Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities

This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eun-Young Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499/full
id doaj-e375c5c4343b4405bee8cbceab6d2a8a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e375c5c4343b4405bee8cbceab6d2a8a2021-04-14T04:29:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402021-04-011210.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499536499Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical DisabilitiesEun-Young ParkThis study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fit regarding factor structure, a one-factor model, four-factor model, and four-factor within bifactor model, as reported in previous studies, were examined using CFA, and goodness-of-fit indices were compared. As a result of the analysis, the four-factor model and the four-factor within bifactor model satisfied the criteria of correspondence with goodness-of-fit indices. Reliability of the four individual factors ranged from 0.722 to 0.834, indicating acceptable reliability. Validity and reliability of the four-factor within bifactor structure was confirmed through CFA and reliability analysis. In future studies using the CES-D-11 to measure depression in PWPD, comparison between four sub-factors and total scores might be possible.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499/fullfactor structureCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression scalepeople with physical disabilitiesvalidityreliability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eun-Young Park
spellingShingle Eun-Young Park
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
Frontiers in Psychiatry
factor structure
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale
people with physical disabilities
validity
reliability
author_facet Eun-Young Park
author_sort Eun-Young Park
title Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
title_short Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
title_full Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
title_fullStr Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
title_sort factor structure of the short-form of center for epidemiological studies depression scale for people with physical disabilities
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
issn 1664-0640
publishDate 2021-04-01
description This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fit regarding factor structure, a one-factor model, four-factor model, and four-factor within bifactor model, as reported in previous studies, were examined using CFA, and goodness-of-fit indices were compared. As a result of the analysis, the four-factor model and the four-factor within bifactor model satisfied the criteria of correspondence with goodness-of-fit indices. Reliability of the four individual factors ranged from 0.722 to 0.834, indicating acceptable reliability. Validity and reliability of the four-factor within bifactor structure was confirmed through CFA and reliability analysis. In future studies using the CES-D-11 to measure depression in PWPD, comparison between four sub-factors and total scores might be possible.
topic factor structure
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale
people with physical disabilities
validity
reliability
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499/full
work_keys_str_mv AT eunyoungpark factorstructureoftheshortformofcenterforepidemiologicalstudiesdepressionscaleforpeoplewithphysicaldisabilities
_version_ 1721527689698869248