Informalizing Formal Logic

This paper presents a way in which formal logic can be understood and reformulated in terms of argumentation that can help us unify formal and informal reasoning. Classical deductive reasoning will be expressed entirely in terms of notions and concepts from argumentation so that formal logical enta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antonis Kakas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2019-06-01
Series:Informal Logic
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5169
id doaj-e38d79f7074642b9be813f7599c4c3c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e38d79f7074642b9be813f7599c4c3c32020-11-25T03:00:28ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2019-06-0139210.22329/il.v39i2.5169Informalizing Formal LogicAntonis Kakas0University of Cyprus This paper presents a way in which formal logic can be understood and reformulated in terms of argumentation that can help us unify formal and informal reasoning. Classical deductive reasoning will be expressed entirely in terms of notions and concepts from argumentation so that formal logical entailment is equivalently captured via the arguments that win between those supporting concluding formulae and arguments supporting contradictory formulae. This allows us to go beyond Classical Logic and smoothly connect it with human reasoning, thus providing a uniform argumentation-based view of both informal and formal logic. https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5169
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonis Kakas
spellingShingle Antonis Kakas
Informalizing Formal Logic
Informal Logic
author_facet Antonis Kakas
author_sort Antonis Kakas
title Informalizing Formal Logic
title_short Informalizing Formal Logic
title_full Informalizing Formal Logic
title_fullStr Informalizing Formal Logic
title_full_unstemmed Informalizing Formal Logic
title_sort informalizing formal logic
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2019-06-01
description This paper presents a way in which formal logic can be understood and reformulated in terms of argumentation that can help us unify formal and informal reasoning. Classical deductive reasoning will be expressed entirely in terms of notions and concepts from argumentation so that formal logical entailment is equivalently captured via the arguments that win between those supporting concluding formulae and arguments supporting contradictory formulae. This allows us to go beyond Classical Logic and smoothly connect it with human reasoning, thus providing a uniform argumentation-based view of both informal and formal logic.
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/5169
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniskakas informalizingformallogic
_version_ 1724697927247462400