In(ter)dependent lives

This article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because peo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen Christensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2009-07-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sjdr.se/articles/331
id doaj-e32e670042d14244b8c5ec5365e9a835
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e32e670042d14244b8c5ec5365e9a8352020-11-25T02:35:41ZengStockholm University PressScandinavian Journal of Disability Research1501-74191745-30112009-07-0111211713010.1080/15017410902830553260In(ter)dependent livesKaren Christensen0Department of Sociology, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayThis article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because people receive cash instead of care in order to employ their own care workers. Using a cross-national case study of cash-for-care for disabled people in the UK and Norway the present article points at two different social political interpretations of independence and suggests that neither of them lead to independence in terms of control and that assistance without care is impossible. A narrative analysis rather reveals that the cultural narrative about independence can be in disharmony with disabled people's personal narratives about limited control and care and that this should lead to a replacement of the idea of independence with the praxis of interdependence.https://www.sjdr.se/articles/331independenceinterdependencecash-for-caredisabled people
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen Christensen
spellingShingle Karen Christensen
In(ter)dependent lives
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
independence
interdependence
cash-for-care
disabled people
author_facet Karen Christensen
author_sort Karen Christensen
title In(ter)dependent lives
title_short In(ter)dependent lives
title_full In(ter)dependent lives
title_fullStr In(ter)dependent lives
title_full_unstemmed In(ter)dependent lives
title_sort in(ter)dependent lives
publisher Stockholm University Press
series Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
issn 1501-7419
1745-3011
publishDate 2009-07-01
description This article suggests it is important to confront independence, one of the key concepts of our time, with empirical analysis of how this is actually practised by individuals in their everyday life. Within social politics, the cash-for-care system is seen as a notable tool of independence because people receive cash instead of care in order to employ their own care workers. Using a cross-national case study of cash-for-care for disabled people in the UK and Norway the present article points at two different social political interpretations of independence and suggests that neither of them lead to independence in terms of control and that assistance without care is impossible. A narrative analysis rather reveals that the cultural narrative about independence can be in disharmony with disabled people's personal narratives about limited control and care and that this should lead to a replacement of the idea of independence with the praxis of interdependence.
topic independence
interdependence
cash-for-care
disabled people
url https://www.sjdr.se/articles/331
work_keys_str_mv AT karenchristensen interdependentlives
_version_ 1724804009925017600