Why biogeography matters: historical biogeography vs. phylogeography and community phylogenetics for inferring ecological and evolutionary processes

• Main Author: John J. Wiens
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: International Biogeography Society 2012-09-01
• Series: Frontiers of Biogeography
• Subjects: biodiversity hotspot; biogeography; community ecology; community phylogenetics; phylogeny; phylogeography; species richness
• Online Access: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5n41f6cc

<em>Phylogenetic and phylogeographic approaches have become widespread in evolutionary biology, ecology, and biogeography.  However, analyses that incorporate inferences from historical biogeography (e.g. timing of colonization of a region) may be essential to answer the most important large-scale questions in these fields, but they remain infrequently used.  I focus on two examples here.  First, I argue that understanding the origins of biodiversity hotspots (and other high-diversity regions) requires comparing the timing of biogeographic colonization and diversification rates among regions.  In contrast, phylogeographic studies (analyses within species within a region) may themselves say little about why a region is diverse relative to others.  Second, incorporating historical biogeograpy can help address the processes that determine community species richness and structure, such as dispersal, in-situ trait evolution, and in-situ speciation.  In contrast, the widespread “community phylogenetics” approach (focusing on relatedness of species in communities) may have limited ability to explain community richness and structure. </em>