P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE

Introduction: Accurate determination of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in mice is not straightforward, due to the high resolution needed in both time and space. We compared different techniques in control and aneurysmatic mice. Methods: N=30 male, 18 weeks-old C57Bl/6 mice were included. N=20 ani...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Trachet, R. Fraga-Silva, F.J. Londono-Hoyos, P. Segers, N. Stergiopulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2013-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125939015/view
id doaj-e486692d74d046b4b61b18aa4541eb52
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e486692d74d046b4b61b18aa4541eb522020-11-25T02:27:10ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012013-11-0171010.1016/j.artres.2013.10.130P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICEB. TrachetR. Fraga-SilvaF.J. Londono-HoyosP. SegersN. StergiopulosIntroduction: Accurate determination of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in mice is not straightforward, due to the high resolution needed in both time and space. We compared different techniques in control and aneurysmatic mice. Methods: N=30 male, 18 weeks-old C57Bl/6 mice were included. N=20 animals got implanted an osmotic pump delivering Angiotensin II, and were injected anti-TGF-beta antibodies to provoke aneurysm formation. PWV was determined using 4 different methods: (i) global foot-to-foot transit time based on ultrasound pulsed Doppler velocities (VisualSonics Vevo 2100) at the ascending aorta and 4 cm distal to it (tape-measured); (ii) abdominal foot-to-foot transit time based on 2 invasive pressure sensors placed exactly 2 cm apart (Sciscense catheter), considered the gold standard; (iii) abdominal, in vivo, invasive pressure-diameter (P-D) waveforms obtained via RF wall tracking; (iv) abdominal, ex-vivo P-D curves measured at in vivo stretch using an in-house myograph. The latter were restricted to the in vivo measured pressure range. P-D data were converted to PWV using the Bramwell-Hill equation and groups were statistically compared via a paired student-test. Results: 13 complete datasets were available for analysis. In the control animals all in vivo methods yielded significantly different PWVs compared to the gold standard (p<0.05), and none of the investigated methods were found to correlate to each other. Moreover aneurysm presence was not picked up by transit-time methods, while it resulted in a significant increase in PWV (p<0.0001) in both P-D methods. Conclusions: PWV measurement in mice is not straightforward and results should be interpreted carefully.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125939015/view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Trachet
R. Fraga-Silva
F.J. Londono-Hoyos
P. Segers
N. Stergiopulos
spellingShingle B. Trachet
R. Fraga-Silva
F.J. Londono-Hoyos
P. Segers
N. Stergiopulos
P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE
Artery Research
author_facet B. Trachet
R. Fraga-Silva
F.J. Londono-Hoyos
P. Segers
N. Stergiopulos
author_sort B. Trachet
title P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE
title_short P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE
title_full P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE
title_fullStr P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE
title_full_unstemmed P4.12 A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS TO DETERMINE AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN ANEURYSMATIC AND CONTROL MICE
title_sort p4.12 a comparison of different methods to determine aortic pulse wave velocity in aneurysmatic and control mice
publisher Atlantis Press
series Artery Research
issn 1876-4401
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Introduction: Accurate determination of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in mice is not straightforward, due to the high resolution needed in both time and space. We compared different techniques in control and aneurysmatic mice. Methods: N=30 male, 18 weeks-old C57Bl/6 mice were included. N=20 animals got implanted an osmotic pump delivering Angiotensin II, and were injected anti-TGF-beta antibodies to provoke aneurysm formation. PWV was determined using 4 different methods: (i) global foot-to-foot transit time based on ultrasound pulsed Doppler velocities (VisualSonics Vevo 2100) at the ascending aorta and 4 cm distal to it (tape-measured); (ii) abdominal foot-to-foot transit time based on 2 invasive pressure sensors placed exactly 2 cm apart (Sciscense catheter), considered the gold standard; (iii) abdominal, in vivo, invasive pressure-diameter (P-D) waveforms obtained via RF wall tracking; (iv) abdominal, ex-vivo P-D curves measured at in vivo stretch using an in-house myograph. The latter were restricted to the in vivo measured pressure range. P-D data were converted to PWV using the Bramwell-Hill equation and groups were statistically compared via a paired student-test. Results: 13 complete datasets were available for analysis. In the control animals all in vivo methods yielded significantly different PWVs compared to the gold standard (p<0.05), and none of the investigated methods were found to correlate to each other. Moreover aneurysm presence was not picked up by transit-time methods, while it resulted in a significant increase in PWV (p<0.0001) in both P-D methods. Conclusions: PWV measurement in mice is not straightforward and results should be interpreted carefully.
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125939015/view
work_keys_str_mv AT btrachet p412acomparisonofdifferentmethodstodetermineaorticpulsewavevelocityinaneurysmaticandcontrolmice
AT rfragasilva p412acomparisonofdifferentmethodstodetermineaorticpulsewavevelocityinaneurysmaticandcontrolmice
AT fjlondonohoyos p412acomparisonofdifferentmethodstodetermineaorticpulsewavevelocityinaneurysmaticandcontrolmice
AT psegers p412acomparisonofdifferentmethodstodetermineaorticpulsewavevelocityinaneurysmaticandcontrolmice
AT nstergiopulos p412acomparisonofdifferentmethodstodetermineaorticpulsewavevelocityinaneurysmaticandcontrolmice
_version_ 1724843946995089408