Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study
Abstract Objectives Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is responsible for 15–25% cases of health-care-associated diarrhea. The CDI treatment algorithm used at our hospital is adapted from the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline. The primary objective of this study w...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00289-1 |
id |
doaj-e32dca817b8b4e129beb7e2f66cff926 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e32dca817b8b4e129beb7e2f66cff9262021-02-14T12:23:26ZengBMCJournal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice2052-32112021-02-0114111110.1186/s40545-020-00289-1Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective studyAli Elbeddini0Rachel Gerochi1Winchester District Memorial HospitalLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of TorontoAbstract Objectives Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is responsible for 15–25% cases of health-care-associated diarrhea. The CDI treatment algorithm used at our hospital is adapted from the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline. The primary objective of this study was to assess the treatment adherence to our algorithm; this was defined as therapy consisting of the appropriate antibiotic, dose, route, interval, and duration indicated based on the disease severity and episode within 24 h of diagnosis. Furthermore, our study also described the population and their risk factors for CDI at our hospital. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort chart review of CDI cases that were diagnosed at admission or during hospitalization from June 1st, 2017 to June 30th, 2018. Cases were identified by a positive stool test along with watery diarrhea or by colonoscopy. Results Sixty cases were included, of which adherence to our algorithm was 50%. Overall, severe CDI had the highest treatment non-adherence (83%), and the biggest contributing factor was prescribing the wrong antibiotic (72%). In severe CDI, which warrants vancomycin monotherapy, wrong antibiotic consisted of metronidazole monotherapy (55%) or dual therapy with metronidazole and vancomycin (45%). Patients were mostly older, females being treated for an initial episode of mild-to-moderate CDI. Common risk factors identified were age over 65 years (80%), use of antibiotics (83%) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (68%) within the previous 3 months. The use of a PPI in this study, a modifiable risk factor without a clear indication, was 35%. Conclusion An area for antimicrobial stewardship intervention in CDI treatment at our hospital is prescribing the right antibiotic based on the CDI indication. In severe CDI, an emphasis should be on prescribing vancomycin monotherapy as the drug of choice. PPI use should be reassessed for tapering when appropriate.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00289-1Clostridium difficile infectionMetronidazoleVancomycinAlgorithmAdherenceInfectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ali Elbeddini Rachel Gerochi |
spellingShingle |
Ali Elbeddini Rachel Gerochi Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Clostridium difficile infection Metronidazole Vancomycin Algorithm Adherence Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline |
author_facet |
Ali Elbeddini Rachel Gerochi |
author_sort |
Ali Elbeddini |
title |
Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study |
title_short |
Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study |
title_full |
Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr |
Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study |
title_sort |
treatment of clostridium difficile infection in community teaching hospital: a retrospective study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice |
issn |
2052-3211 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Objectives Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is responsible for 15–25% cases of health-care-associated diarrhea. The CDI treatment algorithm used at our hospital is adapted from the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline. The primary objective of this study was to assess the treatment adherence to our algorithm; this was defined as therapy consisting of the appropriate antibiotic, dose, route, interval, and duration indicated based on the disease severity and episode within 24 h of diagnosis. Furthermore, our study also described the population and their risk factors for CDI at our hospital. Methods This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort chart review of CDI cases that were diagnosed at admission or during hospitalization from June 1st, 2017 to June 30th, 2018. Cases were identified by a positive stool test along with watery diarrhea or by colonoscopy. Results Sixty cases were included, of which adherence to our algorithm was 50%. Overall, severe CDI had the highest treatment non-adherence (83%), and the biggest contributing factor was prescribing the wrong antibiotic (72%). In severe CDI, which warrants vancomycin monotherapy, wrong antibiotic consisted of metronidazole monotherapy (55%) or dual therapy with metronidazole and vancomycin (45%). Patients were mostly older, females being treated for an initial episode of mild-to-moderate CDI. Common risk factors identified were age over 65 years (80%), use of antibiotics (83%) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (68%) within the previous 3 months. The use of a PPI in this study, a modifiable risk factor without a clear indication, was 35%. Conclusion An area for antimicrobial stewardship intervention in CDI treatment at our hospital is prescribing the right antibiotic based on the CDI indication. In severe CDI, an emphasis should be on prescribing vancomycin monotherapy as the drug of choice. PPI use should be reassessed for tapering when appropriate. |
topic |
Clostridium difficile infection Metronidazole Vancomycin Algorithm Adherence Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010 C. difficile guideline |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40545-020-00289-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alielbeddini treatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectionincommunityteachinghospitalaretrospectivestudy AT rachelgerochi treatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectionincommunityteachinghospitalaretrospectivestudy |
_version_ |
1724270578741805056 |