Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis

Meniscal allograft transplantation may be a better alternative for the treatment of irreparable meniscal injury compared to other forms of treatment. However, it remains to be seen whether the use fresh frozen allograft is better than cryopreserved allograft in treating this type of injury. We hypot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shukur Ahmad, Vivek Ajit Singh, Shamsul Iskandar Hussein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017727946
id doaj-e26ab3bb18434ba081752a9600e61417
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e26ab3bb18434ba081752a9600e614172020-11-25T03:22:13ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902017-08-012510.1177/2309499017727946Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysisShukur Ahmad0Vivek Ajit Singh1Shamsul Iskandar Hussein2 Department of Orthopaedics (NOCERAL), University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Department of Orthopaedics (NOCERAL), University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Department of Orthopaedics (NOCERAL), University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaMeniscal allograft transplantation may be a better alternative for the treatment of irreparable meniscal injury compared to other forms of treatment. However, it remains to be seen whether the use fresh frozen allograft is better than cryopreserved allograft in treating this type of injury. We hypothesized that cryopreserved meniscal allograft would work better in maintaining the original biomechanical properties compared to fresh frozen ones, due to the lower amount of damage it incurs during the storage process. We examined young and healthy human menisci obtained from orthopedic oncology patients who underwent resection surgeries around the knee. The menisci obtained were preserved via cryopreservation and deep-freezing process. Traction tests were carried out on the menisci after 6 weeks of preservation. Twelve pairs ( N = 24) of menisci were divided equally into two groups, cryopreservation and deep frozen. There were six males and six female menisci donors for this study. The age range was between 15 and 35 years old (24.9 ± 8.6 years). Cryopreserved specimens had a higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS; 8.2 ± 1.3 Mpa vs. 13.3 ± 1.7 Mpa: p < 0.05) and elastic modulus (61.7 ± 27.6 Mpa vs. 87.0 ± 44.10 Mpa: p < 0.05) compared to the fresh frozen specimens. There was a significant difference in UTS ( p < 0.05) between the two groups but no significant difference in their elastic modulus ( p > 0.05). The elastic modulus of the preserved meniscus was similar to fresh normal menisci taken from other studies (60–120 Mpa; cryopreserved (87.0 ± 44.1) and fresh frozen (61.7 ± 27.5)). Cryopreserved menisci had a higher elastic modulus and point of rupture (UTS) compared to fresh frozen menisci. Cryopreservation proved to be a significantly better method of preservation, among the two methods of preservation in this study.https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017727946
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shukur Ahmad
Vivek Ajit Singh
Shamsul Iskandar Hussein
spellingShingle Shukur Ahmad
Vivek Ajit Singh
Shamsul Iskandar Hussein
Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Shukur Ahmad
Vivek Ajit Singh
Shamsul Iskandar Hussein
author_sort Shukur Ahmad
title Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis
title_short Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis
title_full Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis
title_fullStr Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: A biomechanical comparative analysis
title_sort cryopreservation versus fresh frozen meniscal allograft: a biomechanical comparative analysis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Meniscal allograft transplantation may be a better alternative for the treatment of irreparable meniscal injury compared to other forms of treatment. However, it remains to be seen whether the use fresh frozen allograft is better than cryopreserved allograft in treating this type of injury. We hypothesized that cryopreserved meniscal allograft would work better in maintaining the original biomechanical properties compared to fresh frozen ones, due to the lower amount of damage it incurs during the storage process. We examined young and healthy human menisci obtained from orthopedic oncology patients who underwent resection surgeries around the knee. The menisci obtained were preserved via cryopreservation and deep-freezing process. Traction tests were carried out on the menisci after 6 weeks of preservation. Twelve pairs ( N = 24) of menisci were divided equally into two groups, cryopreservation and deep frozen. There were six males and six female menisci donors for this study. The age range was between 15 and 35 years old (24.9 ± 8.6 years). Cryopreserved specimens had a higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS; 8.2 ± 1.3 Mpa vs. 13.3 ± 1.7 Mpa: p < 0.05) and elastic modulus (61.7 ± 27.6 Mpa vs. 87.0 ± 44.10 Mpa: p < 0.05) compared to the fresh frozen specimens. There was a significant difference in UTS ( p < 0.05) between the two groups but no significant difference in their elastic modulus ( p > 0.05). The elastic modulus of the preserved meniscus was similar to fresh normal menisci taken from other studies (60–120 Mpa; cryopreserved (87.0 ± 44.1) and fresh frozen (61.7 ± 27.5)). Cryopreserved menisci had a higher elastic modulus and point of rupture (UTS) compared to fresh frozen menisci. Cryopreservation proved to be a significantly better method of preservation, among the two methods of preservation in this study.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017727946
work_keys_str_mv AT shukurahmad cryopreservationversusfreshfrozenmeniscalallograftabiomechanicalcomparativeanalysis
AT vivekajitsingh cryopreservationversusfreshfrozenmeniscalallograftabiomechanicalcomparativeanalysis
AT shamsuliskandarhussein cryopreservationversusfreshfrozenmeniscalallograftabiomechanicalcomparativeanalysis
_version_ 1724610538397237248