Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy

In this study, we aim to gain critical insights into how cooperative professional development affects teachers’ efficacy. To this end, the purpose of this study is to identify cooperative professional development types (CPD-type) and to reveal the relationship between CPD-type and teachers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaewoo Choi, Woonsun Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/585
id doaj-e2c6c3d32f4048789110b3656c888027
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2c6c3d32f4048789110b3656c8880272020-11-24T22:18:45ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-01-0111358510.3390/su11030585su11030585Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ EfficacyJaewoo Choi0Woonsun Kang1Department of Textile Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Sangju-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 37224, KoreaDepartment of Social Studies Education, Daegu University, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 38453, KoreaIn this study, we aim to gain critical insights into how cooperative professional development affects teachers’ efficacy. To this end, the purpose of this study is to identify cooperative professional development types (CPD-type) and to reveal the relationship between CPD-type and teachers’ efficacy in Korean middle schools, controlling for gender, age, years of experience and school climate. The data of this study are derived from the 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) conducted by the OECD. The K-mean cluster analysis was used to identify distinct clusters of middle school teachers based on CPD. This process identified four specific groups: the disengaged group (36.8%), the collaborative group (11.3%), the activity-focused group (24.8%), and the coordinative group (27.1%). Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that all dummy variables of CPD-type were statistically significant, controlling for gender, age, years of experience, and school climate. Comparing the relative importance of each variable on teachers’ efficacy, the CPD1 (1 = the collaborative group) variable was most important. The results of this study provide a rationale for teachers to participate in collaborative professional development actively.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/585sustainability education (SE)sustainability of professional developmentteachers’ efficacythe collaborative groupthe disengaged groupthe activity-focused group
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaewoo Choi
Woonsun Kang
spellingShingle Jaewoo Choi
Woonsun Kang
Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy
Sustainability
sustainability education (SE)
sustainability of professional development
teachers’ efficacy
the collaborative group
the disengaged group
the activity-focused group
author_facet Jaewoo Choi
Woonsun Kang
author_sort Jaewoo Choi
title Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy
title_short Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy
title_full Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy
title_fullStr Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy
title_sort sustainability of cooperative professional development: focused on teachers’ efficacy
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this study, we aim to gain critical insights into how cooperative professional development affects teachers’ efficacy. To this end, the purpose of this study is to identify cooperative professional development types (CPD-type) and to reveal the relationship between CPD-type and teachers’ efficacy in Korean middle schools, controlling for gender, age, years of experience and school climate. The data of this study are derived from the 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) conducted by the OECD. The K-mean cluster analysis was used to identify distinct clusters of middle school teachers based on CPD. This process identified four specific groups: the disengaged group (36.8%), the collaborative group (11.3%), the activity-focused group (24.8%), and the coordinative group (27.1%). Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that all dummy variables of CPD-type were statistically significant, controlling for gender, age, years of experience, and school climate. Comparing the relative importance of each variable on teachers’ efficacy, the CPD1 (1 = the collaborative group) variable was most important. The results of this study provide a rationale for teachers to participate in collaborative professional development actively.
topic sustainability education (SE)
sustainability of professional development
teachers’ efficacy
the collaborative group
the disengaged group
the activity-focused group
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/585
work_keys_str_mv AT jaewoochoi sustainabilityofcooperativeprofessionaldevelopmentfocusedonteachersefficacy
AT woonsunkang sustainabilityofcooperativeprofessionaldevelopmentfocusedonteachersefficacy
_version_ 1725781803862589440