Art and the critique of the enlightenment

Summary The aim of this paper is to provide an examination of the concept of aesthetic rationality in the philosophy of art of Theodor W. Adorno, related to his celebrated critique of the enlightenment in The Dialectic of the Enlightenment written with Max Horkheimer. Our main purpose is to show...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Novaković Marko
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2010-01-01
Series:Filozofija i Društvo
Subjects:
art
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2010/0353-57381003119N.pdf
id doaj-e4050c9939404f9ca49a0a1e703c371c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4050c9939404f9ca49a0a1e703c371c2020-11-25T00:57:54ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382010-01-0121311914410.2298/FID1003119NArt and the critique of the enlightenmentNovaković MarkoSummary The aim of this paper is to provide an examination of the concept of aesthetic rationality in the philosophy of art of Theodor W. Adorno, related to his celebrated critique of the enlightenment in The Dialectic of the Enlightenment written with Max Horkheimer. Our main purpose is to show how Adorno’s conception of art responds to a problem posed in the former study, namely that of a dialectical self-enchantment and alienation of subjective reason. In the first two sections is shown how self-preservation of subjective reason leads to its fall into the realm of myth. This turn was dialectically exposed in Adorno’s interpretation of Odysseus’ voyage as prahistory of subjectivity. The next four chapters expose a necessity and mode of critical approach and possibility of a transcendence of this mythical reality of reification in the structure of works of art, especially their form, with its ultimate goal to free individuals from social injustice and unconscious enslavement. Adorno’s account of the dialectics of aesthetic semblance, artistic truth content and immanent law of its form which embodies the consciousness of non-identity provides an ex­planation how modern art mimetically manages to transcend conditions of empirical reality and at the same time offers a plausible model of a “transitive“ rationality, which serves to discover its better possibilities. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2010/0353-57381003119N.pdfrationalizationmythreasonmimesisarttruth contentformenlightenment
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Novaković Marko
spellingShingle Novaković Marko
Art and the critique of the enlightenment
Filozofija i Društvo
rationalization
myth
reason
mimesis
art
truth content
form
enlightenment
author_facet Novaković Marko
author_sort Novaković Marko
title Art and the critique of the enlightenment
title_short Art and the critique of the enlightenment
title_full Art and the critique of the enlightenment
title_fullStr Art and the critique of the enlightenment
title_full_unstemmed Art and the critique of the enlightenment
title_sort art and the critique of the enlightenment
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
series Filozofija i Društvo
issn 0353-5738
publishDate 2010-01-01
description Summary The aim of this paper is to provide an examination of the concept of aesthetic rationality in the philosophy of art of Theodor W. Adorno, related to his celebrated critique of the enlightenment in The Dialectic of the Enlightenment written with Max Horkheimer. Our main purpose is to show how Adorno’s conception of art responds to a problem posed in the former study, namely that of a dialectical self-enchantment and alienation of subjective reason. In the first two sections is shown how self-preservation of subjective reason leads to its fall into the realm of myth. This turn was dialectically exposed in Adorno’s interpretation of Odysseus’ voyage as prahistory of subjectivity. The next four chapters expose a necessity and mode of critical approach and possibility of a transcendence of this mythical reality of reification in the structure of works of art, especially their form, with its ultimate goal to free individuals from social injustice and unconscious enslavement. Adorno’s account of the dialectics of aesthetic semblance, artistic truth content and immanent law of its form which embodies the consciousness of non-identity provides an ex­planation how modern art mimetically manages to transcend conditions of empirical reality and at the same time offers a plausible model of a “transitive“ rationality, which serves to discover its better possibilities.
topic rationalization
myth
reason
mimesis
art
truth content
form
enlightenment
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2010/0353-57381003119N.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT novakovicmarko artandthecritiqueoftheenlightenment
_version_ 1725222299648393216