The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.

Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Wen Chien, Bruce R Levin, Keith P Klugman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3264555?pdf=render
id doaj-e49243b44563436faa7dc65d66ba6c6d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e49243b44563436faa7dc65d66ba6c6d2020-11-25T02:55:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e2921910.1371/journal.pone.0029219The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.Yu-Wen ChienBruce R LevinKeith P KlugmanRecent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3264555?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu-Wen Chien
Bruce R Levin
Keith P Klugman
spellingShingle Yu-Wen Chien
Bruce R Levin
Keith P Klugman
The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yu-Wen Chien
Bruce R Levin
Keith P Klugman
author_sort Yu-Wen Chien
title The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
title_short The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
title_full The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
title_fullStr The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
title_full_unstemmed The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
title_sort anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3264555?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yuwenchien theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT brucerlevin theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT keithpklugman theanticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT yuwenchien anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT brucerlevin anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
AT keithpklugman anticipatedseverityofa1918likeinfluenzapandemicincontemporarypopulationsthecontributionofantibacterialinterventions
_version_ 1724715443797622784