A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology
The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (R...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin,
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_868_f68101271baae58a40eca6835544f3fc.pdf |
id |
doaj-e290d89dd7c6436c898104de4a92121f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e290d89dd7c6436c898104de4a92121f2020-11-25T01:52:44ZengImam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies 2676-53572676-53572016-03-0131301868A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and TechnologyRajab Esfandiari0Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein1Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, QazvinMA in ELT, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin branchThe purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (RAs) across 38 Food Science and Technology (FST) journals. Setting frequency and range as two criteria, we used AntConc to identify the most frequent lexical bundles. We also used Hyland’s (2008b) functional taxonomy to analyse the functions of the lexical bundles. The results of frequency and range showed 153 lexical bundles in FST Corpus. Functional analysis of the lexical bundles revealed 86 text-oriented, 63 research-oriented, and four participant-oriented lexical bundles, suggesting the central role text-oriented functions may play in FST. Implications for the explicit instruction of lexical bundles, for graduate students in FST, and for EAP curriculum developers and materials producers are discussed. <strong> </strong>http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_868_f68101271baae58a40eca6835544f3fc.pdfLexical bundlescorpusFood Science and Technologyrange |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rajab Esfandiari Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein |
spellingShingle |
Rajab Esfandiari Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies Lexical bundles corpus Food Science and Technology range |
author_facet |
Rajab Esfandiari Ghodsieh Tavakoli Moein |
author_sort |
Rajab Esfandiari |
title |
A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology |
title_short |
A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology |
title_full |
A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology |
title_fullStr |
A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology |
title_full_unstemmed |
A corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in Food Science and Technology |
title_sort |
corpus-driven investigation into lexical bundles across research articles in food science and technology |
publisher |
Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, |
series |
Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies |
issn |
2676-5357 2676-5357 |
publishDate |
2016-03-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to identify the most frequent 4-word lexical bundles and (b) to analyse the functions these lexical bundles may serve. To those ends, a corpus of 4,652,444 in Food Science and Technology (hereafter FST Corpus) was developed, using 1,421 research articles (RAs) across 38 Food Science and Technology (FST) journals. Setting frequency and range as two criteria, we used AntConc to identify the most frequent lexical bundles. We also used Hyland’s (2008b) functional taxonomy to analyse the functions of the lexical bundles. The results of frequency and range showed 153 lexical bundles in FST Corpus. Functional analysis of the lexical bundles revealed 86 text-oriented, 63 research-oriented, and four participant-oriented lexical bundles, suggesting the central role text-oriented functions may play in FST. Implications for the explicit instruction of lexical bundles, for graduate students in FST, and for EAP curriculum developers and materials producers are discussed.
<strong> </strong> |
topic |
Lexical bundles corpus Food Science and Technology range |
url |
http://jmrels.journals.ikiu.ac.ir/article_868_f68101271baae58a40eca6835544f3fc.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rajabesfandiari acorpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology AT ghodsiehtavakolimoein acorpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology AT rajabesfandiari corpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology AT ghodsiehtavakolimoein corpusdriveninvestigationintolexicalbundlesacrossresearcharticlesinfoodscienceandtechnology |
_version_ |
1724993411409248256 |