Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas
Abstract Background On the background of the interventional radiology department of a tertiary hospital converting its periprocedural documentation from paper-based to electronic using a standardised proforma, a study was performed to ascertain the effects of this change on the standard of clinical...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-09-01
|
Series: | CVIR Endovascular |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-020-00163-w |
id |
doaj-e38809c6695148a3b95bcaa3df9d2b25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e38809c6695148a3b95bcaa3df9d2b252020-11-25T03:17:47ZengSpringerOpenCVIR Endovascular2520-89342020-09-01311610.1186/s42155-020-00163-wAudit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformasIakovos Theodoulou0Rhys Judd1U. Raja2N. Karunanithy3Tarun Sabharwal4Afshin Gangi5Athanasios Diamantopoulos6Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalNorth Shore Hospital, Waitemata DHBDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas’ HospitalAbstract Background On the background of the interventional radiology department of a tertiary hospital converting its periprocedural documentation from paper-based to electronic using a standardised proforma, a study was performed to ascertain the effects of this change on the standard of clinical documentation for radiologically-guided angiographic procedures. Using a retrospective approach, perioperative records were analysed in reverse chronological order for inclusion in the study. The standard for this audit was developed in the form of minimum criteria that all clinical documentation of angiographic procedures were expected to meet. Results The audit was performed at three equally spaced intervals of 6 months, yielding a total of 99 records. The baseline audit of paper-based records concluded > 80% completeness for 8 out of the 14 of parameters measured, with only two of parameters meeting the target of 100% completeness. The second audit cycle performed on electronic records found 7 out of 14 parameters demonstrating absolute improvement in completeness, when compared to paper-based, but with the number of parameters exceeding 80% completeness falling to only 4 out of 14. Again, 100% completeness was observed in only 2 of the parameters. In the final audit cycle, after the introduction of a standardised electronic proforma, performance improved in every dimension with 6 out of 14 parameters reaching completeness of 100% and the 80% completeness threshold met by 12 out of 14 parameters. Conclusion The construction of a procedure-specific perioperative electronic proforma can save clinicians valuable time and encourage safe and effective clinical documentation.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-020-00163-w |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Iakovos Theodoulou Rhys Judd U. Raja N. Karunanithy Tarun Sabharwal Afshin Gangi Athanasios Diamantopoulos |
spellingShingle |
Iakovos Theodoulou Rhys Judd U. Raja N. Karunanithy Tarun Sabharwal Afshin Gangi Athanasios Diamantopoulos Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas CVIR Endovascular |
author_facet |
Iakovos Theodoulou Rhys Judd U. Raja N. Karunanithy Tarun Sabharwal Afshin Gangi Athanasios Diamantopoulos |
author_sort |
Iakovos Theodoulou |
title |
Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas |
title_short |
Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas |
title_full |
Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas |
title_fullStr |
Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas |
title_sort |
audit of electronic operative documentation in interventional radiology: the value of standardised proformas |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
CVIR Endovascular |
issn |
2520-8934 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Background On the background of the interventional radiology department of a tertiary hospital converting its periprocedural documentation from paper-based to electronic using a standardised proforma, a study was performed to ascertain the effects of this change on the standard of clinical documentation for radiologically-guided angiographic procedures. Using a retrospective approach, perioperative records were analysed in reverse chronological order for inclusion in the study. The standard for this audit was developed in the form of minimum criteria that all clinical documentation of angiographic procedures were expected to meet. Results The audit was performed at three equally spaced intervals of 6 months, yielding a total of 99 records. The baseline audit of paper-based records concluded > 80% completeness for 8 out of the 14 of parameters measured, with only two of parameters meeting the target of 100% completeness. The second audit cycle performed on electronic records found 7 out of 14 parameters demonstrating absolute improvement in completeness, when compared to paper-based, but with the number of parameters exceeding 80% completeness falling to only 4 out of 14. Again, 100% completeness was observed in only 2 of the parameters. In the final audit cycle, after the introduction of a standardised electronic proforma, performance improved in every dimension with 6 out of 14 parameters reaching completeness of 100% and the 80% completeness threshold met by 12 out of 14 parameters. Conclusion The construction of a procedure-specific perioperative electronic proforma can save clinicians valuable time and encourage safe and effective clinical documentation. |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42155-020-00163-w |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT iakovostheodoulou auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas AT rhysjudd auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas AT uraja auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas AT nkarunanithy auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas AT tarunsabharwal auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas AT afshingangi auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas AT athanasiosdiamantopoulos auditofelectronicoperativedocumentationininterventionalradiologythevalueofstandardisedproformas |
_version_ |
1724630081233485824 |