A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology

The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajab Esfandiari, Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, 2016-03-01
Series:Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_868_f68101271baae58a40eca6835544f3fc.pdf
id doaj-e290d89dd7c6436c898104de4a92121f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e290d89dd7c6436c898104de4a92121f2020-11-25T01:52:44ZengImam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 2676-53572676-53572016-03-0131301868A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and TechnologyRajab Esfandiari0Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein1Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, QazvinMA in ELT, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin branchThe purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (RAs) across 38 Food Science and Technology (FST) journals. Setting frequency and range as two criteria, we used AntConc to identify the most frequent lexical bundles. We also used Hyland’s (2008b) functional taxonomy to analyse the functions of the lexical bundles. The results of frequency and range showed 153 lexical bundles in FST Corpus. Functional analysis of the lexical bundles revealed 86 text-oriented, 63 research-oriented, and four participant-oriented lexical bundles, suggesting the central role text-oriented functions may play in FST. Implications for the explicit instruction of lexical bundles, for graduate students in FST, and for EAP curriculum developers and materials producers are discussed.   <strong> </strong>http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_868_f68101271baae58a40eca6835544f3fc.pdfLexical bundlescorpusFood Science and Technologyrange
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajab Esfandiari
Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein
spellingShingle Rajab Esfandiari
Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein
A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
Lexical bundles
corpus
Food Science and Technology
range
author_facet Rajab Esfandiari
Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein
author_sort Rajab Esfandiari
title A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
title_short A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
title_full A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
title_fullStr A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
title_full_unstemmed A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
title_sort corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in food science and technology
publisher Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,
series Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies
issn 2676-5357
2676-5357
publishDate 2016-03-01
description The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (RAs) across 38 Food Science and Technology (FST) journals. Setting frequency and range as two criteria, we used AntConc to identify the most frequent lexical bundles. We also used Hyland’s (2008b) functional taxonomy to analyse the functions of the lexical bundles. The results of frequency and range showed 153 lexical bundles in FST Corpus. Functional analysis of the lexical bundles revealed 86 text-oriented, 63 research-oriented, and four participant-oriented lexical bundles, suggesting the central role text-oriented functions may play in FST. Implications for the explicit instruction of lexical bundles, for graduate students in FST, and for EAP curriculum developers and materials producers are discussed.   <strong> </strong>
topic Lexical bundles
corpus
Food Science and Technology
range
url http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_868_f68101271baae58a40eca6835544f3fc.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rajabesfandiari acorpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology
AT ghodsiehtavakolimoein acorpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology
AT rajabesfandiari corpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology
AT ghodsiehtavakolimoein corpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology
_version_ 1724993411409248256