Art and the critique of the enlightenment
Summary The aim of this paper is to provide an examination of the concept of aesthetic rationality in the philosophy of art of Theodor W. Adorno, related to his celebrated critique of the enlightenment in The Dialectic of the Enlightenment written with Max Horkheimer. Our main purpose is to show...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Filozofija i Društvo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2010/0353-57381003119N.pdf |
id |
doaj-e4050c9939404f9ca49a0a1e703c371c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e4050c9939404f9ca49a0a1e703c371c2020-11-25T00:57:54ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382010-01-0121311914410.2298/FID1003119NArt and the critique of the enlightenmentNovaković MarkoSummary The aim of this paper is to provide an examination of the concept of aesthetic rationality in the philosophy of art of Theodor W. Adorno, related to his celebrated critique of the enlightenment in The Dialectic of the Enlightenment written with Max Horkheimer. Our main purpose is to show how Adorno’s conception of art responds to a problem posed in the former study, namely that of a dialectical self-enchantment and alienation of subjective reason. In the first two sections is shown how self-preservation of subjective reason leads to its fall into the realm of myth. This turn was dialectically exposed in Adorno’s interpretation of Odysseus’ voyage as prahistory of subjectivity. The next four chapters expose a necessity and mode of critical approach and possibility of a transcendence of this mythical reality of reification in the structure of works of art, especially their form, with its ultimate goal to free individuals from social injustice and unconscious enslavement. Adorno’s account of the dialectics of aesthetic semblance, artistic truth content and immanent law of its form which embodies the consciousness of non-identity provides an explanation how modern art mimetically manages to transcend conditions of empirical reality and at the same time offers a plausible model of a “transitive“ rationality, which serves to discover its better possibilities. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2010/0353-57381003119N.pdfrationalizationmythreasonmimesisarttruth contentformenlightenment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Novaković Marko |
spellingShingle |
Novaković Marko Art and the critique of the enlightenment Filozofija i Društvo rationalization myth reason mimesis art truth content form enlightenment |
author_facet |
Novaković Marko |
author_sort |
Novaković Marko |
title |
Art and the critique of the enlightenment |
title_short |
Art and the critique of the enlightenment |
title_full |
Art and the critique of the enlightenment |
title_fullStr |
Art and the critique of the enlightenment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Art and the critique of the enlightenment |
title_sort |
art and the critique of the enlightenment |
publisher |
Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade |
series |
Filozofija i Društvo |
issn |
0353-5738 |
publishDate |
2010-01-01 |
description |
Summary The aim of this paper is to provide an examination of the concept of aesthetic rationality in the philosophy of art of Theodor W. Adorno, related to his celebrated critique of the enlightenment in The Dialectic of the Enlightenment written with Max Horkheimer. Our main purpose is to show how Adorno’s conception of art responds to a problem posed in the former study, namely that of a dialectical self-enchantment and alienation of subjective reason. In the first two sections is shown how self-preservation of subjective reason leads to its fall into the realm of myth. This turn was dialectically exposed in Adorno’s interpretation of Odysseus’ voyage as prahistory of subjectivity. The next four chapters expose a necessity and mode of critical approach and possibility of a transcendence of this mythical reality of reification in the structure of works of art, especially their form, with its ultimate goal to free individuals from social injustice and unconscious enslavement. Adorno’s account of the dialectics of aesthetic semblance, artistic truth content and immanent law of its form which embodies the consciousness of non-identity provides an explanation how modern art mimetically manages to transcend conditions of empirical reality and at the same time offers a plausible model of a “transitive“ rationality, which serves to discover its better possibilities. |
topic |
rationalization myth reason mimesis art truth content form enlightenment |
url |
http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2010/0353-57381003119N.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT novakovicmarko artandthecritiqueoftheenlightenment |
_version_ |
1725222299648393216 |