A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human heart failure is a complex disease that manifests from multiple genetic and environmental factors. Although ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease present clinically with many similar decreases in ventricular function, emergin...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2005-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Bioinformatics |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/205 |
id |
doaj-e25b0a558dd847d08b846b59f40c7682 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e25b0a558dd847d08b846b59f40c76822020-11-25T00:58:55ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052005-08-016120510.1186/1471-2105-6-205A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profilesPark Soon JChen YingjieHan XinqiangGrindle SuzannePan WeiHuang XiaohongMiller Leslie WHall Jennifer<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human heart failure is a complex disease that manifests from multiple genetic and environmental factors. Although ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease present clinically with many similar decreases in ventricular function, emerging work suggests that they are distinct diseases with different responses to therapy. The ability to distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure may be essential to guide appropriate therapy and determine prognosis for successful treatment. In this paper we consider discriminating the etiologies of heart failure using gene expression libraries from two separate institutions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We apply five new statistical methods, including partial least squares, penalized partial least squares, LASSO, nearest shrunken centroids and random forest, to two real datasets and compare their performance for multiclass classification. It is found that the five statistical methods perform similarly on each of the two datasets: it is difficult to correctly distinguish the etiologies of heart failure in one dataset whereas it is easy for the other one. In a simulation study, it is confirmed that the five methods tend to have close performance, though the random forest seems to have a slight edge.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For some gene expression data, several recently developed discriminant methods may perform similarly. More importantly, one must remain cautious when assessing the discriminating performance using gene expression profiles based on a small dataset; our analysis suggests the importance of utilizing multiple or larger datasets.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/205 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Park Soon J Chen Yingjie Han Xinqiang Grindle Suzanne Pan Wei Huang Xiaohong Miller Leslie W Hall Jennifer |
spellingShingle |
Park Soon J Chen Yingjie Han Xinqiang Grindle Suzanne Pan Wei Huang Xiaohong Miller Leslie W Hall Jennifer A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles BMC Bioinformatics |
author_facet |
Park Soon J Chen Yingjie Han Xinqiang Grindle Suzanne Pan Wei Huang Xiaohong Miller Leslie W Hall Jennifer |
author_sort |
Park Soon J |
title |
A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles |
title_short |
A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles |
title_full |
A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles |
title_fullStr |
A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles |
title_sort |
comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Bioinformatics |
issn |
1471-2105 |
publishDate |
2005-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human heart failure is a complex disease that manifests from multiple genetic and environmental factors. Although ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease present clinically with many similar decreases in ventricular function, emerging work suggests that they are distinct diseases with different responses to therapy. The ability to distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure may be essential to guide appropriate therapy and determine prognosis for successful treatment. In this paper we consider discriminating the etiologies of heart failure using gene expression libraries from two separate institutions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We apply five new statistical methods, including partial least squares, penalized partial least squares, LASSO, nearest shrunken centroids and random forest, to two real datasets and compare their performance for multiclass classification. It is found that the five statistical methods perform similarly on each of the two datasets: it is difficult to correctly distinguish the etiologies of heart failure in one dataset whereas it is easy for the other one. In a simulation study, it is confirmed that the five methods tend to have close performance, though the random forest seems to have a slight edge.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For some gene expression data, several recently developed discriminant methods may perform similarly. More importantly, one must remain cautious when assessing the discriminating performance using gene expression profiles based on a small dataset; our analysis suggests the importance of utilizing multiple or larger datasets.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/205 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT parksoonj acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT chenyingjie acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT hanxinqiang acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT grindlesuzanne acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT panwei acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT huangxiaohong acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT millerlesliew acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT halljennifer acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT parksoonj comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT chenyingjie comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT hanxinqiang comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT grindlesuzanne comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT panwei comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT huangxiaohong comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT millerlesliew comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles AT halljennifer comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles |
_version_ |
1725219765912338432 |