Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks

The problem of anti-terrorism security checks of express transportation becomes more and more severe under the Internet shopping model. In this paper, a Stackelberg game model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks is built to discuss, in terms of single and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bu Bing, Wang Lei, Pi Zhenyang, Fang Weiguo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/29/e3sconf_eem2021_02020.pdf
id doaj-e28a36e6b9f744f1b9a38bb3c4e6fd06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e28a36e6b9f744f1b9a38bb3c4e6fd062021-05-28T12:35:18ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-012530202010.1051/e3sconf/202125302020e3sconf_eem2021_02020Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security ChecksBu Bing0Wang Lei1Pi Zhenyang2Fang Weiguo3School of Economics and Management, Beihang UniversityDepartment of Public Order, Criminal Investigation Police University of ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, Beihang UniversitySchool of Economics and Management, Beihang UniversityThe problem of anti-terrorism security checks of express transportation becomes more and more severe under the Internet shopping model. In this paper, a Stackelberg game model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks is built to discuss, in terms of single and multiple routes, the optimal resource allocation of express company (defender) including physical security measures, in-box sensor technology, non-intrusive security measures at terminal distribution sites and handover course. It shows that, for the single route, express company should trade off the security costs among the first, second and third level security measures, and should allocate the same security costs of physical security measures for every distribution site. For the multiple routes, the transportation route that terrorists insert the hazardous materials has the lowest probability of physical security measures, and therefore is utilized by terrorists. Thus, the optimal allocation plan of security resources should be the same security costs of non-intrusive security measures at the final distribution sites (the third level security measure) among each transportation routes.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/29/e3sconf_eem2021_02020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bu Bing
Wang Lei
Pi Zhenyang
Fang Weiguo
spellingShingle Bu Bing
Wang Lei
Pi Zhenyang
Fang Weiguo
Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Bu Bing
Wang Lei
Pi Zhenyang
Fang Weiguo
author_sort Bu Bing
title Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
title_short Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
title_full Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
title_fullStr Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
title_full_unstemmed Stackelberg Model of Anti-terrorism Resource Allocation in Express Transportation Security Checks
title_sort stackelberg model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The problem of anti-terrorism security checks of express transportation becomes more and more severe under the Internet shopping model. In this paper, a Stackelberg game model of anti-terrorism resource allocation in express transportation security checks is built to discuss, in terms of single and multiple routes, the optimal resource allocation of express company (defender) including physical security measures, in-box sensor technology, non-intrusive security measures at terminal distribution sites and handover course. It shows that, for the single route, express company should trade off the security costs among the first, second and third level security measures, and should allocate the same security costs of physical security measures for every distribution site. For the multiple routes, the transportation route that terrorists insert the hazardous materials has the lowest probability of physical security measures, and therefore is utilized by terrorists. Thus, the optimal allocation plan of security resources should be the same security costs of non-intrusive security measures at the final distribution sites (the third level security measure) among each transportation routes.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/29/e3sconf_eem2021_02020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bubing stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks
AT wanglei stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks
AT pizhenyang stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks
AT fangweiguo stackelbergmodelofantiterrorismresourceallocationinexpresstransportationsecuritychecks
_version_ 1721424149693333504