Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
The problem of anti-terrorism security checks of express transportation becomes more and more severe under the Internet shopping model. In this paper, a Stackelberg game model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks is built to discuss, in terms of single and...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2021-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/29/e3sconf_eem2021_02020.pdf |
id |
doaj-e28a36e6b9f744f1b9a38bb3c4e6fd06 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e28a36e6b9f744f1b9a38bb3c4e6fd062021-05-28T12:35:18ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-012530202010.1051/e3sconf/202125302020e3sconf_eem2021_02020Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security ChecksBu Bing0Wang Lei1Pi Zhenyang2Fang Weiguo3School of Economics and Management, Beihang UniversityDepartment of Public Order, Criminal Investigation Police University of ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Beihang UniversitySchool of Economics and Management, Beihang UniversityThe problem of anti-terrorism security checks of express transportation becomes more and more severe under the Internet shopping model. In this paper, a Stackelberg game model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks is built to discuss, in terms of single and multiple routes, the optimal resource allocation of express company (defender) including physical security measures, in-box sensor technology, non-intrusive security measures at terminal distribution sites and handover course. It shows that, for the single route, express company should trade off the security costs among the first, second and third level security measures, and should allocate the same security costs of physical security measures for every distribution site. For the multiple routes, the transportation route that terrorists insert the hazardous materials has the lowest probability of physical security measures, and therefore is utilized by terrorists. Thus, the optimal allocation plan of security resources should be the same security costs of non-intrusive security measures at the final distribution sites (the third level security measure) among each transportation routes.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/29/e3sconf_eem2021_02020.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bu Bing Wang Lei Pi Zhenyang Fang Weiguo |
spellingShingle |
Bu Bing Wang Lei Pi Zhenyang Fang Weiguo Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks E3S Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Bu Bing Wang Lei Pi Zhenyang Fang Weiguo |
author_sort |
Bu Bing |
title |
Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks |
title_short |
Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks |
title_full |
Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks |
title_fullStr |
Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks |
title_sort |
stackelberg model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
E3S Web of Conferences |
issn |
2267-1242 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
The problem of anti-terrorism security checks of express transportation becomes more and more severe under the Internet shopping model. In this paper, a Stackelberg game model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks is built to discuss, in terms of single and multiple routes, the optimal resource allocation of express company (defender) including physical security measures, in-box sensor technology, non-intrusive security measures at terminal distribution sites and handover course. It shows that, for the single route, express company should trade off the security costs among the first, second and third level security measures, and should allocate the same security costs of physical security measures for every distribution site. For the multiple routes, the transportation route that terrorists insert the hazardous materials has the lowest probability of physical security measures, and therefore is utilized by terrorists. Thus, the optimal allocation plan of security resources should be the same security costs of non-intrusive security measures at the final distribution sites (the third level security measure) among each transportation routes. |
url |
https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/29/e3sconf_eem2021_02020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bubing stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks AT wanglei stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks AT pizhenyang stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks AT fangweiguo stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks |
_version_ |
1721424149693333504 |