Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy

Robert J Ellis,1–4 Victoria M White,5,6 Damien M Bolton,7,8 Michael D Coory,8 Ian D Davis,9,10 Ross S Francis,2–4 Graham G Giles,5,8 Glenda C Gobe,3,4 Rachel E Neale,1 Simon T Wood,3–4,10 Susan J Jordan1,31Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellis RJ, White VM, Bolton DM, Coory MD, Davis ID, Francis RS, Giles GG, Gobe GC, Neale RE, Wood ST, Jordan SJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2019-05-01
Series:Clinical Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/tumor-size-and-postoperative-kidney-function-following-radical-nephrec-peer-reviewed-article-CLEP
id doaj-e27df0192e474d9299f6e2c4647d1ce6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e27df0192e474d9299f6e2c4647d1ce62020-11-25T00:29:53ZengDove Medical PressClinical Epidemiology1179-13492019-05-01Volume 1133334845562Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomyEllis RJWhite VMBolton DMCoory MDDavis IDFrancis RSGiles GGGobe GCNeale REWood STJordan SJRobert J Ellis,1–4 Victoria M White,5,6 Damien M Bolton,7,8 Michael D Coory,8 Ian D Davis,9,10 Ross S Francis,2–4 Graham G Giles,5,8 Glenda C Gobe,3,4 Rachel E Neale,1 Simon T Wood,3–4,10 Susan J Jordan1,31Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 2Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 4Kidney Disease Research Collaborative, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 5Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 6School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 7Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 8Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 9Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 10Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaBackground: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) following nephrectomy for kidney tumors is common, and both patient and tumor characteristics may affect postoperative kidney function. Several studies have reported that surgery for large tumors is associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative CKD, but others have reported CKD to be more common before surgery in patients with large tumors.Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify inconsistencies in the literature regarding the prognostic significance of tumor size for postoperative kidney function.Study design and setting: We analyzed data from 944 kidney cancer patients managed with radical nephrectomy between January 2012 and December 2013, and 242 living kidney donors who underwent surgery between January 2011 and December 2014 in the Australian states of Queensland and Victoria. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the primary outcome of CKD upstaging. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate causal models, to delineate the influence of patient and tumor characteristics on postoperative kidney function.Results: We determined that a significant interaction between age and tumor size (P=0.03) led to the observed inverse association between large tumor size and CKD upstaging, and was accentuated by other forms of selection bias. Subgrouping patients by age and tumor size demonstrated that all patients aged ≥65 years were at increased risk of CKD upstaging, regardless of tumor size. Risk of CKD upstaging was comparable between age-matched living donors and kidney cancer patients.Conclusion: Larger tumors are unlikely to confer a protective effect with respect to postoperative kidney function. The reason for the previously reported inconsistency is likely a combination of the analytical approach and selection bias.Keywords: renal cell carcinoma, glomerular filtration rate, selection bias, tumor size, kidney cancer, living kidney donorshttps://www.dovepress.com/tumor-size-and-postoperative-kidney-function-following-radical-nephrec-peer-reviewed-article-CLEPrenal cell carcinomaglomerular filtration rateselection biastumour sizekidney cancerliving kidney donors
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ellis RJ
White VM
Bolton DM
Coory MD
Davis ID
Francis RS
Giles GG
Gobe GC
Neale RE
Wood ST
Jordan SJ
spellingShingle Ellis RJ
White VM
Bolton DM
Coory MD
Davis ID
Francis RS
Giles GG
Gobe GC
Neale RE
Wood ST
Jordan SJ
Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
Clinical Epidemiology
renal cell carcinoma
glomerular filtration rate
selection bias
tumour size
kidney cancer
living kidney donors
author_facet Ellis RJ
White VM
Bolton DM
Coory MD
Davis ID
Francis RS
Giles GG
Gobe GC
Neale RE
Wood ST
Jordan SJ
author_sort Ellis RJ
title Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
title_short Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
title_full Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
title_fullStr Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
title_sort tumor size and postoperative kidney function following radical nephrectomy
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Epidemiology
issn 1179-1349
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Robert J Ellis,1–4 Victoria M White,5,6 Damien M Bolton,7,8 Michael D Coory,8 Ian D Davis,9,10 Ross S Francis,2–4 Graham G Giles,5,8 Glenda C Gobe,3,4 Rachel E Neale,1 Simon T Wood,3–4,10 Susan J Jordan1,31Department of Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 2Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 4Kidney Disease Research Collaborative, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 5Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 6School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 7Department of Urology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 8Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 9Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University and Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 10Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaBackground: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) following nephrectomy for kidney tumors is common, and both patient and tumor characteristics may affect postoperative kidney function. Several studies have reported that surgery for large tumors is associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative CKD, but others have reported CKD to be more common before surgery in patients with large tumors.Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify inconsistencies in the literature regarding the prognostic significance of tumor size for postoperative kidney function.Study design and setting: We analyzed data from 944 kidney cancer patients managed with radical nephrectomy between January 2012 and December 2013, and 242 living kidney donors who underwent surgery between January 2011 and December 2014 in the Australian states of Queensland and Victoria. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the primary outcome of CKD upstaging. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate causal models, to delineate the influence of patient and tumor characteristics on postoperative kidney function.Results: We determined that a significant interaction between age and tumor size (P=0.03) led to the observed inverse association between large tumor size and CKD upstaging, and was accentuated by other forms of selection bias. Subgrouping patients by age and tumor size demonstrated that all patients aged ≥65 years were at increased risk of CKD upstaging, regardless of tumor size. Risk of CKD upstaging was comparable between age-matched living donors and kidney cancer patients.Conclusion: Larger tumors are unlikely to confer a protective effect with respect to postoperative kidney function. The reason for the previously reported inconsistency is likely a combination of the analytical approach and selection bias.Keywords: renal cell carcinoma, glomerular filtration rate, selection bias, tumor size, kidney cancer, living kidney donors
topic renal cell carcinoma
glomerular filtration rate
selection bias
tumour size
kidney cancer
living kidney donors
url https://www.dovepress.com/tumor-size-and-postoperative-kidney-function-following-radical-nephrec-peer-reviewed-article-CLEP
work_keys_str_mv AT ellisrj tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT whitevm tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT boltondm tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT coorymd tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT davisid tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT francisrs tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT gilesgg tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT gobegc tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT nealere tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT woodst tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
AT jordansj tumorsizeandpostoperativekidneyfunctionfollowingradicalnephrectomy
_version_ 1725329224227618816