Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya)
Q’anjob’al typically makes a rigid distinction between transitive and intransitive verb inflections. Transitive verbs cross-reference their subjects with an ergative prefix while intransitive verbs cross-reference their subjects with an absolutive prefix. Transitive verbs have one set of status suff...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Kansas, Department of Linguistics
2009-01-01
|
Series: | Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1808/5722 |
id |
doaj-e3a61ec66bb348ea9e0cfe1f1a4e8b8b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e3a61ec66bb348ea9e0cfe1f1a4e8b8b2020-11-24T21:21:36ZengUniversity of Kansas, Department of LinguisticsKansas Working Papers in Linguistics2378-76002009-01-0131394510.17161/KWPL.1808.5722Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) Mateo, PedroQ’anjob’al typically makes a rigid distinction between transitive and intransitive verb inflections. Transitive verbs cross-reference their subjects with an ergative prefix while intransitive verbs cross-reference their subjects with an absolutive prefix. Transitive verbs have one set of status suffixes, while intransitive verbs have a different set of status suffixes. However, an exception to this rule occurs in complement clauses that lack an aspect marker. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/5722Kanjobal languageMayan languagesGrammar, Comparative and general-- Nominals |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mateo, Pedro |
spellingShingle |
Mateo, Pedro Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics Kanjobal language Mayan languages Grammar, Comparative and general-- Nominals |
author_facet |
Mateo, Pedro |
author_sort |
Mateo, Pedro |
title |
Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) |
title_short |
Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) |
title_full |
Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) |
title_fullStr |
Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nominalization in Q'anjob'al (Maya) |
title_sort |
nominalization in q'anjob'al (maya) |
publisher |
University of Kansas, Department of Linguistics |
series |
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics |
issn |
2378-7600 |
publishDate |
2009-01-01 |
description |
Q’anjob’al typically makes a rigid distinction between transitive and intransitive verb inflections. Transitive verbs cross-reference their subjects with an ergative prefix while intransitive verbs cross-reference their subjects with an absolutive prefix. Transitive verbs have one set of status suffixes, while intransitive verbs have a different set of status suffixes. However, an exception to this rule occurs in complement clauses that lack an aspect marker. |
topic |
Kanjobal language Mayan languages Grammar, Comparative and general-- Nominals |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1808/5722 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateopedro nominalizationinqanjobalmaya |
_version_ |
1725999104986710016 |