A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The goal of this study was to assess potential differences between administrators/policymakers and those involved in direct practice regarding factors believed to be barriers or facilitating factors to evidence-based practice (EBP) i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Green Amy E, Aarons Gregory A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:Implementation Science
Online Access:http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/104
id doaj-e457992ca2214d59af33b9371557f3bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e457992ca2214d59af33b9371557f3bc2020-11-24T21:05:30ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082011-09-016110410.1186/1748-5908-6-104A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mappingGreen Amy EAarons Gregory A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The goal of this study was to assess potential differences between administrators/policymakers and those involved in direct practice regarding factors believed to be barriers or facilitating factors to evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation in a large public mental health service system in the United States.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants included mental health system county officials, agency directors, program managers, clinical staff, administrative staff, and consumers. As part of concept mapping procedures, brainstorming groups were conducted with each target group to identify specific factors believed to be barriers or facilitating factors to EBP implementation in a large public mental health system. Statements were sorted by similarity and rated by each participant in regard to their perceived importance and changeability. Multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, descriptive statistics and <it>t</it>-tests were used to analyze the data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 105 statements were distilled into 14 clusters using concept-mapping procedures. Perceptions of importance of factors affecting EBP implementation varied between the two groups, with those involved in direct practice assigning significantly higher ratings to the importance of Clinical Perceptions and the impact of EBP implementation on clinical practice. Consistent with previous studies, financial concerns (costs, funding) were rated among the most important and least likely to change by both groups.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>EBP implementation is a complex process, and different stakeholders may hold different opinions regarding the relative importance of the impact of EBP implementation. Implementation efforts must include input from stakeholders at multiple levels to bring divergent and convergent perspectives to light.</p> http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/104
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Green Amy E
Aarons Gregory A
spellingShingle Green Amy E
Aarons Gregory A
A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
Implementation Science
author_facet Green Amy E
Aarons Gregory A
author_sort Green Amy E
title A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
title_short A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
title_full A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
title_fullStr A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
title_sort comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping
publisher BMC
series Implementation Science
issn 1748-5908
publishDate 2011-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The goal of this study was to assess potential differences between administrators/policymakers and those involved in direct practice regarding factors believed to be barriers or facilitating factors to evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation in a large public mental health service system in the United States.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Participants included mental health system county officials, agency directors, program managers, clinical staff, administrative staff, and consumers. As part of concept mapping procedures, brainstorming groups were conducted with each target group to identify specific factors believed to be barriers or facilitating factors to EBP implementation in a large public mental health system. Statements were sorted by similarity and rated by each participant in regard to their perceived importance and changeability. Multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis, descriptive statistics and <it>t</it>-tests were used to analyze the data.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 105 statements were distilled into 14 clusters using concept-mapping procedures. Perceptions of importance of factors affecting EBP implementation varied between the two groups, with those involved in direct practice assigning significantly higher ratings to the importance of Clinical Perceptions and the impact of EBP implementation on clinical practice. Consistent with previous studies, financial concerns (costs, funding) were rated among the most important and least likely to change by both groups.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>EBP implementation is a complex process, and different stakeholders may hold different opinions regarding the relative importance of the impact of EBP implementation. Implementation efforts must include input from stakeholders at multiple levels to bring divergent and convergent perspectives to light.</p>
url http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/104
work_keys_str_mv AT greenamye acomparisonofpolicyanddirectpracticestakeholderperceptionsoffactorsaffectingevidencebasedpracticeimplementationusingconceptmapping
AT aaronsgregorya acomparisonofpolicyanddirectpracticestakeholderperceptionsoffactorsaffectingevidencebasedpracticeimplementationusingconceptmapping
AT greenamye comparisonofpolicyanddirectpracticestakeholderperceptionsoffactorsaffectingevidencebasedpracticeimplementationusingconceptmapping
AT aaronsgregorya comparisonofpolicyanddirectpracticestakeholderperceptionsoffactorsaffectingevidencebasedpracticeimplementationusingconceptmapping
_version_ 1716768535048355840