Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities
This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499/full |
id |
doaj-e375c5c4343b4405bee8cbceab6d2a8a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e375c5c4343b4405bee8cbceab6d2a8a2021-04-14T04:29:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402021-04-011210.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499536499Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical DisabilitiesEun-Young ParkThis study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fit regarding factor structure, a one-factor model, four-factor model, and four-factor within bifactor model, as reported in previous studies, were examined using CFA, and goodness-of-fit indices were compared. As a result of the analysis, the four-factor model and the four-factor within bifactor model satisfied the criteria of correspondence with goodness-of-fit indices. Reliability of the four individual factors ranged from 0.722 to 0.834, indicating acceptable reliability. Validity and reliability of the four-factor within bifactor structure was confirmed through CFA and reliability analysis. In future studies using the CES-D-11 to measure depression in PWPD, comparison between four sub-factors and total scores might be possible.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499/fullfactor structureCenter for Epidemiological Studies Depression scalepeople with physical disabilitiesvalidityreliability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eun-Young Park |
spellingShingle |
Eun-Young Park Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities Frontiers in Psychiatry factor structure Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale people with physical disabilities validity reliability |
author_facet |
Eun-Young Park |
author_sort |
Eun-Young Park |
title |
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities |
title_short |
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities |
title_full |
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities |
title_fullStr |
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities |
title_sort |
factor structure of the short-form of center for epidemiological studies depression scale for people with physical disabilities |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychiatry |
issn |
1664-0640 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
This study aimed to examine the factor structure of the short-form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-11) using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We extracted data from 670 people with physical disabilities (PWPD) from the Korea Welfare Panel. To investigate the model fit regarding factor structure, a one-factor model, four-factor model, and four-factor within bifactor model, as reported in previous studies, were examined using CFA, and goodness-of-fit indices were compared. As a result of the analysis, the four-factor model and the four-factor within bifactor model satisfied the criteria of correspondence with goodness-of-fit indices. Reliability of the four individual factors ranged from 0.722 to 0.834, indicating acceptable reliability. Validity and reliability of the four-factor within bifactor structure was confirmed through CFA and reliability analysis. In future studies using the CES-D-11 to measure depression in PWPD, comparison between four sub-factors and total scores might be possible. |
topic |
factor structure Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale people with physical disabilities validity reliability |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eunyoungpark factorstructureoftheshortformofcenterforepidemiologicalstudiesdepressionscaleforpeoplewithphysicaldisabilities |
_version_ |
1721527689698869248 |