Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.

BACKGROUND: Vision provides the most salient information with regard to the stimulus motion. However, it has recently been demonstrated that static visual stimuli are perceived as moving laterally by alternating left-right sound sources. The underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear; i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Souta Hidaka, Wataru Teramoto, Yoichi Sugita, Yuko Manaka, Shuichi Sakamoto, Yôiti Suzuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3052321?pdf=render
id doaj-e2a6134d07d54d5fa9c5cbfc513786ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2a6134d07d54d5fa9c5cbfc513786ca2020-11-25T01:25:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0163e1749910.1371/journal.pone.0017499Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.Souta HidakaWataru TeramotoYoichi SugitaYuko ManakaShuichi SakamotoYôiti SuzukiBACKGROUND: Vision provides the most salient information with regard to the stimulus motion. However, it has recently been demonstrated that static visual stimuli are perceived as moving laterally by alternating left-right sound sources. The underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear; it has not yet been determined whether auditory motion signals, rather than auditory positional signals, can directly contribute to visual motion perception. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Static visual flashes were presented at retinal locations outside the fovea together with a lateral auditory motion provided by a virtual stereo noise source smoothly shifting in the horizontal plane. The flash appeared to move by means of the auditory motion when the spatiotemporal position of the flashes was in the middle of the auditory motion trajectory. Furthermore, the lateral auditory motion altered visual motion perception in a global motion display where different localized motion signals of multiple visual stimuli were combined to produce a coherent visual motion perception. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest there exist direct interactions between auditory and visual motion signals, and that there might be common neural substrates for auditory and visual motion processing.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3052321?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Souta Hidaka
Wataru Teramoto
Yoichi Sugita
Yuko Manaka
Shuichi Sakamoto
Yôiti Suzuki
spellingShingle Souta Hidaka
Wataru Teramoto
Yoichi Sugita
Yuko Manaka
Shuichi Sakamoto
Yôiti Suzuki
Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Souta Hidaka
Wataru Teramoto
Yoichi Sugita
Yuko Manaka
Shuichi Sakamoto
Yôiti Suzuki
author_sort Souta Hidaka
title Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
title_short Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
title_full Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
title_fullStr Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
title_full_unstemmed Auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
title_sort auditory motion information drives visual motion perception.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Vision provides the most salient information with regard to the stimulus motion. However, it has recently been demonstrated that static visual stimuli are perceived as moving laterally by alternating left-right sound sources. The underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear; it has not yet been determined whether auditory motion signals, rather than auditory positional signals, can directly contribute to visual motion perception. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Static visual flashes were presented at retinal locations outside the fovea together with a lateral auditory motion provided by a virtual stereo noise source smoothly shifting in the horizontal plane. The flash appeared to move by means of the auditory motion when the spatiotemporal position of the flashes was in the middle of the auditory motion trajectory. Furthermore, the lateral auditory motion altered visual motion perception in a global motion display where different localized motion signals of multiple visual stimuli were combined to produce a coherent visual motion perception. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest there exist direct interactions between auditory and visual motion signals, and that there might be common neural substrates for auditory and visual motion processing.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3052321?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT soutahidaka auditorymotioninformationdrivesvisualmotionperception
AT wataruteramoto auditorymotioninformationdrivesvisualmotionperception
AT yoichisugita auditorymotioninformationdrivesvisualmotionperception
AT yukomanaka auditorymotioninformationdrivesvisualmotionperception
AT shuichisakamoto auditorymotioninformationdrivesvisualmotionperception
AT yoitisuzuki auditorymotioninformationdrivesvisualmotionperception
_version_ 1725113803298832384