THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS

The problem of estimating the Euler-Poincare' characteristic (Euler number for short) of a set in the 3d Euclidean space is considered, given that this set is observed in the points of a lattice. In this situation, which is typical in image analysis, the hoice of an appropriate data-based discr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joachim Ohser, Werner Nagel, Katja Schladitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Slovenian Society for Stereology and Quantitative Image Analysis 2011-05-01
Series:Image Analysis and Stereology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ias-iss.org/ojs/IAS/article/view/727
id doaj-e23254ae9f004313bee4bd178910d92c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e23254ae9f004313bee4bd178910d92c2020-11-24T22:57:47ZengSlovenian Society for Stereology and Quantitative Image AnalysisImage Analysis and Stereology1580-31391854-51652011-05-01221111910.5566/ias.v22.p11-19699THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONSJoachim OhserWerner NagelKatja SchladitzThe problem of estimating the Euler-Poincare' characteristic (Euler number for short) of a set in the 3d Euclidean space is considered, given that this set is observed in the points of a lattice. In this situation, which is typical in image analysis, the hoice of an appropriate data-based discretisation of the set is crucial. Four versions of a discretisation method which is based on the notion of adjacency systems are presented; these versions are referred to as (14.1 14.1), (14.2 14.2), (6.26), and (26.6). A comparative assessment of the four approaches is performed with respect to the systematic error occuring in application to Boolean models. It is a surprising result that, except for 26 6 , the estimators yield infinitely large systematic errors when the lattice spacing goes to zero. Furthermore, the measurements of the Euler number from 3d data of autoclaved aerated concrete illustrate the influence of the choice of adjacency and the behaviour of the estimators.http://www.ias-iss.org/ojs/IAS/article/view/727Euler-Poincaré characteristicdiscretisationbinary imageneighbourhoodadjacencyBoolean modelsystematic error
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joachim Ohser
Werner Nagel
Katja Schladitz
spellingShingle Joachim Ohser
Werner Nagel
Katja Schladitz
THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
Image Analysis and Stereology
Euler-Poincaré characteristic
discretisation
binary image
neighbourhood
adjacency
Boolean model
systematic error
author_facet Joachim Ohser
Werner Nagel
Katja Schladitz
author_sort Joachim Ohser
title THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
title_short THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
title_full THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
title_fullStr THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
title_full_unstemmed THE EULER NUMBER OF DISCRETISED SETS – SURPRISING RESULTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS
title_sort euler number of discretised sets – surprising results in three dimensions
publisher Slovenian Society for Stereology and Quantitative Image Analysis
series Image Analysis and Stereology
issn 1580-3139
1854-5165
publishDate 2011-05-01
description The problem of estimating the Euler-Poincare' characteristic (Euler number for short) of a set in the 3d Euclidean space is considered, given that this set is observed in the points of a lattice. In this situation, which is typical in image analysis, the hoice of an appropriate data-based discretisation of the set is crucial. Four versions of a discretisation method which is based on the notion of adjacency systems are presented; these versions are referred to as (14.1 14.1), (14.2 14.2), (6.26), and (26.6). A comparative assessment of the four approaches is performed with respect to the systematic error occuring in application to Boolean models. It is a surprising result that, except for 26 6 , the estimators yield infinitely large systematic errors when the lattice spacing goes to zero. Furthermore, the measurements of the Euler number from 3d data of autoclaved aerated concrete illustrate the influence of the choice of adjacency and the behaviour of the estimators.
topic Euler-Poincaré characteristic
discretisation
binary image
neighbourhood
adjacency
Boolean model
systematic error
url http://www.ias-iss.org/ojs/IAS/article/view/727
work_keys_str_mv AT joachimohser theeulernumberofdiscretisedsetssurprisingresultsinthreedimensions
AT wernernagel theeulernumberofdiscretisedsetssurprisingresultsinthreedimensions
AT katjaschladitz theeulernumberofdiscretisedsetssurprisingresultsinthreedimensions
AT joachimohser eulernumberofdiscretisedsetssurprisingresultsinthreedimensions
AT wernernagel eulernumberofdiscretisedsetssurprisingresultsinthreedimensions
AT katjaschladitz eulernumberofdiscretisedsetssurprisingresultsinthreedimensions
_version_ 1725649160141537280