Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Throughout most of the world, the primary response to the health and social impacts of illicit drug use has been to intensify the enforcement of drug laws. The consequences of this policy approach include an unprecedented growth in prison populations and increasi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kerr Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2006-08-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Online Access:http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/25
id doaj-e3866dbd9a0c45ce9ea532125f6bfeaf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3866dbd9a0c45ce9ea532125f6bfeaf2020-11-25T00:22:45ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172006-08-01312510.1186/1477-7517-3-25Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott OrtizKerr Thomas<p>Abstract</p> <p>Throughout most of the world, the primary response to the health and social impacts of illicit drug use has been to intensify the enforcement of drug laws. The consequences of this policy approach include an unprecedented growth in prison populations and increasing concerns regarding drug-related harms within prisons and without, including increased risk of HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) infection. This has led to calls from public health and prisoner advocacy groups to prison authorities to improve health services available in the community and those available to prisoners. While considerable progress has been made with respect to the growing implementation of HIV and HCV prevention measures within some nations' prisons, the case of Scott Ortiz illuminates a new set of challenges for prisoners and their advocates as judges often have a faulty understanding of public health arguments and data. In this case we see one such instance where a judge acts in ways not rooted in sound public health evidence or practice to produce a perverse outcome that violates both sound medical and judicial objectives.</p> http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/25
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kerr Thomas
spellingShingle Kerr Thomas
Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz
Harm Reduction Journal
author_facet Kerr Thomas
author_sort Kerr Thomas
title Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz
title_short Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz
title_full Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz
title_fullStr Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz
title_full_unstemmed Reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of Scott Ortiz
title_sort reconsidering the public health failings of the criminal justice system: a reflection on the case of scott ortiz
publisher BMC
series Harm Reduction Journal
issn 1477-7517
publishDate 2006-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Throughout most of the world, the primary response to the health and social impacts of illicit drug use has been to intensify the enforcement of drug laws. The consequences of this policy approach include an unprecedented growth in prison populations and increasing concerns regarding drug-related harms within prisons and without, including increased risk of HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) infection. This has led to calls from public health and prisoner advocacy groups to prison authorities to improve health services available in the community and those available to prisoners. While considerable progress has been made with respect to the growing implementation of HIV and HCV prevention measures within some nations' prisons, the case of Scott Ortiz illuminates a new set of challenges for prisoners and their advocates as judges often have a faulty understanding of public health arguments and data. In this case we see one such instance where a judge acts in ways not rooted in sound public health evidence or practice to produce a perverse outcome that violates both sound medical and judicial objectives.</p>
url http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/25
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrthomas reconsideringthepublichealthfailingsofthecriminaljusticesystemareflectiononthecaseofscottortiz
_version_ 1725358410750230528