On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science

The past 25 years have seen a rapid growth of knowledge about brain mechanisms involved in visual mental imagery. These advances have largely been made independently of the long history of philosophical – and even psychological – reckoning with imagery and its parent concept ‘imagination’. We sugges...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew eMacKisack, Susan eAldworth, Fiona eMacpherson, John eOnians, Crawford eWinlove, Adam eZeman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00515/full
id doaj-e3806f4a32714f14b2cf8d207cb472eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3806f4a32714f14b2cf8d207cb472eb2020-11-24T20:50:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-04-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00515181973On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery scienceMatthew eMacKisack0Susan eAldworth1Fiona eMacpherson2John eOnians3Crawford eWinlove4Adam eZeman5University of ExeterUniversity of YorkUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of East AngliaUniversity of ExeterUniversity of ExeterThe past 25 years have seen a rapid growth of knowledge about brain mechanisms involved in visual mental imagery. These advances have largely been made independently of the long history of philosophical – and even psychological – reckoning with imagery and its parent concept ‘imagination’. We suggest that the view from these empirical findings can be widened by an appreciation of imagination’s intellectual history, and we seek to show how that history both created the conditions for – and presents challenges to – the scientific endeavour. We focus on the neuroscientific literature’s most commonly used task - imagining a concrete object – and, after sketching what is known of the neurobiological mechanisms involved, we examine the same basic act of imagining from the perspective of several key positions in the history of philosophy and psychology. We present positions that, firstly, contextualise and inform the neuroscientific account, and secondly, pose conceptual and methodological challenges to the scientific analysis of imagery. We conclude by reflecting on the intellectual history of visualisation in the light of contemporary science, and the extent to which such science may resolve long-standing theoretical debates.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00515/fullImaginationfMRIPhilosophy of MindHistory of Psychologyvisual imageryHistory of Philosophy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew eMacKisack
Susan eAldworth
Fiona eMacpherson
John eOnians
Crawford eWinlove
Adam eZeman
spellingShingle Matthew eMacKisack
Susan eAldworth
Fiona eMacpherson
John eOnians
Crawford eWinlove
Adam eZeman
On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
Frontiers in Psychology
Imagination
fMRI
Philosophy of Mind
History of Psychology
visual imagery
History of Philosophy
author_facet Matthew eMacKisack
Susan eAldworth
Fiona eMacpherson
John eOnians
Crawford eWinlove
Adam eZeman
author_sort Matthew eMacKisack
title On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
title_short On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
title_full On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
title_fullStr On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
title_full_unstemmed On picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
title_sort on picturing a candle: the prehistory of imagery science
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2016-04-01
description The past 25 years have seen a rapid growth of knowledge about brain mechanisms involved in visual mental imagery. These advances have largely been made independently of the long history of philosophical – and even psychological – reckoning with imagery and its parent concept ‘imagination’. We suggest that the view from these empirical findings can be widened by an appreciation of imagination’s intellectual history, and we seek to show how that history both created the conditions for – and presents challenges to – the scientific endeavour. We focus on the neuroscientific literature’s most commonly used task - imagining a concrete object – and, after sketching what is known of the neurobiological mechanisms involved, we examine the same basic act of imagining from the perspective of several key positions in the history of philosophy and psychology. We present positions that, firstly, contextualise and inform the neuroscientific account, and secondly, pose conceptual and methodological challenges to the scientific analysis of imagery. We conclude by reflecting on the intellectual history of visualisation in the light of contemporary science, and the extent to which such science may resolve long-standing theoretical debates.
topic Imagination
fMRI
Philosophy of Mind
History of Psychology
visual imagery
History of Philosophy
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00515/full
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewemackisack onpicturingacandletheprehistoryofimageryscience
AT susanealdworth onpicturingacandletheprehistoryofimageryscience
AT fionaemacpherson onpicturingacandletheprehistoryofimageryscience
AT johneonians onpicturingacandletheprehistoryofimageryscience
AT crawfordewinlove onpicturingacandletheprehistoryofimageryscience
AT adamezeman onpicturingacandletheprehistoryofimageryscience
_version_ 1716804152352309248