Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment
This paper discusses a choice of the most rational reinforcement details for frame corners subjected to opening bending moment. Frame corners formed from elements of both the same and different cross section heights are considered. The case of corners formed of elements of different cross section is...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3438 |
id |
doaj-e3bf81591d534ec58ed9d3e76d7c9612 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e3bf81591d534ec58ed9d3e76d7c96122021-07-01T00:47:43ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-06-01143438343810.3390/ma14123438Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending MomentMichał Szczecina0Andrzej Winnicki1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kielce University of Technology, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, PolandFaculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, PolandThis paper discusses a choice of the most rational reinforcement details for frame corners subjected to opening bending moment. Frame corners formed from elements of both the same and different cross section heights are considered. The case of corners formed of elements of different cross section is not considered in Eurocode 2 and is very rarely described in handbooks. Several reinforcement details with both the same and different cross section heights are presented. The authors introduce a new reinforcement detail for the different cross section heights. The considered details are comprised of the primary reinforcement in the form of straight bars and loops and the additional reinforcement in the form of diagonal bars or stirrups or a combination of both diagonal stirrups and bars. Two methods of static analysis, strut-and-tie method (S&T) and finite element method (FEM), are used in the research. FEM calculations are performed with Abaqus software using the Concrete Damaged Plasticity model (CDP) for concrete and the classical metal plasticity model for reinforcing steel. The crucial CDP parameters, relaxation time and dilatation angle, were calibrated in numerical tests in Abaqus. The analysis of results from the S&T and FE methods allowed for the determination of the most rational reinforcement details.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3438concretematerial modelConcrete Damaged Plasticity modelopening bending momentreinforced concrete frame cornersstrut-and-tie method |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michał Szczecina Andrzej Winnicki |
spellingShingle |
Michał Szczecina Andrzej Winnicki Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment Materials concrete material model Concrete Damaged Plasticity model opening bending moment reinforced concrete frame corners strut-and-tie method |
author_facet |
Michał Szczecina Andrzej Winnicki |
author_sort |
Michał Szczecina |
title |
Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment |
title_short |
Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment |
title_full |
Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment |
title_fullStr |
Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rational Choice of Reinforcement of Reinforced Concrete Frame Corners Subjected to Opening Bending Moment |
title_sort |
rational choice of reinforcement of reinforced concrete frame corners subjected to opening bending moment |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Materials |
issn |
1996-1944 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
This paper discusses a choice of the most rational reinforcement details for frame corners subjected to opening bending moment. Frame corners formed from elements of both the same and different cross section heights are considered. The case of corners formed of elements of different cross section is not considered in Eurocode 2 and is very rarely described in handbooks. Several reinforcement details with both the same and different cross section heights are presented. The authors introduce a new reinforcement detail for the different cross section heights. The considered details are comprised of the primary reinforcement in the form of straight bars and loops and the additional reinforcement in the form of diagonal bars or stirrups or a combination of both diagonal stirrups and bars. Two methods of static analysis, strut-and-tie method (S&T) and finite element method (FEM), are used in the research. FEM calculations are performed with Abaqus software using the Concrete Damaged Plasticity model (CDP) for concrete and the classical metal plasticity model for reinforcing steel. The crucial CDP parameters, relaxation time and dilatation angle, were calibrated in numerical tests in Abaqus. The analysis of results from the S&T and FE methods allowed for the determination of the most rational reinforcement details. |
topic |
concrete material model Concrete Damaged Plasticity model opening bending moment reinforced concrete frame corners strut-and-tie method |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/12/3438 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michałszczecina rationalchoiceofreinforcementofreinforcedconcreteframecornerssubjectedtoopeningbendingmoment AT andrzejwinnicki rationalchoiceofreinforcementofreinforcedconcreteframecornerssubjectedtoopeningbendingmoment |
_version_ |
1721347679868420096 |