Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices

This paper investigates fast and inexpensive measurement methods for defect detection in parts produced by Additive Manufacturing (AM) with special focus on lattice parts made of ceramics. By Lithography-based Ceramic Manufacturing, parts were built both without defects and with typical defects inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Wilbig, F. Borges de Oliveira, A.-F. Obaton, M. Schwentenwein, K. Rübner, J. Günster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-09-01
Series:Open Ceramics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539520300201
id doaj-e39306f89b544774b962bf021f985baa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e39306f89b544774b962bf021f985baa2020-12-30T04:23:55ZengElsevierOpen Ceramics2666-53952020-09-013100020Defect detection in additively manufactured latticesJ. Wilbig0F. Borges de Oliveira1A.-F. Obaton2M. Schwentenwein3K. Rübner4J. Günster5Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und Prüfung, Unter Den Eichen 44-46, 12203, Berlin, Germany; Corresponding author.Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116, Braunschweig, GermanyLaboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais, 1 Rue Gaston Boissier, 75015, Paris, FranceLithoz GmbH, Mollardgasse 85a/2/64-69, 1060, Vienna, AustriaBundesanstalt für Materialforschung und Prüfung, Unter Den Eichen 44-46, 12203, Berlin, GermanyBundesanstalt für Materialforschung und Prüfung, Unter Den Eichen 44-46, 12203, Berlin, GermanyThis paper investigates fast and inexpensive measurement methods for defect detection in parts produced by Additive Manufacturing (AM) with special focus on lattice parts made of ceramics. By Lithography-based Ceramic Manufacturing, parts were built both without defects and with typical defects intentionally introduced. These defects were investigated and confirmed by industrial X-ray Computed Tomography. Alternative inexpensive methods were applied afterwards on the parts such as weighing, volume determination by Archimedes method and gas permeability measurement. The results showed, that defects resulting in around 20% of change in volume and mass could be separated from parts free of defects by determination of mass or volume. Minor defects were not detectable as they were in the range of process-related fluctuations. Permeability measurement did not allow to safely identify parts with defects. The measurement methods investigated can be easily integrated in AM process chains to support quality control.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539520300201Additive manufacturingQuality assuranceDefect detectionLatticesScaffoldsCeramics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Wilbig
F. Borges de Oliveira
A.-F. Obaton
M. Schwentenwein
K. Rübner
J. Günster
spellingShingle J. Wilbig
F. Borges de Oliveira
A.-F. Obaton
M. Schwentenwein
K. Rübner
J. Günster
Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
Open Ceramics
Additive manufacturing
Quality assurance
Defect detection
Lattices
Scaffolds
Ceramics
author_facet J. Wilbig
F. Borges de Oliveira
A.-F. Obaton
M. Schwentenwein
K. Rübner
J. Günster
author_sort J. Wilbig
title Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
title_short Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
title_full Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
title_fullStr Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
title_full_unstemmed Defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
title_sort defect detection in additively manufactured lattices
publisher Elsevier
series Open Ceramics
issn 2666-5395
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This paper investigates fast and inexpensive measurement methods for defect detection in parts produced by Additive Manufacturing (AM) with special focus on lattice parts made of ceramics. By Lithography-based Ceramic Manufacturing, parts were built both without defects and with typical defects intentionally introduced. These defects were investigated and confirmed by industrial X-ray Computed Tomography. Alternative inexpensive methods were applied afterwards on the parts such as weighing, volume determination by Archimedes method and gas permeability measurement. The results showed, that defects resulting in around 20% of change in volume and mass could be separated from parts free of defects by determination of mass or volume. Minor defects were not detectable as they were in the range of process-related fluctuations. Permeability measurement did not allow to safely identify parts with defects. The measurement methods investigated can be easily integrated in AM process chains to support quality control.
topic Additive manufacturing
Quality assurance
Defect detection
Lattices
Scaffolds
Ceramics
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666539520300201
work_keys_str_mv AT jwilbig defectdetectioninadditivelymanufacturedlattices
AT fborgesdeoliveira defectdetectioninadditivelymanufacturedlattices
AT afobaton defectdetectioninadditivelymanufacturedlattices
AT mschwentenwein defectdetectioninadditivelymanufacturedlattices
AT krubner defectdetectioninadditivelymanufacturedlattices
AT jgunster defectdetectioninadditivelymanufacturedlattices
_version_ 1724366066280300544