Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics

Abstract Background Solitary death (kodokushi) has recently become recognized as a social issue in Japan. The social isolation of older people leads to death without dignity. With the outbreak of COVID-19, efforts to eliminate solitary death need to be adjusted in line with changes in lifestyle and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eisuke Nakazawa, Keiichiro Yamamoto, Alex John London, Akira Akabayashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00657-9
id doaj-e3f86fdaf6634799a2a2468962d78ab2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3f86fdaf6634799a2a2468962d78ab22021-07-11T11:03:44ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392021-07-0122111010.1186/s12910-021-00657-9Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethicsEisuke Nakazawa0Keiichiro Yamamoto1Alex John London2Akira Akabayashi3Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of TokyoOffice of Bioethics, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and MedicineDepartment of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon UniversityDepartment of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of TokyoAbstract Background Solitary death (kodokushi) has recently become recognized as a social issue in Japan. The social isolation of older people leads to death without dignity. With the outbreak of COVID-19, efforts to eliminate solitary death need to be adjusted in line with changes in lifestyle and accompanying changes in social structure. Health monitoring services that utilize wearable devices may contribute to this end. Our goals are to outline how wearable devices might be used to (1) detect emergency situations involving solitary older people and swiftly connect them with medical treatment, to (2) reduce the frequency of deaths that remain undiscovered and (3) to reduce social isolation by promoting social interaction. Methods Theoretical and philosophical approaches were adopted to examine ethical issues surrounding the application of wearable devices and cloud-based information processing systems to prevent solitary death in the world with/after COVID-19. Main body (1) Technology cannot replace social connections; without social support necessary to foster understanding of the benefits of health management through wearable devices among older adults, such devices may remain unused, or not used properly. (2) Maturity of the technology; systems face the difficult task of detecting and responding to a wide range of health conditions and life-threatening events in time to avert avoidable morbidity and mortality. (3) Autonomy and personhood; promoting the voluntary use of wearable devices that are a part of larger efforts to connect isolated individuals to a community or social services might be effective. Legal force should be avoided if possible. There is some concern that landlords may require an older person to sign a contract agreeing to wear a device. The autonomy of solitary older people should be respected. (4) Governance: policies must be developed to limit access to data from wearables and the purposes for which data can be used. Conclusion If thoughtfully deployed under proper policy constraints, wearable devices offer a way to connect solitary older people to health services and could reduce cases of solitary death while respecting the personhood of the user.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00657-9Solitary deathPublic healthEthicsCOVID-19Wearable deviceAutonomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eisuke Nakazawa
Keiichiro Yamamoto
Alex John London
Akira Akabayashi
spellingShingle Eisuke Nakazawa
Keiichiro Yamamoto
Alex John London
Akira Akabayashi
Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
BMC Medical Ethics
Solitary death
Public health
Ethics
COVID-19
Wearable device
Autonomy
author_facet Eisuke Nakazawa
Keiichiro Yamamoto
Alex John London
Akira Akabayashi
author_sort Eisuke Nakazawa
title Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
title_short Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
title_full Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
title_fullStr Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
title_full_unstemmed Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
title_sort solitary death and new lifestyles during and after covid-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Solitary death (kodokushi) has recently become recognized as a social issue in Japan. The social isolation of older people leads to death without dignity. With the outbreak of COVID-19, efforts to eliminate solitary death need to be adjusted in line with changes in lifestyle and accompanying changes in social structure. Health monitoring services that utilize wearable devices may contribute to this end. Our goals are to outline how wearable devices might be used to (1) detect emergency situations involving solitary older people and swiftly connect them with medical treatment, to (2) reduce the frequency of deaths that remain undiscovered and (3) to reduce social isolation by promoting social interaction. Methods Theoretical and philosophical approaches were adopted to examine ethical issues surrounding the application of wearable devices and cloud-based information processing systems to prevent solitary death in the world with/after COVID-19. Main body (1) Technology cannot replace social connections; without social support necessary to foster understanding of the benefits of health management through wearable devices among older adults, such devices may remain unused, or not used properly. (2) Maturity of the technology; systems face the difficult task of detecting and responding to a wide range of health conditions and life-threatening events in time to avert avoidable morbidity and mortality. (3) Autonomy and personhood; promoting the voluntary use of wearable devices that are a part of larger efforts to connect isolated individuals to a community or social services might be effective. Legal force should be avoided if possible. There is some concern that landlords may require an older person to sign a contract agreeing to wear a device. The autonomy of solitary older people should be respected. (4) Governance: policies must be developed to limit access to data from wearables and the purposes for which data can be used. Conclusion If thoughtfully deployed under proper policy constraints, wearable devices offer a way to connect solitary older people to health services and could reduce cases of solitary death while respecting the personhood of the user.
topic Solitary death
Public health
Ethics
COVID-19
Wearable device
Autonomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00657-9
work_keys_str_mv AT eisukenakazawa solitarydeathandnewlifestylesduringandaftercovid19wearabledevicesandpublichealthethics
AT keiichiroyamamoto solitarydeathandnewlifestylesduringandaftercovid19wearabledevicesandpublichealthethics
AT alexjohnlondon solitarydeathandnewlifestylesduringandaftercovid19wearabledevicesandpublichealthethics
AT akiraakabayashi solitarydeathandnewlifestylesduringandaftercovid19wearabledevicesandpublichealthethics
_version_ 1721309536994721792