Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I

Beckett's dramatic works push the limits of language and subjectivity so far as to reach a point of total rupture from within. The stretching of these limits is indeed a bold attempt at overthrowing epistemological categories structured within and through them. Not I (1972) is one of such works...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rahime ÇOKAY NEBİOĞLU
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ankara University 2018-12-01
Series:Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/5492
id doaj-e280e2e005e7485b831b7ad565df533b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e280e2e005e7485b831b7ad565df533b2020-11-24T22:22:42ZdeuAnkara UniversityAnkara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi2459-01502018-12-015821628164610.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.2.224495Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not IRahime ÇOKAY NEBİOĞLU0Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University. rhmcky@gmail.comBeckett's dramatic works push the limits of language and subjectivity so far as to reach a point of total rupture from within. The stretching of these limits is indeed a bold attempt at overthrowing epistemological categories structured within and through them. Not I (1972) is one of such works in which the possibilities of language and subjectivity are taken to the furthest extent in which both turn upside down and inside out and finally reach their limits. The radical experiment with the inside and the outside of language and subjectivity in Not I becomes almost a metonymic embodiment of Lacan's ideas with regard to the formulation and dissolution of the self. In exposing how language and subjectivity go exhausted and are torn apart, however, Beckett, compared to Lacan, assumes a relatively affirmative position. While language and the subjects in fragments mark a psychotic breakdown and constitute a source of pain and lament in Lacanian psychoanalysis, they function as a creative and transformative resistance in Beckettian world. In this regard, this paper aims to examine Not I in the light of Lacanian theory and illustrate how the play both literalises and criticizes the problematic position of the female subject in language, exposing the points of intersection and divergence between Beckett and Lacan.http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/5492BeckettNot ILacanThe SymbolicLanguageSubjectivity
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rahime ÇOKAY NEBİOĞLU
spellingShingle Rahime ÇOKAY NEBİOĞLU
Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I
Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
Beckett
Not I
Lacan
The Symbolic
Language
Subjectivity
author_facet Rahime ÇOKAY NEBİOĞLU
author_sort Rahime ÇOKAY NEBİOĞLU
title Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I
title_short Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I
title_full Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I
title_fullStr Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I
title_full_unstemmed Turning Language Inside Out in Beckett’s Not I
title_sort turning language inside out in beckett’s not i
publisher Ankara University
series Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi
issn 2459-0150
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Beckett's dramatic works push the limits of language and subjectivity so far as to reach a point of total rupture from within. The stretching of these limits is indeed a bold attempt at overthrowing epistemological categories structured within and through them. Not I (1972) is one of such works in which the possibilities of language and subjectivity are taken to the furthest extent in which both turn upside down and inside out and finally reach their limits. The radical experiment with the inside and the outside of language and subjectivity in Not I becomes almost a metonymic embodiment of Lacan's ideas with regard to the formulation and dissolution of the self. In exposing how language and subjectivity go exhausted and are torn apart, however, Beckett, compared to Lacan, assumes a relatively affirmative position. While language and the subjects in fragments mark a psychotic breakdown and constitute a source of pain and lament in Lacanian psychoanalysis, they function as a creative and transformative resistance in Beckettian world. In this regard, this paper aims to examine Not I in the light of Lacanian theory and illustrate how the play both literalises and criticizes the problematic position of the female subject in language, exposing the points of intersection and divergence between Beckett and Lacan.
topic Beckett
Not I
Lacan
The Symbolic
Language
Subjectivity
url http://dtcfdergisi.ankara.edu.tr/index.php/dtcf/article/view/5492
work_keys_str_mv AT rahimecokaynebioglu turninglanguageinsideoutinbeckettsnoti
_version_ 1725767035253686272