Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality

The reasons are examined for the disparity between the inclusive vision espoused by Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the reality of the limited extent of inclusion in education systems worldwide. First, the leadership of key senior academics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James M. Kauffman, Garry Hornby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/9/258
id doaj-e42bd8f74139491b8cfe9077d7e65f97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e42bd8f74139491b8cfe9077d7e65f972020-11-25T02:53:54ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022020-09-011025825810.3390/educsci10090258Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education RealityJames M. Kauffman0Garry Hornby1Department of Special Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USAInstitute of Education, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UKThe reasons are examined for the disparity between the inclusive vision espoused by Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the reality of the limited extent of inclusion in education systems worldwide. First, the leadership of key senior academics in the field of special education is considered to have been misguided in promoting a vision of full inclusion despite the lack of research evidence for the benefits of inclusive education over traditional special education provision. Second, attitudes toward and the treatment of people with disabilities have a long and complex history, and in this, many proponents of inclusion have been critical of 20th century special education. In particular, they claim that the sorting, labelling and categorizing required by special education have negative implications. Third, educators have been encouraged to imagine a system of education that is limitless, in the sense that <i>all</i> children with disabilities can be included in general education. This is because it is envisaged that general education classrooms will become so flexible that there will be no limits to the accommodation of students with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of their special educational needs. Fourth is the issue that deciding a student’s placement for education requires a judgment call and that, since human judgment is fallible, errors of judgment will always be made. Fifth, commitments to inclusion require that educators consider the practical, reality-based implications, whereas this has not been the case for many supporters of full inclusion. In conclusion, inclusion in the sense of students being physically present in general education classrooms is not considered as important as inclusion in the reality of being engaged in a program of instruction that is meaningful and challenging. Therefore, we consider that, rather than becoming extinct, special education needs to continue to be developed, disseminated and rigorously implemented in schools. Key special education strategies and approaches must co-exist with those from inclusive education, in order to provide effective education for all young people with special educational needs and disabilities.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/9/258disabilityspecial educationinclusioninclusive education
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James M. Kauffman
Garry Hornby
spellingShingle James M. Kauffman
Garry Hornby
Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
Education Sciences
disability
special education
inclusion
inclusive education
author_facet James M. Kauffman
Garry Hornby
author_sort James M. Kauffman
title Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
title_short Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
title_full Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
title_fullStr Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive Vision Versus Special Education Reality
title_sort inclusive vision versus special education reality
publisher MDPI AG
series Education Sciences
issn 2227-7102
publishDate 2020-09-01
description The reasons are examined for the disparity between the inclusive vision espoused by Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the reality of the limited extent of inclusion in education systems worldwide. First, the leadership of key senior academics in the field of special education is considered to have been misguided in promoting a vision of full inclusion despite the lack of research evidence for the benefits of inclusive education over traditional special education provision. Second, attitudes toward and the treatment of people with disabilities have a long and complex history, and in this, many proponents of inclusion have been critical of 20th century special education. In particular, they claim that the sorting, labelling and categorizing required by special education have negative implications. Third, educators have been encouraged to imagine a system of education that is limitless, in the sense that <i>all</i> children with disabilities can be included in general education. This is because it is envisaged that general education classrooms will become so flexible that there will be no limits to the accommodation of students with disabilities, regardless of the nature or severity of their special educational needs. Fourth is the issue that deciding a student’s placement for education requires a judgment call and that, since human judgment is fallible, errors of judgment will always be made. Fifth, commitments to inclusion require that educators consider the practical, reality-based implications, whereas this has not been the case for many supporters of full inclusion. In conclusion, inclusion in the sense of students being physically present in general education classrooms is not considered as important as inclusion in the reality of being engaged in a program of instruction that is meaningful and challenging. Therefore, we consider that, rather than becoming extinct, special education needs to continue to be developed, disseminated and rigorously implemented in schools. Key special education strategies and approaches must co-exist with those from inclusive education, in order to provide effective education for all young people with special educational needs and disabilities.
topic disability
special education
inclusion
inclusive education
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/9/258
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesmkauffman inclusivevisionversusspecialeducationreality
AT garryhornby inclusivevisionversusspecialeducationreality
_version_ 1724723679342886912