AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation

Introduction The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver cancer is a desirable treatment option, as it is minimally invasive. An accurate numerical simulation can greatly help physicians better plan their surgical protocols. Previously, the displacement current in the RFA process was considered negli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chieh-feng Chang, Hsuan-Yu Kuo, Jo-Ping Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hyperthermia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1971779
id doaj-e3b4ce6cff644b8882c7a4fe16951511
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3b4ce6cff644b8882c7a4fe169515112021-09-24T14:41:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Hyperthermia0265-67361464-51572021-01-013811322133210.1080/02656736.2021.19717791971779AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablationChieh-feng Chang0Hsuan-Yu Kuo1Jo-Ping Lee2Biomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research InstituteBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research InstituteBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research InstituteIntroduction The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver cancer is a desirable treatment option, as it is minimally invasive. An accurate numerical simulation can greatly help physicians better plan their surgical protocols. Previously, the displacement current in the RFA process was considered negligible, and therefore RFA simulation was modeled as a direct current (DC) system instead of an alternating current (AC) system. Our study investigated the hypothesis that the displacement current in the RFA process should not always be considered negligible. Methods AC measurements of ex vivo bovine liver ablation were performed, and numerical simulations were also conducted to test the hypothesis that the relative permittivity would significantly decrease after the liver tissue reached a high temperature. Results The displacement current was observed to be a sizable fraction of the conduction current, especially before the onset of the first pause. The simulation results indicated that the relative permittivity is likely to decrease to several hundred or lower at elevated temperatures. Conclusions Our study results suggest that the DC model may be inadequate, especially before the first roll-off and that additional information could be available during RFA treatment by considering the AC nature of RFA, which could lead to improved numerical simulation. Additional measurements of tissue parameters are needed to reach the full potential of the AC model for further development of ablation control.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1971779radiofrequency ablation (rfa)alternating current (ac)relative permittivitydielectric constantphasefinite element method (fem) simulationbovine liver
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chieh-feng Chang
Hsuan-Yu Kuo
Jo-Ping Lee
spellingShingle Chieh-feng Chang
Hsuan-Yu Kuo
Jo-Ping Lee
AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
International Journal of Hyperthermia
radiofrequency ablation (rfa)
alternating current (ac)
relative permittivity
dielectric constant
phase
finite element method (fem) simulation
bovine liver
author_facet Chieh-feng Chang
Hsuan-Yu Kuo
Jo-Ping Lee
author_sort Chieh-feng Chang
title AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
title_short AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
title_full AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
title_fullStr AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
title_full_unstemmed AC measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
title_sort ac measurements and simulations of hepatic radiofrequency ablation
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Hyperthermia
issn 0265-6736
1464-5157
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Introduction The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver cancer is a desirable treatment option, as it is minimally invasive. An accurate numerical simulation can greatly help physicians better plan their surgical protocols. Previously, the displacement current in the RFA process was considered negligible, and therefore RFA simulation was modeled as a direct current (DC) system instead of an alternating current (AC) system. Our study investigated the hypothesis that the displacement current in the RFA process should not always be considered negligible. Methods AC measurements of ex vivo bovine liver ablation were performed, and numerical simulations were also conducted to test the hypothesis that the relative permittivity would significantly decrease after the liver tissue reached a high temperature. Results The displacement current was observed to be a sizable fraction of the conduction current, especially before the onset of the first pause. The simulation results indicated that the relative permittivity is likely to decrease to several hundred or lower at elevated temperatures. Conclusions Our study results suggest that the DC model may be inadequate, especially before the first roll-off and that additional information could be available during RFA treatment by considering the AC nature of RFA, which could lead to improved numerical simulation. Additional measurements of tissue parameters are needed to reach the full potential of the AC model for further development of ablation control.
topic radiofrequency ablation (rfa)
alternating current (ac)
relative permittivity
dielectric constant
phase
finite element method (fem) simulation
bovine liver
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1971779
work_keys_str_mv AT chiehfengchang acmeasurementsandsimulationsofhepaticradiofrequencyablation
AT hsuanyukuo acmeasurementsandsimulationsofhepaticradiofrequencyablation
AT jopinglee acmeasurementsandsimulationsofhepaticradiofrequencyablation
_version_ 1717369793100644352