Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling

Despite theoretical benefits of recurrent artificial neural networks over their feedforward counterparts, it is still unclear whether the former offer practical advantages as rainfall–runoff models. The main drawback of recurrent networks is the increased complexity of the training procedure due...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. J. de Vos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/253/2013/hess-17-253-2013.pdf
id doaj-e470e90b7d0a4dbf98d2065efae200ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e470e90b7d0a4dbf98d2065efae200ce2020-11-25T00:17:45ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382013-01-0117125326710.5194/hess-17-253-2013Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modellingN. J. de VosDespite theoretical benefits of recurrent artificial neural networks over their feedforward counterparts, it is still unclear whether the former offer practical advantages as rainfall–runoff models. The main drawback of recurrent networks is the increased complexity of the training procedure due to their architecture. This work uses the recently introduced and conceptually simple echo state networks for streamflow forecasts on twelve river basins in the Eastern United States, and compares them to a variety of traditional feedforward and recurrent approaches. Two modifications on the echo state network models are made that increase the hydrologically relevant information content of their internal state. The results show that the echo state networks outperform feedforward networks and are competitive with state-of-the-art recurrent networks, across a range of performance measures. This, along with their simplicity and ease of training, suggests that they can be considered promising alternatives to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/253/2013/hess-17-253-2013.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. J. de Vos
spellingShingle N. J. de Vos
Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet N. J. de Vos
author_sort N. J. de Vos
title Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
title_short Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
title_full Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
title_fullStr Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
title_full_unstemmed Echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
title_sort echo state networks as an alternative to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Despite theoretical benefits of recurrent artificial neural networks over their feedforward counterparts, it is still unclear whether the former offer practical advantages as rainfall–runoff models. The main drawback of recurrent networks is the increased complexity of the training procedure due to their architecture. This work uses the recently introduced and conceptually simple echo state networks for streamflow forecasts on twelve river basins in the Eastern United States, and compares them to a variety of traditional feedforward and recurrent approaches. Two modifications on the echo state network models are made that increase the hydrologically relevant information content of their internal state. The results show that the echo state networks outperform feedforward networks and are competitive with state-of-the-art recurrent networks, across a range of performance measures. This, along with their simplicity and ease of training, suggests that they can be considered promising alternatives to traditional artificial neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/17/253/2013/hess-17-253-2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT njdevos echostatenetworksasanalternativetotraditionalartificialneuralnetworksinrainfallrunoffmodelling
_version_ 1725378209816510464