Running head: Relative judgment. When the relative judgment theory proved to be false
A commonly accepted theory is that when witnesses can identify culprits in lineups, they will concentrate on him. On the other hand, when they cannot they compare between lineup members and choose the person most similar to the culprit. Therefore they will divide their gaze more equally between foil...
Main Author: | Levi A.M. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Психология и право |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2015/n4/80030.shtml |
Similar Items
-
Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?
by: Matthew Kaesler, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Theoretical vs. empirical discriminability: the application of ROC methods to eyewitness identification
by: John T. Wixted, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
The Impact of the "Not Sure" Option on Lineup Identification Decisions
by: Kekessie, Seyram
Published: (2013) -
Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis
by: Curt A. Carlson, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Multiple Lineup Identification Procedure: Utility with Face-Only Lineups
by: Kalmet, Natalie
Published: (2009)