A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures
In managing the COVID-19 pandemic, several compelling narratives seem to have played a significant role in the decision-making processes regarding which risk mitigation and management measures to implement. Many countries were to a large extent unprepared for such a situation, even though prediction...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706/full |
id |
doaj-e4252ccfdf384612a103c7736579cf2b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e4252ccfdf384612a103c7736579cf2b2021-04-20T15:17:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652021-04-01910.3389/fpubh.2021.583706583706A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response MeasuresLove Ekenberg0Love Ekenberg1Love Ekenberg2Adriana Mihai3Adriana Mihai4Tobias Fasth5Tobias Fasth6Nadejda Komendantova7Nadejda Komendantova8Mats Danielson9Mats Danielson10International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, IIASA, Laxenburg, AustriaDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Kista, SwedenInnovating Governance, Vienna, AustriaInnovating Governance, Vienna, AustriaCentre of Excellence for the Study of Cultural Identity, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, RomaniaDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Kista, SwedenDepartment of Public Health Analysis and Data Management, Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, SwedenInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, IIASA, Laxenburg, AustriaInnovating Governance, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Kista, SwedenInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, IIASA, Laxenburg, AustriaIn managing the COVID-19 pandemic, several compelling narratives seem to have played a significant role in the decision-making processes regarding which risk mitigation and management measures to implement. Many countries were to a large extent unprepared for such a situation, even though predictions about a significant probability for a pandemic to occur existed, and national governments of several countries often acted in an uncoordinated manner, which resulted in many inconsistencies in the disaster risk reduction processes. Limited evidence has also made room for strategic narratives meant to persuade the public of the chosen set of actions, even though the degree of uncertainty regarding the outcomes of these was high, further complicating the situation. In this article, we assume a normative standpoint regarding rhapsodic decision making and suggest an integrated framework for a more elaborated decision analysis under the ambiguity of how to contain the virus spread from a policy point of view, while considering epidemiologic estimations and socioeconomic factors in a multi-stakeholder-multi-criteria context based on a co-creative work process for eliciting attitudes, perceptions, as well as preferences amongst relevant stakeholder groups. The framework, applied in our paper on Romania for demonstrative purposes, is used for evaluating mitigation measures for catastrophic events such as the COVID-19 situation, to mobilize better response strategies for future scenarios related to pandemics and other hazardous events, as well as to structure the production and analysis of narratives on the current pandemic effects.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706/fullmulti-criteria decision analysismanaging and mitigating the risk of COVID 19 pandemicrisk governanceSEIR modelsparticipation and inclusion |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Love Ekenberg Love Ekenberg Love Ekenberg Adriana Mihai Adriana Mihai Tobias Fasth Tobias Fasth Nadejda Komendantova Nadejda Komendantova Mats Danielson Mats Danielson |
spellingShingle |
Love Ekenberg Love Ekenberg Love Ekenberg Adriana Mihai Adriana Mihai Tobias Fasth Tobias Fasth Nadejda Komendantova Nadejda Komendantova Mats Danielson Mats Danielson A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures Frontiers in Public Health multi-criteria decision analysis managing and mitigating the risk of COVID 19 pandemic risk governance SEIR models participation and inclusion |
author_facet |
Love Ekenberg Love Ekenberg Love Ekenberg Adriana Mihai Adriana Mihai Tobias Fasth Tobias Fasth Nadejda Komendantova Nadejda Komendantova Mats Danielson Mats Danielson |
author_sort |
Love Ekenberg |
title |
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures |
title_short |
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures |
title_full |
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures |
title_fullStr |
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Multi-Criteria Framework for Pandemic Response Measures |
title_sort |
multi-criteria framework for pandemic response measures |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Public Health |
issn |
2296-2565 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
In managing the COVID-19 pandemic, several compelling narratives seem to have played a significant role in the decision-making processes regarding which risk mitigation and management measures to implement. Many countries were to a large extent unprepared for such a situation, even though predictions about a significant probability for a pandemic to occur existed, and national governments of several countries often acted in an uncoordinated manner, which resulted in many inconsistencies in the disaster risk reduction processes. Limited evidence has also made room for strategic narratives meant to persuade the public of the chosen set of actions, even though the degree of uncertainty regarding the outcomes of these was high, further complicating the situation. In this article, we assume a normative standpoint regarding rhapsodic decision making and suggest an integrated framework for a more elaborated decision analysis under the ambiguity of how to contain the virus spread from a policy point of view, while considering epidemiologic estimations and socioeconomic factors in a multi-stakeholder-multi-criteria context based on a co-creative work process for eliciting attitudes, perceptions, as well as preferences amongst relevant stakeholder groups. The framework, applied in our paper on Romania for demonstrative purposes, is used for evaluating mitigation measures for catastrophic events such as the COVID-19 situation, to mobilize better response strategies for future scenarios related to pandemics and other hazardous events, as well as to structure the production and analysis of narratives on the current pandemic effects. |
topic |
multi-criteria decision analysis managing and mitigating the risk of COVID 19 pandemic risk governance SEIR models participation and inclusion |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.583706/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT loveekenberg amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT loveekenberg amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT loveekenberg amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT adrianamihai amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT adrianamihai amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT tobiasfasth amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT tobiasfasth amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT nadejdakomendantova amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT nadejdakomendantova amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT matsdanielson amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT matsdanielson amulticriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT loveekenberg multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT loveekenberg multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT loveekenberg multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT adrianamihai multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT adrianamihai multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT tobiasfasth multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT tobiasfasth multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT nadejdakomendantova multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT nadejdakomendantova multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT matsdanielson multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures AT matsdanielson multicriteriaframeworkforpandemicresponsemeasures |
_version_ |
1721517662620614656 |