Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo
The present article addresses aspects of eyewitness identification in Brazil and the United States, as well as some of the factors that imply the fallibility of testimony. The main purpose of the research is to understand how does each, Brazil and the United States, treat testimonial evidence? What...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/339 |
id |
doaj-e436eb8132ba4734bc5d198a2b966ed2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e436eb8132ba4734bc5d198a2b966ed22020-11-25T04:04:43ZspaInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2020-10-01631699173110.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.339191Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reoMarina Trindade Magalhães0Universidade de Brasília Instituto Brasiliense de Direito PúblicoThe present article addresses aspects of eyewitness identification in Brazil and the United States, as well as some of the factors that imply the fallibility of testimony. The main purpose of the research is to understand how does each, Brazil and the United States, treat testimonial evidence? What are some of the factors the influence the fallibility of the testimony? Finally, does the non-observance of the legal criteria in the article 226 of the Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code reinforce the Labeling Approach and criminal selectivity? The methodology applied in the research consists in literature review and the analysis of some judicial cases in which eyewitness identification was used as evidence. The specific goals of the study were to analyze the Brazilian and North American doctrinal understanding of eyewitness identification; examine how the Brazilian courts addresses the issue; research the various factors that may influence the identification; and, finally, discuss about the criminal selectivity that can be reinforced by the non-observance of the legal criteria for eyewitness identification. One can conclude that the article 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code, even though it lacks some update, should be applied in its entirety in order to avoid the influence of factors such as false memories and issues involving cross racial identification, weapon effect, among others. Respecting legal criteria is also capable to avoid the strengthening of criminal selectivity and the Labeling Approach.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/339reconhecimento pessoalreconhecimento fotográficopsicologia judiciáriaetiquetamento social. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marina Trindade Magalhães |
spellingShingle |
Marina Trindade Magalhães Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal reconhecimento pessoal reconhecimento fotográfico psicologia judiciária etiquetamento social. |
author_facet |
Marina Trindade Magalhães |
author_sort |
Marina Trindade Magalhães |
title |
Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo |
title_short |
Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo |
title_full |
Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo |
title_fullStr |
Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the Labeling Approach and violation of in dubio pro reo |
title_sort |
eyewitness identification and legal psychology: fallibility of the testimony as a reinforcement of the labeling approach and violation of in dubio pro reo |
publisher |
Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal |
series |
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
issn |
2525-510X |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
The present article addresses aspects of eyewitness identification in Brazil and the United States, as well as some of the factors that imply the fallibility of testimony. The main purpose of the research is to understand how does each, Brazil and the United States, treat testimonial evidence? What are some of the factors the influence the fallibility of the testimony? Finally, does the non-observance of the legal criteria in the article 226 of the Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code reinforce the Labeling Approach and criminal selectivity? The methodology applied in the research consists in literature review and the analysis of some judicial cases in which eyewitness identification was used as evidence. The specific goals of the study were to analyze the Brazilian and North American doctrinal understanding of eyewitness identification; examine how the Brazilian courts addresses the issue; research the various factors that may influence the identification; and, finally, discuss about the criminal selectivity that can be reinforced by the non-observance of the legal criteria for eyewitness identification. One can conclude that the article 226 of the Criminal Procedure Code, even though it lacks some update, should be applied in its entirety in order to avoid the influence of factors such as false memories and issues involving cross racial identification, weapon effect, among others. Respecting legal criteria is also capable to avoid the strengthening of criminal selectivity and the Labeling Approach. |
topic |
reconhecimento pessoal reconhecimento fotográfico psicologia judiciária etiquetamento social. |
url |
http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/339 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marinatrindademagalhaes eyewitnessidentificationandlegalpsychologyfallibilityofthetestimonyasareinforcementofthelabelingapproachandviolationofindubioproreo |
_version_ |
1724435536874045440 |