Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP
In industrial process fault monitoring, it is very important to collect accurate data, but in the actual process, there are often various noises that are difficult to eliminate in the collected data due to sensor accuracy, measurement errors, or human factors. Existing statistical process monitoring...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Processes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/1/86 |
id |
doaj-e3133b2d066f4013ab54134e1eb1e433 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e3133b2d066f4013ab54134e1eb1e4332021-01-03T00:02:07ZengMDPI AGProcesses2227-97172021-01-019868610.3390/pr9010086Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPPFan Yang0Yuancun Cui1Feng Wu2Ridong Zhang3Information and Control Institute, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaZhejiang Jianye Chemical Co., Ltd., Jiande 311604, ChinaInformation and Control Institute, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaInformation and Control Institute, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, ChinaIn industrial process fault monitoring, it is very important to collect accurate data, but in the actual process, there are often various noises that are difficult to eliminate in the collected data due to sensor accuracy, measurement errors, or human factors. Existing statistical process monitoring methods often ignore the problem of data noise. To solve this problem, a sliding window wavelet denoising-global local preserving projections (SWWD-GLPP) process monitoring method is proposed. In the offline stage, the wavelet denoising method is used to denoise the offline data, and then, the GLPP method is used for offline modeling, and then, the control limit is obtained by the kernel density estimation method. In the online phase, the sliding window wavelet denoising method is used to denoise the online data in real time. Then, use the model of the GLPP method to find the statistics, compare them with the control limit, judge the fault situation, and finally, use the contribution graph method to determine the variable that caused the fault, so as to diagnose the fault. This article uses a numerical case to illustrate the effectiveness of the algorithm, using the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process to compare the traditional principal component analysis (PCA) and GLPP methods to further prove the effectiveness and superiority of the method.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/1/86process monitoringsliding windowwavelet denoisingglobal local preserving projectionsTennessee Eastmanprincipal component analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fan Yang Yuancun Cui Feng Wu Ridong Zhang |
spellingShingle |
Fan Yang Yuancun Cui Feng Wu Ridong Zhang Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP Processes process monitoring sliding window wavelet denoising global local preserving projections Tennessee Eastman principal component analysis |
author_facet |
Fan Yang Yuancun Cui Feng Wu Ridong Zhang |
author_sort |
Fan Yang |
title |
Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP |
title_short |
Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP |
title_full |
Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP |
title_fullStr |
Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fault Monitoring of Chemical Process Based on Sliding Window Wavelet DenoisingGLPP |
title_sort |
fault monitoring of chemical process based on sliding window wavelet denoisingglpp |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Processes |
issn |
2227-9717 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
In industrial process fault monitoring, it is very important to collect accurate data, but in the actual process, there are often various noises that are difficult to eliminate in the collected data due to sensor accuracy, measurement errors, or human factors. Existing statistical process monitoring methods often ignore the problem of data noise. To solve this problem, a sliding window wavelet denoising-global local preserving projections (SWWD-GLPP) process monitoring method is proposed. In the offline stage, the wavelet denoising method is used to denoise the offline data, and then, the GLPP method is used for offline modeling, and then, the control limit is obtained by the kernel density estimation method. In the online phase, the sliding window wavelet denoising method is used to denoise the online data in real time. Then, use the model of the GLPP method to find the statistics, compare them with the control limit, judge the fault situation, and finally, use the contribution graph method to determine the variable that caused the fault, so as to diagnose the fault. This article uses a numerical case to illustrate the effectiveness of the algorithm, using the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process to compare the traditional principal component analysis (PCA) and GLPP methods to further prove the effectiveness and superiority of the method. |
topic |
process monitoring sliding window wavelet denoising global local preserving projections Tennessee Eastman principal component analysis |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/1/86 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fanyang faultmonitoringofchemicalprocessbasedonslidingwindowwaveletdenoisingglpp AT yuancuncui faultmonitoringofchemicalprocessbasedonslidingwindowwaveletdenoisingglpp AT fengwu faultmonitoringofchemicalprocessbasedonslidingwindowwaveletdenoisingglpp AT ridongzhang faultmonitoringofchemicalprocessbasedonslidingwindowwaveletdenoisingglpp |
_version_ |
1724351302542032896 |