Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil

Abstract Background The docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin (DCF) regimen is an effective form of chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. However, the incidence of adverse events such as febrile neutropenia and hematological toxicity is high. Methods Among 937 patients with esophageal canc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Ohkura, Masaki Ueno, Harushi Udagawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-019-1665-x
id doaj-e360dbb788ed4131bce406e940dbfcd5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e360dbb788ed4131bce406e940dbfcd52020-11-25T03:07:20ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192019-07-011711610.1186/s12957-019-1665-xRisk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracilYu Ohkura0Masaki Ueno1Harushi Udagawa2Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital and Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical ResearchDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital and Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical ResearchDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital and Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical ResearchAbstract Background The docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin (DCF) regimen is an effective form of chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. However, the incidence of adverse events such as febrile neutropenia and hematological toxicity is high. Methods Among 937 patients with esophageal cancer at Toranomon Hospital between January 2011 and December 2018, 92 who underwent the DCF regimen as initial treatment were selected. We investigated the risk factors for febrile neutropenia in patients with esophageal cancer treated with DCF regimen and the effectiveness of pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis. Results Adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) were observed in 45 of the 92(48.9%) patients with esophageal cancer treated with an initial DCF regimen. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 20 (21.7%) patients. Non-use of pegfilgrastim (odds ratio = 16.393; 95% confidence interval 2.049–125.0) as primary prophylaxis was identified as an independent factor predictive of febrile neutropenia. The pegfilgrastim group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia than the control group (9.1% vs 61.0%; p < 0.001). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 3.0% in the pegfilgrastim group and 32.2% in the control group (p = 0.001). In addition, the incidence of any adverse effect ≥ CTCAE grade3 was also significantly lower in the pegfilgrastim group (12.1% vs 69.5%; p < 0.001). The reduced/interruption rate of next DCF therapy was 6.1% in the pegfilgrastim group and 30.5% in the control group (p = 0.006). Conclusion This study revealed that the non-use of pegfilgrastim was an independent factor predictive of febrile neutropenia in multivariate analysis. Pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis prevents severe neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the DCF regimen.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-019-1665-xPegfilgrastimEsophageal cancerDCF regimenFebrile neutropenia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu Ohkura
Masaki Ueno
Harushi Udagawa
spellingShingle Yu Ohkura
Masaki Ueno
Harushi Udagawa
Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Pegfilgrastim
Esophageal cancer
DCF regimen
Febrile neutropenia
author_facet Yu Ohkura
Masaki Ueno
Harushi Udagawa
author_sort Yu Ohkura
title Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
title_short Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
title_full Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
title_fullStr Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
title_sort risk factors for febrile neutropenia and effectiveness of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim in patients with esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 1477-7819
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Background The docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin (DCF) regimen is an effective form of chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. However, the incidence of adverse events such as febrile neutropenia and hematological toxicity is high. Methods Among 937 patients with esophageal cancer at Toranomon Hospital between January 2011 and December 2018, 92 who underwent the DCF regimen as initial treatment were selected. We investigated the risk factors for febrile neutropenia in patients with esophageal cancer treated with DCF regimen and the effectiveness of pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis. Results Adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) were observed in 45 of the 92(48.9%) patients with esophageal cancer treated with an initial DCF regimen. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 20 (21.7%) patients. Non-use of pegfilgrastim (odds ratio = 16.393; 95% confidence interval 2.049–125.0) as primary prophylaxis was identified as an independent factor predictive of febrile neutropenia. The pegfilgrastim group had a significantly lower incidence of neutropenia than the control group (9.1% vs 61.0%; p < 0.001). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 3.0% in the pegfilgrastim group and 32.2% in the control group (p = 0.001). In addition, the incidence of any adverse effect ≥ CTCAE grade3 was also significantly lower in the pegfilgrastim group (12.1% vs 69.5%; p < 0.001). The reduced/interruption rate of next DCF therapy was 6.1% in the pegfilgrastim group and 30.5% in the control group (p = 0.006). Conclusion This study revealed that the non-use of pegfilgrastim was an independent factor predictive of febrile neutropenia in multivariate analysis. Pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis prevents severe neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the DCF regimen.
topic Pegfilgrastim
Esophageal cancer
DCF regimen
Febrile neutropenia
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-019-1665-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yuohkura riskfactorsforfebrileneutropeniaandeffectivenessofprimaryprophylaxiswithpegfilgrastiminpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdocetaxelcisplatinand5fluorouracil
AT masakiueno riskfactorsforfebrileneutropeniaandeffectivenessofprimaryprophylaxiswithpegfilgrastiminpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdocetaxelcisplatinand5fluorouracil
AT harushiudagawa riskfactorsforfebrileneutropeniaandeffectivenessofprimaryprophylaxiswithpegfilgrastiminpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwithdocetaxelcisplatinand5fluorouracil
_version_ 1724671142459867136