A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre

Objectives: Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Biosimilar G-CSF is now approved for use, based on comparable efficacy, safety and quality with the originator product. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karl Verpoort MD, Thomas M. Möhler MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-11-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834012461330
id doaj-e3d0458ea404440c94940bebe8a190e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3d0458ea404440c94940bebe8a190e52020-11-25T02:59:17ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology1758-83401758-83592012-11-01410.1177/1758834012461330A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centreKarl Verpoort MDThomas M. Möhler MD, PhDObjectives: Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Biosimilar G-CSF is now approved for use, based on comparable efficacy, safety and quality with the originator product. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients’ charts following the switch from originator G-CSF (Neupogen ® ) to biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio ® /Filgrastim Hexal ® ) in a large community oncology practice. A total of 77 consecutive patients with cancer who received biosimilar G-CSF were reviewed, as were 25 patients who received originator G-CSF at the same centre. Results: The median age of patients in the biosimilar G-CSF cohort was 67 years (range 20−83). In this cohort 48% had chemotherapy with a febrile neutropenia risk of >20%. Biosimilar G-CSF was given as primary prophylaxis in 52% and as secondary prophylaxis in 48% of patients. Age and febrile neutropenia in medical history or in previous chemotherapy were factors that triggered the use of G-CSF in patients with a febrile neutropenia risk of <20%. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in five patients (6.5%) and discontinuation in two patients (2.5%). No unexpected safety findings were observed. Patient characteristics were generally similar in the originator G-CSF cohort. Only 24% of patients had a febrile neutropenia risk >20% and 36% received primary prophylactic G-CSF. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in two patients (8%) and discontinuation in two patients (8%). Conclusions: Biosimilar G-CSF was effective and prevented dose reductions/discontinuation in the majority of patients. Biosimilar G-CSF was considered clinically comparable to its reference product.https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834012461330
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karl Verpoort MD
Thomas M. Möhler MD, PhD
spellingShingle Karl Verpoort MD
Thomas M. Möhler MD, PhD
A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
author_facet Karl Verpoort MD
Thomas M. Möhler MD, PhD
author_sort Karl Verpoort MD
title A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
title_short A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
title_full A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
title_fullStr A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
title_full_unstemmed A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
title_sort non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
issn 1758-8340
1758-8359
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Objectives: Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the severity of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Biosimilar G-CSF is now approved for use, based on comparable efficacy, safety and quality with the originator product. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients’ charts following the switch from originator G-CSF (Neupogen ® ) to biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio ® /Filgrastim Hexal ® ) in a large community oncology practice. A total of 77 consecutive patients with cancer who received biosimilar G-CSF were reviewed, as were 25 patients who received originator G-CSF at the same centre. Results: The median age of patients in the biosimilar G-CSF cohort was 67 years (range 20−83). In this cohort 48% had chemotherapy with a febrile neutropenia risk of >20%. Biosimilar G-CSF was given as primary prophylaxis in 52% and as secondary prophylaxis in 48% of patients. Age and febrile neutropenia in medical history or in previous chemotherapy were factors that triggered the use of G-CSF in patients with a febrile neutropenia risk of <20%. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in five patients (6.5%) and discontinuation in two patients (2.5%). No unexpected safety findings were observed. Patient characteristics were generally similar in the originator G-CSF cohort. Only 24% of patients had a febrile neutropenia risk >20% and 36% received primary prophylactic G-CSF. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia led to chemotherapy dose reductions in two patients (8%) and discontinuation in two patients (8%). Conclusions: Biosimilar G-CSF was effective and prevented dose reductions/discontinuation in the majority of patients. Biosimilar G-CSF was considered clinically comparable to its reference product.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834012461330
work_keys_str_mv AT karlverpoortmd anoninterventionalstudyofbiosimilargranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorasprophylaxisforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniainacommunityoncologycentre
AT thomasmmohlermdphd anoninterventionalstudyofbiosimilargranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorasprophylaxisforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniainacommunityoncologycentre
AT karlverpoortmd noninterventionalstudyofbiosimilargranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorasprophylaxisforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniainacommunityoncologycentre
AT thomasmmohlermdphd noninterventionalstudyofbiosimilargranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorasprophylaxisforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniainacommunityoncologycentre
_version_ 1724703246612692992