Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas

Abstract Background On the background of the interventional radiology department of a tertiary hospital converting its periprocedural documentation from paper-based to electronic using a standardised proforma, a study was performed to ascertain the effects of this change on the standard of clinical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iakovos Theodoulou, Rhys Judd, U. Raja, N. Karunanithy, Tarun Sabharwal, Afshin Gangi, Athanasios Diamantopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-09-01
Series:CVIR Endovascular
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-020-00163-w
id doaj-e38809c6695148a3b95bcaa3df9d2b25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e38809c6695148a3b95bcaa3df9d2b252020-11-25T03:17:47ZengSpringerOpenCVIR Endovascular2520-89342020-09-01311610.1186/s42155-020-00163-wAudit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformasIakovos Theodoulou0Rhys Judd1U. Raja2N. Karunanithy3Tarun Sabharwal4Afshin Gangi5Athanasios Diamantopoulos6Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalNorth Shore Hospital, Waitemata DHBDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalAbstract Background On the background of the interventional radiology department of a tertiary hospital converting its periprocedural documentation from paper-based to electronic using a standardised proforma, a study was performed to ascertain the effects of this change on the standard of clinical documentation for radiologically-guided angiographic procedures. Using a retrospective approach, perioperative records were analysed in reverse chronological order for inclusion in the study. The standard for this audit was developed in the form of minimum criteria that all clinical documentation of angiographic procedures were expected to meet. Results The audit was performed at three equally spaced intervals of 6 months, yielding a total of 99 records. The baseline audit of paper-based records concluded > 80% completeness for 8 out of the 14 of parameters measured, with only two of parameters meeting the target of 100% completeness. The second audit cycle performed on electronic records found 7 out of 14 parameters demonstrating absolute improvement in completeness, when compared to paper-based, but with the number of parameters exceeding 80% completeness falling to only 4 out of 14. Again, 100% completeness was observed in only 2 of the parameters. In the final audit cycle, after the introduction of a standardised electronic proforma, performance improved in every dimension with 6 out of 14 parameters reaching completeness of 100% and the 80% completeness threshold met by 12 out of 14 parameters. Conclusion The construction of a procedure-specific perioperative electronic proforma can save clinicians valuable time and encourage safe and effective clinical documentation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-020-00163-w
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iakovos Theodoulou
Rhys Judd
U. Raja
N. Karunanithy
Tarun Sabharwal
Afshin Gangi
Athanasios Diamantopoulos
spellingShingle Iakovos Theodoulou
Rhys Judd
U. Raja
N. Karunanithy
Tarun Sabharwal
Afshin Gangi
Athanasios Diamantopoulos
Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
CVIR Endovascular
author_facet Iakovos Theodoulou
Rhys Judd
U. Raja
N. Karunanithy
Tarun Sabharwal
Afshin Gangi
Athanasios Diamantopoulos
author_sort Iakovos Theodoulou
title Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
title_short Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
title_full Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
title_fullStr Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
title_full_unstemmed Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
title_sort audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
publisher SpringerOpen
series CVIR Endovascular
issn 2520-8934
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Background On the background of the interventional radiology department of a tertiary hospital converting its periprocedural documentation from paper-based to electronic using a standardised proforma, a study was performed to ascertain the effects of this change on the standard of clinical documentation for radiologically-guided angiographic procedures. Using a retrospective approach, perioperative records were analysed in reverse chronological order for inclusion in the study. The standard for this audit was developed in the form of minimum criteria that all clinical documentation of angiographic procedures were expected to meet. Results The audit was performed at three equally spaced intervals of 6 months, yielding a total of 99 records. The baseline audit of paper-based records concluded > 80% completeness for 8 out of the 14 of parameters measured, with only two of parameters meeting the target of 100% completeness. The second audit cycle performed on electronic records found 7 out of 14 parameters demonstrating absolute improvement in completeness, when compared to paper-based, but with the number of parameters exceeding 80% completeness falling to only 4 out of 14. Again, 100% completeness was observed in only 2 of the parameters. In the final audit cycle, after the introduction of a standardised electronic proforma, performance improved in every dimension with 6 out of 14 parameters reaching completeness of 100% and the 80% completeness threshold met by 12 out of 14 parameters. Conclusion The construction of a procedure-specific perioperative electronic proforma can save clinicians valuable time and encourage safe and effective clinical documentation.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-020-00163-w
work_keys_str_mv AT iakovostheodoulou auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
AT rhysjudd auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
AT uraja auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
AT nkarunanithy auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
AT tarunsabharwal auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
AT afshingangi auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
AT athanasiosdiamantopoulos auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas
_version_ 1724630081233485824