Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast

Abstract Cell-based scaffold-free therapies seek to develop in vitro organotypic three-dimensional (3D) tissue-like surrogates, capitalising upon the inherent capacity of cells to create tissues with efficiency and sophistication that is still unparalleled by human-made devices. Although automation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea De Pieri, Yury Rochev, Dimitrios I. Zeugolis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:npj Regenerative Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00133-3
id doaj-e46f1ce01c0b41439ae9e3cc22956c3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e46f1ce01c0b41439ae9e3cc22956c3e2021-04-04T11:14:52ZengNature Publishing Groupnpj Regenerative Medicine2057-39952021-03-016111510.1038/s41536-021-00133-3Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecastAndrea De Pieri0Yury Rochev1Dimitrios I. Zeugolis2Regenerative, Modular & Developmental Engineering Laboratory (REMODEL), Biomedical Sciences Building, National University of Ireland Galway (NUI Galway)Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Centre for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM), Biomedical Sciences Building, National University of Ireland Galway (NUI Galway)Regenerative, Modular & Developmental Engineering Laboratory (REMODEL), Biomedical Sciences Building, National University of Ireland Galway (NUI Galway)Abstract Cell-based scaffold-free therapies seek to develop in vitro organotypic three-dimensional (3D) tissue-like surrogates, capitalising upon the inherent capacity of cells to create tissues with efficiency and sophistication that is still unparalleled by human-made devices. Although automation systems have been realised and (some) success stories have been witnessed over the years in clinical and commercial arenas, in vitro organogenesis is far from becoming a standard way of care. This limited technology transfer is largely attributed to scalability-associated costs, considering that the development of a borderline 3D implantable device requires very high number of functional cells and prolonged ex vivo culture periods. Herein, we critically discuss advancements and shortfalls of scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering strategies, along with pioneering concepts that have the potential to transform regenerative and reparative medicine.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00133-3
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea De Pieri
Yury Rochev
Dimitrios I. Zeugolis
spellingShingle Andrea De Pieri
Yury Rochev
Dimitrios I. Zeugolis
Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
npj Regenerative Medicine
author_facet Andrea De Pieri
Yury Rochev
Dimitrios I. Zeugolis
author_sort Andrea De Pieri
title Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
title_short Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
title_full Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
title_fullStr Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
title_full_unstemmed Scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
title_sort scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering therapies: advances, shortfalls and forecast
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series npj Regenerative Medicine
issn 2057-3995
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Cell-based scaffold-free therapies seek to develop in vitro organotypic three-dimensional (3D) tissue-like surrogates, capitalising upon the inherent capacity of cells to create tissues with efficiency and sophistication that is still unparalleled by human-made devices. Although automation systems have been realised and (some) success stories have been witnessed over the years in clinical and commercial arenas, in vitro organogenesis is far from becoming a standard way of care. This limited technology transfer is largely attributed to scalability-associated costs, considering that the development of a borderline 3D implantable device requires very high number of functional cells and prolonged ex vivo culture periods. Herein, we critically discuss advancements and shortfalls of scaffold-free cell-based tissue engineering strategies, along with pioneering concepts that have the potential to transform regenerative and reparative medicine.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00133-3
work_keys_str_mv AT andreadepieri scaffoldfreecellbasedtissueengineeringtherapiesadvancesshortfallsandforecast
AT yuryrochev scaffoldfreecellbasedtissueengineeringtherapiesadvancesshortfallsandforecast
AT dimitriosizeugolis scaffoldfreecellbasedtissueengineeringtherapiesadvancesshortfallsandforecast
_version_ 1721542978961408000