The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?

The architecture competition is a high point of interaction between very diverse actors, architecture specialists or not. However, is it really an opportunity for exchange and shared learning? Based on surveys conducted in France and in several European countries on behalf of the French Ministry of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Véronique Biau, Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger, Bendicht Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jap Sam Books 2020-07-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/3833
id doaj-e238aff3a89e405db10af715a9993f8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e238aff3a89e405db10af715a9993f8b2021-02-08T12:05:24ZengJap Sam BooksFootprint1875-15041875-14902020-07-0114110.7480/footprint.14.1.3833The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?Véronique Biau0Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger1Bendicht Weber2Ecole Nationale Superieure d'Architecture de Paris-La Villette, laboratoire LET-LAVUEENSA Paris-La Villette, LET-LAVUEENSA Paris-La Villette The architecture competition is a high point of interaction between very diverse actors, architecture specialists or not. However, is it really an opportunity for exchange and shared learning? Based on surveys conducted in France and in several European countries on behalf of the French Ministry of Culture, this contribution aims to identify the conditions that foster the interactions inherent to competitions, the possible scope of these exchanges and the rationale behind them. When the competition is a chosen procedure, it is most often perceived as a moment of generating ideas that opens a professional debate and also addresses the general public. When it is mandatory, the competition is guided by another logic: that of ensuring the fairness and transparency of the joint choice of a project and a service provider as well as the legality of the contract concluded with the latter. Depending on the place given by decision-makers to this legal and contractual dimension, the nature and scope of the debates around the competition vary widely. If the legalistic approach dominates, it tends to limit interactions. However if the contracting authority adopts a more open approach to the competition, from programming to the dissemination and capitalisation of its results, it can make a real process of collective deliberation and favour the growth of shared competence. https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/3833
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Véronique Biau
Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger
Bendicht Weber
spellingShingle Véronique Biau
Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger
Bendicht Weber
The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
Footprint
author_facet Véronique Biau
Jodelle Zetlaoui-Léger
Bendicht Weber
author_sort Véronique Biau
title The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
title_short The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
title_full The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
title_fullStr The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
title_full_unstemmed The Architecture Competition: A Beauty Contest or a Learning Opportunity?
title_sort architecture competition: a beauty contest or a learning opportunity?
publisher Jap Sam Books
series Footprint
issn 1875-1504
1875-1490
publishDate 2020-07-01
description The architecture competition is a high point of interaction between very diverse actors, architecture specialists or not. However, is it really an opportunity for exchange and shared learning? Based on surveys conducted in France and in several European countries on behalf of the French Ministry of Culture, this contribution aims to identify the conditions that foster the interactions inherent to competitions, the possible scope of these exchanges and the rationale behind them. When the competition is a chosen procedure, it is most often perceived as a moment of generating ideas that opens a professional debate and also addresses the general public. When it is mandatory, the competition is guided by another logic: that of ensuring the fairness and transparency of the joint choice of a project and a service provider as well as the legality of the contract concluded with the latter. Depending on the place given by decision-makers to this legal and contractual dimension, the nature and scope of the debates around the competition vary widely. If the legalistic approach dominates, it tends to limit interactions. However if the contracting authority adopts a more open approach to the competition, from programming to the dissemination and capitalisation of its results, it can make a real process of collective deliberation and favour the growth of shared competence.
url https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/3833
work_keys_str_mv AT veroniquebiau thearchitecturecompetitionabeautycontestoralearningopportunity
AT jodellezetlaouileger thearchitecturecompetitionabeautycontestoralearningopportunity
AT bendichtweber thearchitecturecompetitionabeautycontestoralearningopportunity
AT veroniquebiau architecturecompetitionabeautycontestoralearningopportunity
AT jodellezetlaouileger architecturecompetitionabeautycontestoralearningopportunity
AT bendichtweber architecturecompetitionabeautycontestoralearningopportunity
_version_ 1724280196676190208