Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets

Background The development of expression-based gene signatures for predicting prognosis or class membership is a popular and challenging task. Besides their stringent validation, signatures need a functional interpretation and must be placed in a biological context. Popular tools such as Gene Set En...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuela Hummel, Klaus H. Metzeler, Christian Buske, Stefan K. Bohlander, Ulrich Mansmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S1018
id doaj-e2ec095f622e437c9bbf9fa3cf5fb86c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2ec095f622e437c9bbf9fa3cf5fb86c2020-11-25T03:43:38ZengSAGE PublishingBioinformatics and Biology Insights1177-93222008-01-01210.4137/BBI.S1018Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene SetsManuela Hummel0Klaus H. Metzeler1Christian Buske2Stefan K. Bohlander3Ulrich Mansmann4Bioinformatics and Genomics Program, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona, Spain.Laboratory of Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Großhadern, University of Munich, Germany.Laboratory of Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Großhadern, University of Munich, Germany.Laboratory of Leukemia Diagnostics, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Großhadern, University of Munich, Germany.Department of Statistics, University of Munich, Germany.Background The development of expression-based gene signatures for predicting prognosis or class membership is a popular and challenging task. Besides their stringent validation, signatures need a functional interpretation and must be placed in a biological context. Popular tools such as Gene Set Enrichment have drawbacks because they are restricted to annotated genes and are unable to capture the information hidden in the signature's non-annotated genes. Methodology We propose concepts to relate a signature with functional gene sets like pathways or Gene Ontology categories. The connection between single signature genes and a specific pathway is explored by hierarchical variable selection and gene association networks. The risk score derived from an individual patient's signature is related to expression patterns of pathways and Gene Ontology categories. Global tests are useful for these tasks, and they adjust for other factors. GlobalAncova is used to explore the effect on gene expression in specific functional groups from the interaction of the score and selected mutations in the patient's genome. Results We apply the proposed methods to an expression data set and a corresponding gene signature for predicting survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). The example demonstrates strong relations between the signature and cancer-related pathways. The signature-based risk score was found to be associated with development-related biological processes. Conclusions Many authors interpret the functional aspects of a gene signature by linking signature genes to pathways or relevant functional gene groups. The method of gene set enrichment is preferred to annotating signature genes to specific Gene Ontology categories. The strategies proposed in this paper go beyond the restriction of annotation and deepen the insights into the biological mechanisms reflected in the information given by a signature.https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S1018
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuela Hummel
Klaus H. Metzeler
Christian Buske
Stefan K. Bohlander
Ulrich Mansmann
spellingShingle Manuela Hummel
Klaus H. Metzeler
Christian Buske
Stefan K. Bohlander
Ulrich Mansmann
Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets
Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
author_facet Manuela Hummel
Klaus H. Metzeler
Christian Buske
Stefan K. Bohlander
Ulrich Mansmann
author_sort Manuela Hummel
title Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets
title_short Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets
title_full Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets
title_fullStr Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets
title_full_unstemmed Association between a Prognostic Gene Signature and Functional Gene Sets
title_sort association between a prognostic gene signature and functional gene sets
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
issn 1177-9322
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Background The development of expression-based gene signatures for predicting prognosis or class membership is a popular and challenging task. Besides their stringent validation, signatures need a functional interpretation and must be placed in a biological context. Popular tools such as Gene Set Enrichment have drawbacks because they are restricted to annotated genes and are unable to capture the information hidden in the signature's non-annotated genes. Methodology We propose concepts to relate a signature with functional gene sets like pathways or Gene Ontology categories. The connection between single signature genes and a specific pathway is explored by hierarchical variable selection and gene association networks. The risk score derived from an individual patient's signature is related to expression patterns of pathways and Gene Ontology categories. Global tests are useful for these tasks, and they adjust for other factors. GlobalAncova is used to explore the effect on gene expression in specific functional groups from the interaction of the score and selected mutations in the patient's genome. Results We apply the proposed methods to an expression data set and a corresponding gene signature for predicting survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). The example demonstrates strong relations between the signature and cancer-related pathways. The signature-based risk score was found to be associated with development-related biological processes. Conclusions Many authors interpret the functional aspects of a gene signature by linking signature genes to pathways or relevant functional gene groups. The method of gene set enrichment is preferred to annotating signature genes to specific Gene Ontology categories. The strategies proposed in this paper go beyond the restriction of annotation and deepen the insights into the biological mechanisms reflected in the information given by a signature.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S1018
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelahummel associationbetweenaprognosticgenesignatureandfunctionalgenesets
AT klaushmetzeler associationbetweenaprognosticgenesignatureandfunctionalgenesets
AT christianbuske associationbetweenaprognosticgenesignatureandfunctionalgenesets
AT stefankbohlander associationbetweenaprognosticgenesignatureandfunctionalgenesets
AT ulrichmansmann associationbetweenaprognosticgenesignatureandfunctionalgenesets
_version_ 1724518581592391680