Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment

This paper discusses a choice of the most rational reinforcement details for frame corners subjected to opening bending moment. Frame corners formed from elements of both the same and different cross section heights are considered. The case of corners formed of elements of different cross section is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michał Szczecina, Andrzej Winnicki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3438
id doaj-e3bf81591d534ec58ed9d3e76d7c9612
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3bf81591d534ec58ed9d3e76d7c96122021-07-01T00:47:43ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-06-01143438343810.3390/ma14123438Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending MomentMichał Szczecina0Andrzej Winnicki1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, PolandFaculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, PolandThis paper discusses a choice of the most rational reinforcement details for frame corners subjected to opening bending moment. Frame corners formed from elements of both the same and different cross section heights are considered. The case of corners formed of elements of different cross section is not considered in Eurocode 2 and is very rarely described in handbooks. Several reinforcement details with both the same and different cross section heights are presented. The authors introduce a new reinforcement detail for the different cross section heights. The considered details are comprised of the primary reinforcement in the form of straight bars and loops and the additional reinforcement in the form of diagonal bars or stirrups or a combination of both diagonal stirrups and bars. Two methods of static analysis, strut-and-tie method (S&T) and finite element method (FEM), are used in the research. FEM calculations are performed with Abaqus software using the Concrete Damaged Plasticity model (CDP) for concrete and the classical metal plasticity model for reinforcing steel. The crucial CDP parameters, relaxation time and dilatation angle, were calibrated in numerical tests in Abaqus. The analysis of results from the S&T and FE methods allowed for the determination of the most rational reinforcement details.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3438concretematerial modelConcrete Damaged Plasticity modelopening bending momentreinforced concrete frame cornersstrut-and-tie method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michał Szczecina
Andrzej Winnicki
spellingShingle Michał Szczecina
Andrzej Winnicki
Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
Materials
concrete
material model
Concrete Damaged Plasticity model
opening bending moment
reinforced concrete frame corners
strut-and-tie method
author_facet Michał Szczecina
Andrzej Winnicki
author_sort Michał Szczecina
title Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
title_short Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
title_full Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
title_fullStr Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
title_full_unstemmed Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
title_sort rational choice of reinforcement of reinforced concrete frame corners subjected to opening bending moment
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This paper discusses a choice of the most rational reinforcement details for frame corners subjected to opening bending moment. Frame corners formed from elements of both the same and different cross section heights are considered. The case of corners formed of elements of different cross section is not considered in Eurocode 2 and is very rarely described in handbooks. Several reinforcement details with both the same and different cross section heights are presented. The authors introduce a new reinforcement detail for the different cross section heights. The considered details are comprised of the primary reinforcement in the form of straight bars and loops and the additional reinforcement in the form of diagonal bars or stirrups or a combination of both diagonal stirrups and bars. Two methods of static analysis, strut-and-tie method (S&T) and finite element method (FEM), are used in the research. FEM calculations are performed with Abaqus software using the Concrete Damaged Plasticity model (CDP) for concrete and the classical metal plasticity model for reinforcing steel. The crucial CDP parameters, relaxation time and dilatation angle, were calibrated in numerical tests in Abaqus. The analysis of results from the S&T and FE methods allowed for the determination of the most rational reinforcement details.
topic concrete
material model
Concrete Damaged Plasticity model
opening bending moment
reinforced concrete frame corners
strut-and-tie method
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3438
work_keys_str_mv AT michałszczecina rationalchoiceofreinforcementofreinforcedconcreteframecornerssubjectedtoopeningbendingmoment
AT andrzejwinnicki rationalchoiceofreinforcementofreinforcedconcreteframecornerssubjectedtoopeningbendingmoment
_version_ 1721347679868420096