Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow

Medical inpatients often have important risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In our institution, VTE prophylaxis in this group was underused. The main barriers identified were inattention to VTE prophylaxis, competing priorities and lack of confidence in the decision-making. We aimed to im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Davies, Hannah Preston, Iain Swan, Simon Dummer, Veiraiah Aravindan, Yuan Ye Beh, Ann Lockman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-01
Series:BMJ Open Quality
Online Access:https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/9/2/e000903.full
id doaj-e39b78b4c7414c47b118eec0fdd2881c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e39b78b4c7414c47b118eec0fdd2881c2020-11-25T03:22:20ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Quality2399-66412020-06-019210.1136/bmjoq-2019-000903Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflowLauren Davies0Hannah Preston1Iain Swan2Simon Dummer3Veiraiah Aravindan4Yuan Ye Beh5Ann Lockman6Great Ormond Street HospitalAcute and General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKAcute and General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKAcute and General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKSPSP Medicines, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh, UKAcute and General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKAcute and General Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKMedical inpatients often have important risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In our institution, VTE prophylaxis in this group was underused. The main barriers identified were inattention to VTE prophylaxis, competing priorities and lack of confidence in the decision-making. We aimed to improve the rate of VTE prophylaxis use by introducing a paper-based risk assessment tool, with actionable management recommendations within the prescription chart. The rationale was that an assessment tool at the point of prescribing can reduce steps between decision-making and prescribing process, thus promoting confidence and acting as a reminder. A total of 552 prescription charts completed over a period of 29 weeks were examined during the baseline period. In the postintervention period, 871 charts completed over 40 weeks period were examined. The risk assessment tool was completed in 51% of the cases examined in the postintervention period. The introduction of the risk assessment tool was associated with a significant change in the pattern of VTE pharmacological prophylaxis use. The change occurred when the form was made highly visible and enclosed in the prescription chart. The pharmacological prophylaxis use was higher with a completed assessment form than without (mean (SD) 97.5% (7.6%) vs 70.1% (19.4%); p<0.0001). The rate of appropriate prophylaxis decision was 98.2% (SD 5.2%) with a completed assessment form, and 80.7% (SD 17.9%) when it was not used. The qualitative interviews revealed positive themes; many users found it useful, easy and convenient to use. Our data have shown that a paper-based VTE risk assessment tool placed within the prescription chart could substantially improve the rate of appropriate assessment and VTE prophylaxis implementation. This suggests that tool clearly needs to be a seamless integration into the workflow to capture users’ attention and mitigate the influence of time perception.https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/9/2/e000903.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauren Davies
Hannah Preston
Iain Swan
Simon Dummer
Veiraiah Aravindan
Yuan Ye Beh
Ann Lockman
spellingShingle Lauren Davies
Hannah Preston
Iain Swan
Simon Dummer
Veiraiah Aravindan
Yuan Ye Beh
Ann Lockman
Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
BMJ Open Quality
author_facet Lauren Davies
Hannah Preston
Iain Swan
Simon Dummer
Veiraiah Aravindan
Yuan Ye Beh
Ann Lockman
author_sort Lauren Davies
title Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
title_short Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
title_full Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
title_fullStr Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
title_full_unstemmed Improving VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
title_sort improving vte risk assessment and prophylaxis prescribing rate in medical patients: integrating risk assessment tool into the workflow
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open Quality
issn 2399-6641
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Medical inpatients often have important risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In our institution, VTE prophylaxis in this group was underused. The main barriers identified were inattention to VTE prophylaxis, competing priorities and lack of confidence in the decision-making. We aimed to improve the rate of VTE prophylaxis use by introducing a paper-based risk assessment tool, with actionable management recommendations within the prescription chart. The rationale was that an assessment tool at the point of prescribing can reduce steps between decision-making and prescribing process, thus promoting confidence and acting as a reminder. A total of 552 prescription charts completed over a period of 29 weeks were examined during the baseline period. In the postintervention period, 871 charts completed over 40 weeks period were examined. The risk assessment tool was completed in 51% of the cases examined in the postintervention period. The introduction of the risk assessment tool was associated with a significant change in the pattern of VTE pharmacological prophylaxis use. The change occurred when the form was made highly visible and enclosed in the prescription chart. The pharmacological prophylaxis use was higher with a completed assessment form than without (mean (SD) 97.5% (7.6%) vs 70.1% (19.4%); p<0.0001). The rate of appropriate prophylaxis decision was 98.2% (SD 5.2%) with a completed assessment form, and 80.7% (SD 17.9%) when it was not used. The qualitative interviews revealed positive themes; many users found it useful, easy and convenient to use. Our data have shown that a paper-based VTE risk assessment tool placed within the prescription chart could substantially improve the rate of appropriate assessment and VTE prophylaxis implementation. This suggests that tool clearly needs to be a seamless integration into the workflow to capture users’ attention and mitigate the influence of time perception.
url https://bmjopenquality.bmj.com/content/9/2/e000903.full
work_keys_str_mv AT laurendavies improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
AT hannahpreston improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
AT iainswan improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
AT simondummer improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
AT veiraiaharavindan improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
AT yuanyebeh improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
AT annlockman improvingvteriskassessmentandprophylaxisprescribingrateinmedicalpatientsintegratingriskassessmenttoolintotheworkflow
_version_ 1724609869072302080