |
spellingShingle |
Yu-Wen Chien Bruce R Levin Keith P Klugman The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Yu-Wen Chien Bruce R Levin Keith P Klugman |
author_sort |
Yu-Wen Chien |
title |
The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. |
title_short |
The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. |
title_full |
The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. |
title_fullStr |
The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. |
title_sort |
anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3264555?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuwenchien theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions AT brucerlevin theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions AT keithpklugman theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions AT yuwenchien anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions AT brucerlevin anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions AT keithpklugman anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions |
_version_ |
1724715443797622784 |