Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?

A growing body of evidence has suggested that time, from early to late, or from past to future, was represented in a spatially oriented mental time line. However, little is known about its characteristics. The present study provided the first empirical evidence to explore the symmetry of spatial rep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xianfeng eDing, Ning eFeng, Xiaorong eCheng, Huashan eLiu, Zhao eFan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00208/full
id doaj-e4437e3e389d468083b2d046f1f7030a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4437e3e389d468083b2d046f1f7030a2020-11-25T01:09:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-02-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.00208132578Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?Xianfeng eDing0Ning eFeng1Xiaorong eCheng2Huashan eLiu3Zhao eFan4School of Psychology, Central China Normal UniversitySchool of Psychology, Central China Normal UniversitySchool of Psychology, Central China Normal UniversitySchool of Psychology, Central China Normal UniversitySchool of Psychology, Central China Normal UniversityA growing body of evidence has suggested that time, from early to late, or from past to future, was represented in a spatially oriented mental time line. However, little is known about its characteristics. The present study provided the first empirical evidence to explore the symmetry of spatial representations of past and future in the mental time line. Specifically, we compared the Spatial-Temporal Association Response Codes (STARC) effects and distance effects of past and future in four experiments. Results showed that for near past and near future, STARC effects were similar (Experiment 1). For distant past, the STARC effect was significant, but not for distant future (Experiment 2). Furthermore, the distance effect in the past was significantly stronger than in the future (Experiment 3 and 4). These findings supported the idea that time points are not evenly distributed in mental time line. Spatial representations of the past and the future are asymmetric, and the spatial representation of past seems stronger than future. The logarithmic pattern of internal spatial representation of past or future is also discussed.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00208/fullasymmetrydistance effectmental time lineSTARC effectspatial representation of time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xianfeng eDing
Ning eFeng
Xiaorong eCheng
Huashan eLiu
Zhao eFan
spellingShingle Xianfeng eDing
Ning eFeng
Xiaorong eCheng
Huashan eLiu
Zhao eFan
Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
Frontiers in Psychology
asymmetry
distance effect
mental time line
STARC effect
spatial representation of time
author_facet Xianfeng eDing
Ning eFeng
Xiaorong eCheng
Huashan eLiu
Zhao eFan
author_sort Xianfeng eDing
title Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
title_short Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
title_full Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
title_fullStr Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
title_full_unstemmed Are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
title_sort are past and future symmetric in mental time line?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-02-01
description A growing body of evidence has suggested that time, from early to late, or from past to future, was represented in a spatially oriented mental time line. However, little is known about its characteristics. The present study provided the first empirical evidence to explore the symmetry of spatial representations of past and future in the mental time line. Specifically, we compared the Spatial-Temporal Association Response Codes (STARC) effects and distance effects of past and future in four experiments. Results showed that for near past and near future, STARC effects were similar (Experiment 1). For distant past, the STARC effect was significant, but not for distant future (Experiment 2). Furthermore, the distance effect in the past was significantly stronger than in the future (Experiment 3 and 4). These findings supported the idea that time points are not evenly distributed in mental time line. Spatial representations of the past and the future are asymmetric, and the spatial representation of past seems stronger than future. The logarithmic pattern of internal spatial representation of past or future is also discussed.
topic asymmetry
distance effect
mental time line
STARC effect
spatial representation of time
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00208/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xianfengeding arepastandfuturesymmetricinmentaltimeline
AT ningefeng arepastandfuturesymmetricinmentaltimeline
AT xiaorongecheng arepastandfuturesymmetricinmentaltimeline
AT huashaneliu arepastandfuturesymmetricinmentaltimeline
AT zhaoefan arepastandfuturesymmetricinmentaltimeline
_version_ 1725179231172820992