A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human heart failure is a complex disease that manifests from multiple genetic and environmental factors. Although ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease present clinically with many similar decreases in ventricular function, emergin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Park Soon J, Chen Yingjie, Han Xinqiang, Grindle Suzanne, Pan Wei, Huang Xiaohong, Miller Leslie W, Hall Jennifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-08-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/205
id doaj-e25b0a558dd847d08b846b59f40c7682
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e25b0a558dd847d08b846b59f40c76822020-11-25T00:58:55ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052005-08-016120510.1186/1471-2105-6-205A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profilesPark Soon JChen YingjieHan XinqiangGrindle SuzannePan WeiHuang XiaohongMiller Leslie WHall Jennifer<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human heart failure is a complex disease that manifests from multiple genetic and environmental factors. Although ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease present clinically with many similar decreases in ventricular function, emerging work suggests that they are distinct diseases with different responses to therapy. The ability to distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure may be essential to guide appropriate therapy and determine prognosis for successful treatment. In this paper we consider discriminating the etiologies of heart failure using gene expression libraries from two separate institutions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We apply five new statistical methods, including partial least squares, penalized partial least squares, LASSO, nearest shrunken centroids and random forest, to two real datasets and compare their performance for multiclass classification. It is found that the five statistical methods perform similarly on each of the two datasets: it is difficult to correctly distinguish the etiologies of heart failure in one dataset whereas it is easy for the other one. In a simulation study, it is confirmed that the five methods tend to have close performance, though the random forest seems to have a slight edge.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For some gene expression data, several recently developed discriminant methods may perform similarly. More importantly, one must remain cautious when assessing the discriminating performance using gene expression profiles based on a small dataset; our analysis suggests the importance of utilizing multiple or larger datasets.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/205
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Park Soon J
Chen Yingjie
Han Xinqiang
Grindle Suzanne
Pan Wei
Huang Xiaohong
Miller Leslie W
Hall Jennifer
spellingShingle Park Soon J
Chen Yingjie
Han Xinqiang
Grindle Suzanne
Pan Wei
Huang Xiaohong
Miller Leslie W
Hall Jennifer
A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Park Soon J
Chen Yingjie
Han Xinqiang
Grindle Suzanne
Pan Wei
Huang Xiaohong
Miller Leslie W
Hall Jennifer
author_sort Park Soon J
title A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
title_short A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
title_full A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
title_fullStr A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
title_sort comparative study of discriminating human heart failure etiology using gene expression profiles
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2005-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Human heart failure is a complex disease that manifests from multiple genetic and environmental factors. Although ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease present clinically with many similar decreases in ventricular function, emerging work suggests that they are distinct diseases with different responses to therapy. The ability to distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure may be essential to guide appropriate therapy and determine prognosis for successful treatment. In this paper we consider discriminating the etiologies of heart failure using gene expression libraries from two separate institutions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We apply five new statistical methods, including partial least squares, penalized partial least squares, LASSO, nearest shrunken centroids and random forest, to two real datasets and compare their performance for multiclass classification. It is found that the five statistical methods perform similarly on each of the two datasets: it is difficult to correctly distinguish the etiologies of heart failure in one dataset whereas it is easy for the other one. In a simulation study, it is confirmed that the five methods tend to have close performance, though the random forest seems to have a slight edge.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>For some gene expression data, several recently developed discriminant methods may perform similarly. More importantly, one must remain cautious when assessing the discriminating performance using gene expression profiles based on a small dataset; our analysis suggests the importance of utilizing multiple or larger datasets.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/6/205
work_keys_str_mv AT parksoonj acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT chenyingjie acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT hanxinqiang acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT grindlesuzanne acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT panwei acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT huangxiaohong acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT millerlesliew acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT halljennifer acomparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT parksoonj comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT chenyingjie comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT hanxinqiang comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT grindlesuzanne comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT panwei comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT huangxiaohong comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT millerlesliew comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
AT halljennifer comparativestudyofdiscriminatinghumanheartfailureetiologyusinggeneexpressionprofiles
_version_ 1725219765912338432