Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons

Previous research has shown that if people improve other’s ideas, they subsequently unconsciously plagiarise them at a dramatically higher rate than if they imagine them, or simply hear them again. It has been claimed that this occurs because improvement resembles the process of generation, and that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Timothy J. Perfect, Louisa-Jayne Stark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2012-05-01
Series:Europe's Journal of Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/v8i2.459
id doaj-e44a9c57421a455b855dd3e893cb8643
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e44a9c57421a455b855dd3e893cb86432020-11-25T03:34:53ZengPsychOpenEurope's Journal of Psychology1841-04132012-05-018227528310.5964/ejop.v8i2.45910.5964/ejop.v8i2.459Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant ReasonsTimothy J. Perfect0Louisa-Jayne Stark1University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UKUniversity of Plymouth, Plymouth, UKPrevious research has shown that if people improve other’s ideas, they subsequently unconsciously plagiarise them at a dramatically higher rate than if they imagine them, or simply hear them again. It has been claimed that this occurs because improvement resembles the process of generation, and that these are confused during retrieval. However, an alternate possibility is tested here: plagiarism may increases because improvement increases personal relevance of the ideas. Two studies were conducted in which there was an initial generation phase, followed by an elaboration phase in which participants imagined the previous ideas, improved them for their own use, or improved them for an older adult’s use. One week later, participants attempted to recall their own ideas, and generated new solutions to the previous problems. In both studies, improvement of doubled the rate of subsequent plagiarism in the recall own task, but this effect was not mediated by whether people improved ideas for their own use, of for use by someone else. Improvement had no effect on plagiarism in the generate-new task. These studies therefore rule out personal relevance, or personal semantics as the source of the improvement effect in unconscious plagiarism.http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/v8i2.459source memoryunconscious plagiarismself
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Timothy J. Perfect
Louisa-Jayne Stark
spellingShingle Timothy J. Perfect
Louisa-Jayne Stark
Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons
Europe's Journal of Psychology
source memory
unconscious plagiarism
self
author_facet Timothy J. Perfect
Louisa-Jayne Stark
author_sort Timothy J. Perfect
title Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons
title_short Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons
title_full Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons
title_fullStr Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons
title_full_unstemmed Unconscious Plagiarism in Recall: Attribution to the Self, but not for Self-Relevant Reasons
title_sort unconscious plagiarism in recall: attribution to the self, but not for self-relevant reasons
publisher PsychOpen
series Europe's Journal of Psychology
issn 1841-0413
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Previous research has shown that if people improve other’s ideas, they subsequently unconsciously plagiarise them at a dramatically higher rate than if they imagine them, or simply hear them again. It has been claimed that this occurs because improvement resembles the process of generation, and that these are confused during retrieval. However, an alternate possibility is tested here: plagiarism may increases because improvement increases personal relevance of the ideas. Two studies were conducted in which there was an initial generation phase, followed by an elaboration phase in which participants imagined the previous ideas, improved them for their own use, or improved them for an older adult’s use. One week later, participants attempted to recall their own ideas, and generated new solutions to the previous problems. In both studies, improvement of doubled the rate of subsequent plagiarism in the recall own task, but this effect was not mediated by whether people improved ideas for their own use, of for use by someone else. Improvement had no effect on plagiarism in the generate-new task. These studies therefore rule out personal relevance, or personal semantics as the source of the improvement effect in unconscious plagiarism.
topic source memory
unconscious plagiarism
self
url http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/v8i2.459
work_keys_str_mv AT timothyjperfect unconsciousplagiarisminrecallattributiontotheselfbutnotforselfrelevantreasons
AT louisajaynestark unconsciousplagiarisminrecallattributiontotheselfbutnotforselfrelevantreasons
_version_ 1724556844730417152