Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Earlier functional imaging studies on visually induced self-motion perception (vection) disclosed a bilateral network of activations within primary and secondary visual cortex areas which was combined with signal decreases, i.e., dea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Becker-Bense Sandra, Buchholz Hans-Georg, zu Eulenburg Peter, Best Christoph, Bartenstein Peter, Schreckenberger Matthias, Dieterich Marianne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-07-01
Series:BMC Neuroscience
Subjects:
PET
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/81
id doaj-e2d3b7a441ce4388a2e77c0b89177df4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2d3b7a441ce4388a2e77c0b89177df42020-11-24T22:01:03ZengBMCBMC Neuroscience1471-22022012-07-011318110.1186/1471-2202-13-81Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)Becker-Bense SandraBuchholz Hans-Georgzu Eulenburg PeterBest ChristophBartenstein PeterSchreckenberger MatthiasDieterich Marianne<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Earlier functional imaging studies on visually induced self-motion perception (vection) disclosed a bilateral network of activations within primary and secondary visual cortex areas which was combined with signal decreases, i.e., deactivations, in multisensory vestibular cortex areas. This finding led to the concept of a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the visual and vestibular systems. In order to define areas involved in special aspects of self-motion perception such as intensity and duration of the perceived circular vection (CV) or the amount of head tilt, correlation analyses of the regional cerebral glucose metabolism, rCGM (measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography, FDG-PET) and these perceptual covariates were performed in 14 healthy volunteers. For analyses of the visual-vestibular interaction, the CV data were compared to a random dot motion stimulation condition (not inducing vection) and a control group at rest (no stimulation at all).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Group subtraction analyses showed that the visual-vestibular interaction was modified during CV, i.e., the activations within the cerebellar vermis and parieto-occipital areas were enhanced. The correlation analysis between the rCGM and the intensity of visually induced vection, experienced as body tilt, showed a relationship for areas of the multisensory vestibular cortical network (inferior parietal lobule bilaterally, anterior cingulate gyrus), the medial parieto-occipital cortex, the frontal eye fields and the cerebellar vermis. The “earlier” multisensory vestibular areas like the parieto-insular vestibular cortex and the superior temporal gyrus did not appear in the latter analysis. The duration of perceived vection after stimulus stop was positively correlated with rCGM in medial temporal lobe areas bilaterally, which included the (para-)hippocampus, known to be involved in various aspects of memory processing. The amount of head tilt was found to be positively correlated with the rCGM of bilateral basal ganglia regions responsible for the control of motor function of the head.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our data gave further insights into subfunctions within the complex cortical network involved in the processing of visual-vestibular interaction during CV. Specific areas of this cortical network could be attributed to the ventral stream (“what” pathway) responsible for the duration after stimulus stop and to the dorsal stream (“where/how” pathway) responsible for intensity aspects.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/81Self-motion perceptionCircular vectionVisual pathwaysVentral and dorsal streamVisual-vestibular interactionPETHumans
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Becker-Bense Sandra
Buchholz Hans-Georg
zu Eulenburg Peter
Best Christoph
Bartenstein Peter
Schreckenberger Matthias
Dieterich Marianne
spellingShingle Becker-Bense Sandra
Buchholz Hans-Georg
zu Eulenburg Peter
Best Christoph
Bartenstein Peter
Schreckenberger Matthias
Dieterich Marianne
Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
BMC Neuroscience
Self-motion perception
Circular vection
Visual pathways
Ventral and dorsal stream
Visual-vestibular interaction
PET
Humans
author_facet Becker-Bense Sandra
Buchholz Hans-Georg
zu Eulenburg Peter
Best Christoph
Bartenstein Peter
Schreckenberger Matthias
Dieterich Marianne
author_sort Becker-Bense Sandra
title Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_short Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_full Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_fullStr Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_full_unstemmed Ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (FDG-PET study)
title_sort ventral and dorsal streams processing visual motion perception (fdg-pet study)
publisher BMC
series BMC Neuroscience
issn 1471-2202
publishDate 2012-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Earlier functional imaging studies on visually induced self-motion perception (vection) disclosed a bilateral network of activations within primary and secondary visual cortex areas which was combined with signal decreases, i.e., deactivations, in multisensory vestibular cortex areas. This finding led to the concept of a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the visual and vestibular systems. In order to define areas involved in special aspects of self-motion perception such as intensity and duration of the perceived circular vection (CV) or the amount of head tilt, correlation analyses of the regional cerebral glucose metabolism, rCGM (measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography, FDG-PET) and these perceptual covariates were performed in 14 healthy volunteers. For analyses of the visual-vestibular interaction, the CV data were compared to a random dot motion stimulation condition (not inducing vection) and a control group at rest (no stimulation at all).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Group subtraction analyses showed that the visual-vestibular interaction was modified during CV, i.e., the activations within the cerebellar vermis and parieto-occipital areas were enhanced. The correlation analysis between the rCGM and the intensity of visually induced vection, experienced as body tilt, showed a relationship for areas of the multisensory vestibular cortical network (inferior parietal lobule bilaterally, anterior cingulate gyrus), the medial parieto-occipital cortex, the frontal eye fields and the cerebellar vermis. The “earlier” multisensory vestibular areas like the parieto-insular vestibular cortex and the superior temporal gyrus did not appear in the latter analysis. The duration of perceived vection after stimulus stop was positively correlated with rCGM in medial temporal lobe areas bilaterally, which included the (para-)hippocampus, known to be involved in various aspects of memory processing. The amount of head tilt was found to be positively correlated with the rCGM of bilateral basal ganglia regions responsible for the control of motor function of the head.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our data gave further insights into subfunctions within the complex cortical network involved in the processing of visual-vestibular interaction during CV. Specific areas of this cortical network could be attributed to the ventral stream (“what” pathway) responsible for the duration after stimulus stop and to the dorsal stream (“where/how” pathway) responsible for intensity aspects.</p>
topic Self-motion perception
Circular vection
Visual pathways
Ventral and dorsal stream
Visual-vestibular interaction
PET
Humans
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/81
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerbensesandra ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT buchholzhansgeorg ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT zueulenburgpeter ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT bestchristoph ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT bartensteinpeter ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT schreckenbergermatthias ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
AT dieterichmarianne ventralanddorsalstreamsprocessingvisualmotionperceptionfdgpetstudy
_version_ 1725841942703505408