Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits

Abstract Background It has been suggested that attempts to eradicate populations of tsetse (Glossina spp.) using stationary targets might fail because smaller, less mobile individuals are unlikely to be killed by the targets. If true, tsetse caught in stationary traps should be larger than those fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Hargrove, Sinead English, Stephen J. Torr, Jennifer Lord, Lee Rafuse Haines, Cari van Schalkwyk, James Patterson, Glyn Vale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13071-018-3274-x
id doaj-e4017c25c35b4c8da626f63d214d7220
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4017c25c35b4c8da626f63d214d72202020-11-25T01:28:53ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052019-01-0112111310.1186/s13071-018-3274-xWing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baitsJohn Hargrove0Sinead English1Stephen J. Torr2Jennifer Lord3Lee Rafuse Haines4Cari van Schalkwyk5James Patterson6Glyn Vale7SACEMA, University of StellenboschSchool of Biological Sciences, University of BristolLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineSACEMA, University of StellenboschLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineSACEMA, University of StellenboschAbstract Background It has been suggested that attempts to eradicate populations of tsetse (Glossina spp.) using stationary targets might fail because smaller, less mobile individuals are unlikely to be killed by the targets. If true, tsetse caught in stationary traps should be larger than those from mobile baits, which require less mobility on the part of the flies. Results Sampling tsetse in the Zambezi Valley of Zimbabwe, we found that the number of tsetse caught from stationary traps, as a percent of total numbers from traps plus a mobile vehicle, was ~5% for male G. morsitans morsitans (mean wing length 5.830 mm; 95% CI: 5.800–5.859 mm) and ~10% for females (6.334 mm; 95% CI: 6.329–6.338 mm); for G. pallidipes the figures were ~50% for males (6.830 mm; 95% CI: 6.821–6.838 mm) and ~75% for females (7.303 mm, 95% CI: 7.302–7.305 mm). As expected, flies of the smaller species (and the smaller sex) were less likely to be captured using stationary, rather than mobile sampling devices. For flies of a given sex and species the situation was more complex. Multivariable analysis showed that, for females of both species, wing lengths changed with ovarian age and the month, year and method of capture. For G. pallidipes, there were statistically significant interactions between ovarian age and capture month, year and method. For G. m. morsitans, there was only a significant interaction between ovarian age and capture month. The effect of capture method was, however, small in absolute terms: for G. pallidipes and G. m. morsitans flies caught on the mobile vehicle had wings only 0.24 and 0.48% shorter, respectively, than flies caught in stationary traps. In summary, wing length in field samples of tsetse varies with ovarian age, capture month and year and, weakly, with capture method. Suggestions that a target-based operation against G. f. fuscipes in Kenya caused a shift towards a smaller, less mobile population of tsetse, unavailable to the targets, failed to account for factors other than capture method. Conclusions The results are consistent with the successful use of targets to eradicate populations of tsetse in Zimbabwe. Until further, more nuanced, studies are conducted, it is premature to conclude that targets alone could not, similarly, be used to eradicate G. f. fuscipes populations in Kenya.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13071-018-3274-xTsetse GlossinaEradication using targetsStationary and mobile baitsWing lengthAge season annual effects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Hargrove
Sinead English
Stephen J. Torr
Jennifer Lord
Lee Rafuse Haines
Cari van Schalkwyk
James Patterson
Glyn Vale
spellingShingle John Hargrove
Sinead English
Stephen J. Torr
Jennifer Lord
Lee Rafuse Haines
Cari van Schalkwyk
James Patterson
Glyn Vale
Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
Parasites & Vectors
Tsetse Glossina
Eradication using targets
Stationary and mobile baits
Wing length
Age season annual effects
author_facet John Hargrove
Sinead English
Stephen J. Torr
Jennifer Lord
Lee Rafuse Haines
Cari van Schalkwyk
James Patterson
Glyn Vale
author_sort John Hargrove
title Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
title_short Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
title_full Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
title_fullStr Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
title_full_unstemmed Wing length and host location in tsetse (Glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
title_sort wing length and host location in tsetse (glossina spp.): implications for control using stationary baits
publisher BMC
series Parasites & Vectors
issn 1756-3305
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Abstract Background It has been suggested that attempts to eradicate populations of tsetse (Glossina spp.) using stationary targets might fail because smaller, less mobile individuals are unlikely to be killed by the targets. If true, tsetse caught in stationary traps should be larger than those from mobile baits, which require less mobility on the part of the flies. Results Sampling tsetse in the Zambezi Valley of Zimbabwe, we found that the number of tsetse caught from stationary traps, as a percent of total numbers from traps plus a mobile vehicle, was ~5% for male G. morsitans morsitans (mean wing length 5.830 mm; 95% CI: 5.800–5.859 mm) and ~10% for females (6.334 mm; 95% CI: 6.329–6.338 mm); for G. pallidipes the figures were ~50% for males (6.830 mm; 95% CI: 6.821–6.838 mm) and ~75% for females (7.303 mm, 95% CI: 7.302–7.305 mm). As expected, flies of the smaller species (and the smaller sex) were less likely to be captured using stationary, rather than mobile sampling devices. For flies of a given sex and species the situation was more complex. Multivariable analysis showed that, for females of both species, wing lengths changed with ovarian age and the month, year and method of capture. For G. pallidipes, there were statistically significant interactions between ovarian age and capture month, year and method. For G. m. morsitans, there was only a significant interaction between ovarian age and capture month. The effect of capture method was, however, small in absolute terms: for G. pallidipes and G. m. morsitans flies caught on the mobile vehicle had wings only 0.24 and 0.48% shorter, respectively, than flies caught in stationary traps. In summary, wing length in field samples of tsetse varies with ovarian age, capture month and year and, weakly, with capture method. Suggestions that a target-based operation against G. f. fuscipes in Kenya caused a shift towards a smaller, less mobile population of tsetse, unavailable to the targets, failed to account for factors other than capture method. Conclusions The results are consistent with the successful use of targets to eradicate populations of tsetse in Zimbabwe. Until further, more nuanced, studies are conducted, it is premature to conclude that targets alone could not, similarly, be used to eradicate G. f. fuscipes populations in Kenya.
topic Tsetse Glossina
Eradication using targets
Stationary and mobile baits
Wing length
Age season annual effects
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13071-018-3274-x
work_keys_str_mv AT johnhargrove winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT sineadenglish winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT stephenjtorr winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT jenniferlord winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT leerafusehaines winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT carivanschalkwyk winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT jamespatterson winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
AT glynvale winglengthandhostlocationintsetseglossinasppimplicationsforcontrolusingstationarybaits
_version_ 1725099773328883712