Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task

Communication plays an important role in consensus decision-making which pervades our daily life. However, the exact role of communication in consensus formation is not clear. Here, to study the effects of communication on consensus formation, we designed a dyadic colour estimation task, where a pai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liutao Yu, Chundi Wang, Si Wu, Da-Hui Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2020-07-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191974
id doaj-e45bc3ab877d452b9500bb019f4a9575
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e45bc3ab877d452b9500bb019f4a95752020-11-25T04:04:21ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032020-07-017710.1098/rsos.191974191974Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation taskLiutao YuChundi WangSi WuDa-Hui WangCommunication plays an important role in consensus decision-making which pervades our daily life. However, the exact role of communication in consensus formation is not clear. Here, to study the effects of communication on consensus formation, we designed a dyadic colour estimation task, where a pair of isolated participants repeatedly estimated the colours of discs until they reached a consensus or completed eight estimations, either with or without communication. We show that participants’ estimates gradually approach each other, reaching towards a consensus, and these are enhanced with communication. We also show that dyadic consensus estimation is on average better than individual estimation. Surprisingly, consensus estimation without communication generally outperforms that with communication, indicating that communication impairs the improvement of consensus estimation. However, without communication, it takes longer to reach a consensus. Moreover, participants who partially cooperate with each other tend to result in better overall consensus. Taken together, we have identified the effect of communication on the dynamics of consensus formation, and the results may have implications on group decision-making in general.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191974consensus decision-makingdyadic colour estimationdynamic communication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liutao Yu
Chundi Wang
Si Wu
Da-Hui Wang
spellingShingle Liutao Yu
Chundi Wang
Si Wu
Da-Hui Wang
Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
Royal Society Open Science
consensus decision-making
dyadic colour estimation
dynamic communication
author_facet Liutao Yu
Chundi Wang
Si Wu
Da-Hui Wang
author_sort Liutao Yu
title Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
title_short Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
title_full Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
title_fullStr Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
title_full_unstemmed Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
title_sort communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Communication plays an important role in consensus decision-making which pervades our daily life. However, the exact role of communication in consensus formation is not clear. Here, to study the effects of communication on consensus formation, we designed a dyadic colour estimation task, where a pair of isolated participants repeatedly estimated the colours of discs until they reached a consensus or completed eight estimations, either with or without communication. We show that participants’ estimates gradually approach each other, reaching towards a consensus, and these are enhanced with communication. We also show that dyadic consensus estimation is on average better than individual estimation. Surprisingly, consensus estimation without communication generally outperforms that with communication, indicating that communication impairs the improvement of consensus estimation. However, without communication, it takes longer to reach a consensus. Moreover, participants who partially cooperate with each other tend to result in better overall consensus. Taken together, we have identified the effect of communication on the dynamics of consensus formation, and the results may have implications on group decision-making in general.
topic consensus decision-making
dyadic colour estimation
dynamic communication
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191974
work_keys_str_mv AT liutaoyu communicationspeedsupbutimpairstheconsensusdecisioninadyadiccolourestimationtask
AT chundiwang communicationspeedsupbutimpairstheconsensusdecisioninadyadiccolourestimationtask
AT siwu communicationspeedsupbutimpairstheconsensusdecisioninadyadiccolourestimationtask
AT dahuiwang communicationspeedsupbutimpairstheconsensusdecisioninadyadiccolourestimationtask
_version_ 1724437201648877568