Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.
Concerns exist within the medical and psychological sciences that many published research findings are not replicable. Guidelines accordingly recommend that the file drawer effect should be eliminated and that statistical significance should not be a criterion in the decision to submit and publish s...
Main Authors: | Joost de Winter, Riender Happee |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3688764?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Takeover Quality: Assessing the Effects of Time Budget and Traffic Density with the Help of a Trajectory-Planning Method
by: Fabian Doubek, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles: Results from a Large Cross-National Questionnaire Study
by: Sina Nordhoff, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results.
by: Marcel A L M van Assen, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Some Effects of Crosswind on the Lateral Dynamics of a Bicycle
by: A. L. Schwab, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01) -
Effects of User Interfaces on Take-Over Performance: A Review of the Empirical Evidence
by: Soyeon Kim, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)