Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus

Purpose: A proactive surgical and rehabilitation protocol was implemented to manage humeral fractures involving both the proximal end and shaft in an older patient population. Primary treatment goals were early return to function and reliable fracture union with minimal complications. Methods: From...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isaac B. James MS, Dana J. Farrell BS, Andrew R. Evans MD, Peter A. Siska MD, Ivan S. Tarkin MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-03-01
Series:Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458514520701
id doaj-e32913c324a543d094dd53df9d46bee8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e32913c324a543d094dd53df9d46bee82020-11-25T03:40:12ZengSAGE PublishingGeriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation2151-45852151-45932014-03-01510.1177/2151458514520701Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the HumerusIsaac B. James MSDana J. Farrell BSAndrew R. Evans MDPeter A. Siska MDIvan S. Tarkin MDPurpose: A proactive surgical and rehabilitation protocol was implemented to manage humeral fractures involving both the proximal end and shaft in an older patient population. Primary treatment goals were early return to function and reliable fracture union with minimal complications. Methods: From 2008 to 2012, 21 such operations were performed; 18 were considered “fragility” fractures based on mechanism, patient age, and evidence of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Open reduction and internal fixation ( ORIF ) was employed using direct reduction and fixation with a long periarticular locking plate. Physiotherapy was commenced 2 weeks postoperatively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to assess functional outcome at a time point greater than 1 year postoperative. Results: The study group consisted primarily of elderly females (83% with a median age of 69 years) whom sustained complex metadiaphyseal proximal humeral fractures after simple mechanical fall (78%). Uneventful union occurred in all cases. Local complications included 1 case of partial radial nerve palsy, which had resolved completely by 1 year. No cases of infection were identified. Long-term return to functionality was evident with a median DASH score of 12 (mean = 21, standard deviation = 20, n = 13). Seventy five percent of patients reported minimal or no pain (question [Q] 24), and 75% achieved return of overhead function (Q6, 12, and 15). Conclusion: Treatment of complex metadiaphyseal fragility fractures with anatomic reduction, fixed angle plating, and early physiotherapy returns the older patient to optimized functionality with minimal risk of complication. The DASH outcomes are equivalent to ORIF of isolated proximal humerus fractures and clinically indistinguishable from the general population.https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458514520701
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isaac B. James MS
Dana J. Farrell BS
Andrew R. Evans MD
Peter A. Siska MD
Ivan S. Tarkin MD
spellingShingle Isaac B. James MS
Dana J. Farrell BS
Andrew R. Evans MD
Peter A. Siska MD
Ivan S. Tarkin MD
Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
author_facet Isaac B. James MS
Dana J. Farrell BS
Andrew R. Evans MD
Peter A. Siska MD
Ivan S. Tarkin MD
author_sort Isaac B. James MS
title Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus
title_short Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus
title_full Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus
title_fullStr Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus
title_full_unstemmed Open Reconstruction of Complex Proximal Metadiaphyseal Fragility Fractures of the Humerus
title_sort open reconstruction of complex proximal metadiaphyseal fragility fractures of the humerus
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
issn 2151-4585
2151-4593
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Purpose: A proactive surgical and rehabilitation protocol was implemented to manage humeral fractures involving both the proximal end and shaft in an older patient population. Primary treatment goals were early return to function and reliable fracture union with minimal complications. Methods: From 2008 to 2012, 21 such operations were performed; 18 were considered “fragility” fractures based on mechanism, patient age, and evidence of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Open reduction and internal fixation ( ORIF ) was employed using direct reduction and fixation with a long periarticular locking plate. Physiotherapy was commenced 2 weeks postoperatively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to assess functional outcome at a time point greater than 1 year postoperative. Results: The study group consisted primarily of elderly females (83% with a median age of 69 years) whom sustained complex metadiaphyseal proximal humeral fractures after simple mechanical fall (78%). Uneventful union occurred in all cases. Local complications included 1 case of partial radial nerve palsy, which had resolved completely by 1 year. No cases of infection were identified. Long-term return to functionality was evident with a median DASH score of 12 (mean = 21, standard deviation = 20, n = 13). Seventy five percent of patients reported minimal or no pain (question [Q] 24), and 75% achieved return of overhead function (Q6, 12, and 15). Conclusion: Treatment of complex metadiaphyseal fragility fractures with anatomic reduction, fixed angle plating, and early physiotherapy returns the older patient to optimized functionality with minimal risk of complication. The DASH outcomes are equivalent to ORIF of isolated proximal humerus fractures and clinically indistinguishable from the general population.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458514520701
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacbjamesms openreconstructionofcomplexproximalmetadiaphysealfragilityfracturesofthehumerus
AT danajfarrellbs openreconstructionofcomplexproximalmetadiaphysealfragilityfracturesofthehumerus
AT andrewrevansmd openreconstructionofcomplexproximalmetadiaphysealfragilityfracturesofthehumerus
AT peterasiskamd openreconstructionofcomplexproximalmetadiaphysealfragilityfracturesofthehumerus
AT ivanstarkinmd openreconstructionofcomplexproximalmetadiaphysealfragilityfracturesofthehumerus
_version_ 1724535530679435264